Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Here \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) are quadratic forms in observations of a random sample from \(N(0,1) .\) If \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) are independent and if \(Q_{1}+Q_{2}\) has a chi-square distribution, prove that \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) are chi-square variables.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Using properties of chi-square distributions, it can be proven that both \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) are chi-square distributed.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Assumptions

According to the problem, \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) are independent, and \(Q_{1}+Q_{2}\) is chi-square distributed. These are given conditions and do not need to be proven.
02

Apply property of chi-square distribution

The property of the chi-square distribution state that the sum of independent chi-square distributed random variables results in another chi-square distribution. Therefore, if \(Q_{1}+Q_{2}\) is chi-square distributed, and \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) are independent, then \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) must each be chi-square distributed by the property of additive chi-square distributions.
03

Conclusion

Based on the assumptions, the additive property of the chi-square distribution and the independence of \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\), it can be concluded that \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) must be chi-square distributed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A random sample of size \(n=6\) from a bivariate normal distribution yields a value of the correlation coefficient of \(0.89 .\) Would we accept or reject, at the 5 percent significance level, the hypothesis that \(\rho=0\).

Fit \(y=a+x\) to the data $$ \begin{array}{l|lll} \mathrm{x} & 0 & 1 & 2 \\ \hline \mathrm{y} & 1 & 3 & 4 \end{array} $$ by the method of least squares.

Let the independent random variables \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) have the joint pdf. $$ L\left(\alpha, \beta, \sigma^{2}\right)=\left(\frac{1}{2 \pi \sigma^{2}}\right)^{n / 2} \exp \left\\{-\frac{1}{2 \sigma^{2}} \sum_{1}^{n}\left[y_{i}-\alpha-\beta\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)\right]^{2}\right\\} $$ where the given numbers \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\) are not all equal. Let \(H_{0}: \beta=0(\alpha\) and \(\sigma^{2}\) unspecified). It is desired to use a likelihood ratio test to test \(H_{0}\) against all possible alternatives. Find \(\Lambda\) and see whether the test can be based on a familiar statistic. Hint: In the notation of this section show that $$ \sum_{1}^{n}\left(Y_{i}-\hat{\alpha}\right)^{2}=Q_{3}+\widehat{\beta}^{2} \sum_{1}^{n}\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)^{2} $$

In Exercise 9.2.1, show that the linear functions \(X_{i j}-X_{. j}\) and \(X_{. j}-X\).. are uncorrelated. Hint: Recall the definition of \(\bar{X}_{. j}\) and \(\bar{X}_{. .}\) and, without loss of generality, we can let \(E\left(X_{i j}\right)=0\) for all \(i, j\)

Let \(Q=X_{1} X_{2}-X_{3} X_{4}\), where \(X_{1}, X_{2}, X_{3}, X_{4}\) is a random sample of size 4 from a distribution which is \(N\left(0, \sigma^{2}\right) .\) Show that \(Q / \sigma^{2}\) does not have a chi-square distribution. Find the mgf of \(Q / \sigma^{2}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free