Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Determine a method to generate random observations for the following pdf: $$ f(x)=\left\\{\begin{array}{ll} 4 x^{3} & 0

Short Answer

Expert verified
The R function which generates \'n\' random observations from the given pdf is:\[\begin{verbatim} generate_random <- function(n) { y <- runif(n) x <- y^(1/4) return(x)} \end{verbatim} \]

Step by step solution

01

Identify the PDF and its domain

The given probability density function (pdf) is \( f(x) = 4x^3 \) in the domain \( 0 < x < 1 \), and \( f(x) = 0 \) elsewhere. This tells us that the random variable can only take values between 0 and 1.
02

Computing the Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF)

The cumulative distribution function (CDF) can be computed by integrating the pdf over its domain. In our case, the CDF \( F(x) = \int_0^x f(u) du = \int_0^x 4u^3 du = u^4 \) evaluated from 0 to x, which results in \( F(x) = x^4 \) for \( 0 < x < 1 \), and 0 or 1 elsewhere.
03

Implementing Inverse Transform Sampling

The inverse transform sampling method requires the inverse of the CDF, \( F^{-1}(x) \). This can be computed by solving \( F(x) = y \) for \( x \), where \( y \) is a uniformly distributed random variable in (0,1). From \( F(x) = x^4 \) we find \( F^{-1}(y) = \sqrt[4]{y} \) for \( 0 < y < 1 \). This is the transformation we apply to the uniformly distributed random variates to obtain the desired distribution.
04

Write the R function

The R function for generating random observations from the given pdf can be written as follows: \[\begin{verbatim} generate_random <- function(n) { y <- runif(n) x <- y^(1/4) return(x)} \end{verbatim} \]The function takes one argument, \( n \), the number of random observations required. The function generates \( n \) uniformly distributed random numbers in (0,1) using the runif function, then transforms these numbers using the inverse CDF \( \sqrt[4]{\cdot} \), and returns the transformed numbers.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercise 4.2.11, the sampling was from the \(N(0,1)\) distribution. Show, however, that setting \(\mu=0\) and \(\sigma=1\) is without loss of generality. Hint: First, \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{n}\) is a random sample from the \(N\left(\mu, \sigma^{2}\right)\) if and only if \(Z_{1}, \ldots, Z_{n}\) is a random sample from the \(N(0,1)\), where \(Z_{i}=\left(X_{i}-\mu\right) / \sigma\). Then show the confidence interval based on the \(Z_{i}\) 's contains 0 if and only if the confidence interval based on the \(X_{i}\) 's contains \(\mu\).

Here are the weights of 26 professional baseball pitchers; [see page 76 of Hettmansperger and McKean (2011) for the complete data set]. The data are in \(\mathrm{R}\) file bb. rda. Suppose we assume that the weight of a professional baseball pitcher is normally distributed with mean \(\mu\) and variance \(\sigma^{2}\). \(\begin{array}{llllllllllllll}160 & 175 & 180 & 185 & 185 & 185 & 190 & 190 & 195 & 195 & 195 & 200 & 200 \\ 200 & 200 & 205 & 205 & 210 & 210 & 218 & 219 & 220 & 222 & 225 & 225 & 232\end{array}\) (a) Obtain a histogram of the data. Based on this plot, is a normal probability model credible? (b) Obtain the maximum likelihood estimates of \(\mu, \sigma^{2}, \sigma\), and \(\mu / \sigma .\) Locate your estimate of \(\mu\) on your plot in part (a). Then overlay the normal pdf with these estimates on your histogram in Part (a). (c) Using the binomial model, obtain the maximum likelihood estimate of the proportion \(p\) of professional baseball pitchers who weigh over 215 pounds. (d) Determine the mle of \(p\) assuming that the weight of a professional baseball player follows the normal probability model \(N\left(\mu, \sigma^{2}\right)\) with \(\mu\) and \(\sigma\) unknown.

This data set was downloaded from the site http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/DASL/ at Carnegie-Melon university. The original source is Willerman et al. (1991). The data consist of a sample of brain information recorded on 40 college students. The variables include gender, height, weight, three IQ measurements, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) counts, as a determination of brain size. The data are in the rda file braindata. rda at the sites referenced in the Preface. For this exercise, consider the MRI counts. (a) Load the rda file braindata.rda and print the MRI data, using the code: \(\mathrm{mri}<-\) braindata \([, 7] ;\) print(mri). (b) Obtain a histogram of the data, hist \((m r i, p r=T)\). Comment on the shape. (c) Overlay the default density estimator, lines (density(mri)). Comment on the shape. 4.1.10. This data set was downloaded from the site http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/DASL/ at Carnegie-Melon university. The original source is Willerman et al. (1991). The data consist of a sample of brain information recorded on 40 college students. The variables include gender, height, weight, three IQ measurements, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) counts, as a determination of brain size. The data are in the rda file braindata. rda at the sites referenced in the Preface. For this exercise, consider the MRI counts. (a) Load the rda file braindata.rda and print the MRI data, using the code: \(\mathrm{mri}<-\) braindata \([, 7] ;\) print(mri). (b) Obtain a histogram of the data, hist \((m r i, p r=T)\). Comment on the shape. (c) Overlay the default density estimator, lines (density(mri)). Comment on the shape.

Two different teaching procedures were used on two different groups of students. Each group contained 100 students of about the same ability. At the end of the term, an evaluating team assigned a letter grade to each student. The results were tabulated as follows. \begin{tabular}{ccccccc} \hline & \multicolumn{5}{c} { Grade } & \\ \cline { 2 - 6 } Group & A & B & C & D & F & Total \\ \hline I & 15 & 25 & 32 & 17 & 11 & 100 \\ II & 9 & 18 & 29 & 28 & 16 & 100 \\ \hline \end{tabular} If we consider these data to be independent observations from two respective multinomial distributions with \(k=5\), test at the \(5 \%\) significance level the hypothesis

Let \(X\) have a Poisson distribution with mean \(\theta\). Consider the simple hypothesis \(H_{0}: \theta=\frac{1}{2}\) and the alternative composite hypothesis \(H_{1}: \theta<\frac{1}{2} .\) Thus \(\Omega=\left\\{\theta: 0<\theta \leq \frac{1}{2}\right\\}\). Let \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{12}\) denote a random sample of size 12 from this distribution. We reject \(H_{0}\) if and only if the observed value of \(Y=X_{1}+\cdots+X_{12} \leq 2\). Show that the following \(\mathrm{R}\) code graphs the power function of this test: theta=seq \((.1, .5, .05) ;\) gam=ppois \((2\), theta*12 \()\) plot (gam "theta, pch=" ", xlab=expression(theta), ylab=expression(gamma)) lines (gam "theta) Run the code. Determine the significance level from the plot.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free