Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let the independent random variables \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) have the joint pdf. $$ L\left(\alpha, \beta, \sigma^{2}\right)=\left(\frac{1}{2 \pi \sigma^{2}}\right)^{n / 2} \exp \left\\{-\frac{1}{2 \sigma^{2}} \sum_{1}^{n}\left[y_{i}-\alpha-\beta\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)\right]^{2}\right\\} $$ where the given numbers \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\) are not all equal. Let \(H_{0}: \beta=0(\alpha\) and \(\sigma^{2}\) unspecified). It is desired to use a likelihood ratio test to test \(H_{0}\) against all possible alternatives. Find \(\Lambda\) and see whether the test can be based on a familiar statistic. Hint: In the notation of this section show that $$ \sum_{1}^{n}\left(Y_{i}-\hat{\alpha}\right)^{2}=Q_{3}+\widehat{\beta}^{2} \sum_{1}^{n}\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)^{2} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The exercise is mainly about applying the likelihood ratio test to test the null hypothesis against all possible alternatives and identify a well-known statistic that the test might be based on. In-depth understanding of likelihood ratio tests as well as the significance of the given hint will greatly facilitate the successful completion of the exercise.

Step by step solution

01

Write out the Likelihood Functions under Null and Alternative Hypotheses

First, formulate the likelihood function under the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) (\(\beta=0\)) and the alternative hypothesis (\(\beta\neq0\)). The likelihood function under the null hypothesis is denoted by: \[L_{0}\left(\alpha, \sigma^{2}\right)=\left(\frac{1}{2 \pi \sigma^{2}}\right)^{n / 2} \exp \left\{-\frac{1}{2 \sigma^{2}} \sum_{1}^{n}\left[y_{i}-\alpha\right]^{2}\right\}\], while the likelihood function under the alternative hypothesis is the one provided in the problem.
02

Compute the Likelihood Ratio

Compute the likelihood ratio, which is defined as the ratio of the likelihoods under the null and the alternative hypotheses. \[\Lambda=\frac{L_{0}\left(\alpha, \sigma^{2}\right)}{L\left(\alpha, \beta, \sigma^{2}\right)}\] This forms the basis for the likelihood ratio test.
03

Apply the Given Hint

Make good use of the given hint which states \[\sum_{1}^{n}\left(Y_{i}-\hat{\alpha}\right)^{2}=Q_{3}+\widehat{\beta}^{2} \sum_{1}^{n}\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)^{2}\] This hint helps to further simplify the expression for the likelihood ratio \(\Lambda\).
04

Identify Familiar Statistic

After simplifying the expression for \(\Lambda\), identify a commonly known statistic (like the \(t\)-statistic, \(F\)-statistic, etc.) by comparing it with standard formulas.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that \(R=\frac{\sum_{1}^{n}\left(X_{i}-\bar{X}\right)\left(Y_{i}-\bar{Y}\right)}{\sqrt{\sum_{1}^{n}\left(X_{i}-\bar{X}\right)^{2} \sum_{1}^{n}\left(Y_{i}-Y\right)^{2}}}=\frac{\sum_{1}^{n} X_{i} Y_{i}-n \overline{X Y}}{\sqrt{\left(\sum_{1}^{n} X_{i}^{2}-n \bar{X}^{2}\right)\left(\sum_{1}^{n} Y_{i}^{2}-n \bar{Y}^{2}\right)}}\)

Given the following observations associated with a two-way classification with \(a=3\) and \(b=4\), compute the \(F\) -statistic used to test the equality of the column means \(\left(\beta_{1}=\beta_{2}=\beta_{3}=\beta_{4}=0\right)\) and the equality of the row means \(\left(\alpha_{1}=\alpha_{2}=\alpha_{3}=0\right)\), respectively. $$ \begin{array}{ccccc} \hline \text { Row/Column } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \\ \hline 1 & 3.1 & 4.2 & 2.7 & 4.9 \\ 2 & 2.7 & 2.9 & 1.8 & 3.0 \\ 3 & 4.0 & 4.6 & 3.0 & 3.9 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Fit by the method of least squares the plane \(z=a+b x+c y\) to the five points \((x, y, z):(-1,-2,5),(0,-2,4),(0,0,4),(1,0,2),(2,1,0)\).

If \(A_{1}, A_{2}, \ldots, A_{k}\) are events, prove, by induction, Boole's inequality $$ P\left(A_{1} \cup A_{2} \cup \cdots \cup A_{k}\right) \leq \sum_{1}^{k} P\left(A_{i}\right) $$ Then show that $$ P\left(A_{1}^{c} \cap A_{2}^{c} \cap \cdots \cap A_{k}^{c}\right) \geq 1-\sum_{1}^{b} P\left(A_{i}\right) $$

Assume that the sample \(\left(x_{1}, Y_{1}\right), \ldots,\left(x_{n}, Y_{n}\right)\) follows the linear model \((9.6 .1)\). Suppose \(Y_{0}\) is a future observation at \(x=x_{0}-\bar{x}\) and we want to determine a predictive interval for it. Assume that the model \((9.6 .1)\) holds for \(Y_{0}\); i.e., \(Y_{0}\) has a \(N\left(\alpha+\beta\left(x_{0}-\bar{x}\right), \sigma^{2}\right)\) distribution. We will use \(\hat{\eta}_{0}\) of Exercise \(9.6 .4\) as our prediction of \(Y_{0}\) (a) Obtain the distribution of \(Y_{0}-\hat{\eta}_{0}\). Use the fact that the future observation \(Y_{0}\) is independent of the sample \(\left(x_{1}, Y_{1}\right), \ldots,\left(x_{n}, Y_{n}\right)\) (b) Determine a \(t\) -statistic with numerator \(Y_{0}-\hat{\eta}_{0}\). (c) Now beginning with \(1-\alpha=P\left[-t_{\alpha / 2, n-2}

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free