Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Obtain the sensitivity curves for the sample mean, the sample median and the Hodges-Lehmann estimator for the following data set. Evaluate the curves at the values \(-300\) to 300 in increments of 10 and graph the curves on the same plot. Compare the sensitivity curves. $$ \begin{array}{rrrrrrrr} -9 & 58 & 12 & -1 & -37 & 0 & 11 & 21 \\ 18 & -24 & -4 & -53 & -9 & 9 & 8 & \end{array} $$ Note that the \(\mathrm{R}\) command wilcox.test \((\mathrm{x}\), conf . int \(=\mathrm{T}\) ) \$est computes the Hodges Lehmann estimate for the \(\mathrm{R}\) vector \(\mathrm{x}\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The sensitivity curves for the sample mean, sample median, and Hodges-Lehmann estimator provide visual representations of how these three estimates respond to shifts in the data values from -300 to 300. Their comparative analysis helps understand their differing sensitivity to changes in the data. Particular behaviors of these curves depend on the actual values of the data points, hence will be different for each specific case.

Step by step solution

01

Load the data

First, load the data into a vector using the c() function in R. Here's an example for the given data: \[ \text{{x <- c(-9, 58, 12, -1, -37, 0, 11, 21, 18, -24, -4, -53, -9, 9, 8)}} \]
02

Define a function for each estimator

Next, create functions to calculate the sample mean, median, and Hodges-Lehmann estimator. The sample mean and median have built-in functions in R: mean() and median(). For the Hodges-Lehmann estimator, use the wilcox.test() function with conf.int = TRUE to get the estimate: \[ \text{{hl_estimate <- function(x) {wilcox.test(x, conf.int = TRUE)$estimate}}} \]
03

Generate curves

Now it's time to generate the sensitivity curves. Iteratively add values from -300 to 300 to each data point, calculate the estimators, and store the results. For example, for the sample mean: \[ \text{{mean_curve <- sapply(-300:300, function(i) mean(x + i))}} \]
04

Plot the curves

Plot the three sets of results on the same graph using the plot() and lines() functions in R, which allows to visually compare their sensitivities. Label each line for clarity. One possible example could be: \[ \text{{plot(-300:300, mean_curve, type = 'l', col = 'blue', ylim = range(c(mean_curve, median_curve, hl_curve)), main = 'Sensitivity Curves', xlab = 'Increments', ylab = 'Estimator')}} \] \[ \text{{lines(-300:300, median_curve, col = 'red')}} \] \[ \text{{lines(-300:300, hl_curve, col = 'green')}} \]
05

Compare Curves

Lastly, compare the sensitivity curves. Comment on how they behave with increments. Do they increase or decrease? How do they react to positive and negative shifts? Note any steep or shallow parts of the curves, as these indicate where the estimators are most and least sensitive to changes in the data values.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Often influence functions are derived by differentiating implicitly the defining equation for the functional at the contaminated cdf \(F_{x, e}(t),(10.9 .13) .\) Consider the mean functional with the defining equation (10.9.10). Using the linearity of the differential, first show that the defining equation at the cdf \(F_{x, \epsilon}(t)\) can be expressed as $$ \begin{aligned} 0=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\left[t-T\left(F_{x, \epsilon}\right)\right] d F_{x, \epsilon}(t)=&(1-\epsilon) \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\left[t-T\left(F_{x, \epsilon}\right)\right] f_{X}(t) d t \\ &+\epsilon \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\left[t-T\left(F_{x, \epsilon}\right)\right] d \Delta(t) \end{aligned} $$ Recall that we want \(\partial T\left(F_{x, \epsilon}\right) / \partial \epsilon .\) Obtain this by implicitly differentiating the above equation with respect to \(\epsilon\).

Optimal signed-rank based methods also exist for the one-sample problem. In this exercise, we briefly discuss these methods. Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) follow the location model $$ X_{i}=\theta+e_{i}, \quad(10.5 .39) $$ where \(e_{1}, e_{2}, \ldots, e_{n}\) are iid with pdf \(f(x)\), which is symmetric about \(0 ;\) i.e., \(f(-x)=\) \(f(x)\) (a) Show that under symmetry the optimal two-sample score function \((10.5 .26)\) satisfies $$ \varphi_{f}(1-u)=-\varphi_{f}(u), \quad 00 $$ Our decision rule for the statistic \(W_{\varphi^{+}}\) is to reject \(H_{0}\) in favor of \(H_{1}\) if \(W_{\varphi^{+}} \geq\) \(k\), for some \(k\). Write \(W_{\varphi^{+}}\) in terms of the anti-ranks, \((10.3 .5) .\) Show that \(W_{\varphi^{+}}\) is distribution-free under \(H_{0}\). (f) Determine the mean and variance of \(W_{\varphi^{+}}\) under \(H_{0}\). (g) Assuming that, when properly standardized, the null distribution is asymptotically normal, determine the asymptotic test.

Consider the hypotheses (10.4.4). Suppose we select the score function \(\varphi(u)\) and the corresponding test based on \(W_{\varphi} .\) Suppose we want to determine the sample size \(n=n_{1}+n_{2}\) for this test of significance level \(\alpha\) to detect the alternative \(\Delta^{*}\) with approximate power \(\gamma^{*}\). Assuming that the sample sizes \(n_{1}\) and \(n_{2}\) are the same, show that $$ n \approx\left(\frac{\left(z_{\alpha}-z_{\gamma^{*}}\right) 2 \tau_{\varphi}}{\Delta^{*}}\right)^{2} $$

Show that Kendall's \(\tau\) satisfies the inequality \(-1 \leq \tau \leq 1\).

Consider the general score rank correlation coefficient \(r_{a}\) defined in Exercise 10.8.5. Consider the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: X\) and \(Y\) are independent. (a) Show that \(E_{H_{0}}\left(r_{a}\right)=0\). (b) Based on part (a) and \(H_{0}\), as a first step in obtaining the variance under \(H_{0}\), show that the following expression is true: $$ \operatorname{Var}_{H_{0}}\left(r_{a}\right)=\frac{1}{s_{a}^{4}} \sum_{i=1}^{n} \sum_{j=1}^{n} E_{H_{0}}\left[a\left(R\left(X_{i}\right)\right) a\left(R\left(X_{j}\right)\right)\right] E_{H_{0}}\left[a\left(R\left(Y_{i}\right)\right) a\left(R\left(Y_{j}\right)\right)\right] $$ (c) To determine the expectation in the last expression, consider the two cases \(i=j\) and \(i \neq j\). Then using uniformity of the distribution of the ranks, show that $$ \operatorname{Var}_{H_{0}}\left(r_{a}\right)=\frac{1}{s_{a}^{4}} \frac{1}{n-1} s_{a}^{4}=\frac{1}{n-1} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free