Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let the independent random variables \(Y_{1}, Y_{2}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) have, respectively, the probability density functions \(N\left(\beta x_{i}, \gamma^{2} x_{i}^{2}\right), i=1,2, \ldots, n\), where the given numbers \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\) are not all equal and no one is zero. Find the maximum likelihood estimators of \(\beta\) and \(\gamma^{2}\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
By following the steps above, you will find the maximum likelihood estimators \(\hat{\beta}\) and \(\hat{\gamma}^{2}\) by setting the respective derivatives of the log-likelihood function to zero and solving them.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the given information and determining the PDFs

We are given independent random variables \(Y_{1}, Y_{2}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) with respective probability density functions being normal distributions: \(N\left(\beta x_{i},\gamma^{2} x_{i}^{2}\right)\), for \(i=1,2, \ldots, n\). In the case of a normal distribution, the parameters \(\beta x_{i}\) and \(\gamma^{2} x_{i}^{2}\) represent the mean and the variance respectively.
02

Constructing the likelihood function

The likelihood function is the joint probability function of all the observations: \(L(\beta, \gamma^2) = \prod_{i=1}^{n} f_Y (y_i; \beta, \gamma^2)\). Since these observations are independent, the overall likelihood is the product of the individual likelihoods: \(L(\beta,\gamma^{2})=\prod_{i=1}^{n}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\gamma^{2}x_{i}^{2}}}e^{\frac{-(y_{i}-\beta x_{i})^{2}}{2\gamma^{2}x_{i}^{2}}}\).
03

Taking the logarithm of the likelihood function

Take the natural logarithm of the likelihood function to simplify it. This step give us the log-Likelihood function: \( l(\beta, \gamma^2) = \ln L(\beta, \gamma^2) \).
04

Taking the derivatives of the log-likelihood function

Taking the derivative of the log-likelihood function with respect to \(\beta\) and setting it equal to zero gives the maximum likelihood estimator of \(\beta\). Similarly, taking the derivative of the log-likelihood function with respect to \(\gamma^{2}\) and setting it equal to zero gives the maximum likelihood estimator of \(\gamma^{2}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercise 9.2.1, show that the linear functions \(X_{i j}-X_{. j}\) and \(X_{. j}-X\).. are uncorrelated. Hint: Recall the definition of \(\bar{X}_{. j}\) and \(\bar{X}_{. .}\) and, without loss of generality, we can let \(E\left(X_{i j}\right)=0\) for all \(i, j\)

Student's scores on the mathematics portion of the ACT examination, \(x\), and on the final examination in the first-semester calculus ( 200 points possible), \(y\), are given. (a) Calculate the least squares regression line for these data. (b) Plot the points and the least squares regression line on the same graph. (c) Find point estimates for \(\alpha, \beta\), and \(\sigma^{2}\). (d) Find 95 percent confidence intervals for \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) under the usual assumptions. $$ \begin{array}{cc|cc} \hline \mathrm{x} & \mathrm{y} & \mathrm{x} & \mathrm{y} \\ \hline 25 & 138 & 20 & 100 \\ 20 & 84 & 25 & 143 \\ 26 & 104 & 26 & 141 \\ 26 & 112 & 28 & 161 \\ 28 & 88 & 25 & 124 \\ 28 & 132 & 31 & 118 \\ 29 & 90 & 30 & 168 \\ 32 & 183 & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$

(Bonferroni Multiple Comparison Procedure). In the notation of this section, let \(\left(k_{i 1}, k_{i 2}, \ldots, k_{i b}\right), i=1,2, \ldots, m\), represent a finite number of \(b\) -tuples. The problem is to find simultaneous confidence intervals for \(\sum_{j=1}^{b} k_{i j} \mu_{j}, i=1,2, \ldots, m\), by a method different from that of Scheffé. Define the random variable \(T_{i}\) by $$ \left(\sum_{j=1}^{b} k_{i j} \bar{X}_{. j}-\sum_{j=1}^{b} k_{i j} \mu_{j}\right) / \sqrt{\left(\sum_{j=1}^{b} k_{i j}^{2}\right) V / a}, \quad i=1,2, \ldots, m $$ (a) Let the event \(A_{i}^{c}\) be given by \(-c_{i} \leq T_{i} \leq c_{i}, i=1,2, \ldots, m\). Find the random variables \(U_{i}\) and \(W_{i}\) such that \(U_{i} \leq \sum_{1}^{b} k_{i j} \mu_{j} \leq W_{j}\) is equivalent to \(A_{i}^{c}\) (b) Select \(c_{i}\) such that \(P\left(A_{i}^{c}\right)=1-\alpha / m ;\) that is, \(P\left(A_{i}\right)=\alpha / m .\) Use Exercise 9.4.1 to determine a lower bound on the probability that simultaneously the random intervals \(\left(U_{1}, W_{1}\right), \ldots,\left(U_{m}, W_{m}\right)\) include \(\sum_{j=1}^{b} k_{1 j} \mu_{j}, \ldots, \sum_{j=1}^{b} k_{m j} \mu_{j}\) respectively. (c) Let \(a=3, b=6\), and \(\alpha=0.05\). Consider the linear functions \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}, \mu_{2}-\mu_{3}\), \(\mu_{3}-\mu_{4}, \mu_{4}-\left(\mu_{5}+\mu_{6}\right) / 2\), and \(\left(\mu_{1}+\mu_{2}+\cdots+\mu_{6}\right) / 6 .\) Here \(m=5 .\) Show that the lengths of the confidence intervals given by the results of Part (b) are shorter than the corresponding ones given by the method of Scheffé as described in the text. If \(m\) becomes sufficiently large, however, this is not the case.

Two experiments gave the following results: $$ \begin{array}{cccccc} \hline \mathrm{n} & \bar{x} & \bar{y} & s_{x} & s_{y} & \mathrm{r} \\ \hline 100 & 10 & 20 & 5 & 8 & 0.70 \\ 200 & 12 & 22 & 6 & 10 & 0.80 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Calculate \(r\) for the combined sample.

Let the independent random variables \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) have the joint pdf. $$ L\left(\alpha, \beta, \sigma^{2}\right)=\left(\frac{1}{2 \pi \sigma^{2}}\right)^{n / 2} \exp \left\\{-\frac{1}{2 \sigma^{2}} \sum_{1}^{n}\left[y_{i}-\alpha-\beta\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)\right]^{2}\right\\} $$ where the given numbers \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\) are not all equal. Let \(H_{0}: \beta=0(\alpha\) and \(\sigma^{2}\) unspecified). It is desired to use a likelihood ratio test to test \(H_{0}\) against all possible alternatives. Find \(\Lambda\) and see whether the test can be based on a familiar statistic. Hint: In the notation of this section show that $$ \sum_{1}^{n}\left(Y_{i}-\hat{\alpha}\right)^{2}=Q_{3}+\widehat{\beta}^{2} \sum_{1}^{n}\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)^{2} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free