Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A random sample \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) arises from a distribution given by $$H_{0}: f(x ; \theta)=\frac{1}{\theta}, \quad 0

Short Answer

Expert verified
The likelihood ratio (\(\Lambda\)) for the given hypotheses \(H_{0}\) and \(H_{1}\) is \(\Lambda = e^{\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}/\theta}\).

Step by step solution

01

Compute the Likelihoods

First, it is necessary to calculate the likelihoods under each hypothesis. For a given sample \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\), the likelihoods are given by: \[L(\theta|H_{0}) = \prod_{i=1}^{n} f(x_{i}; \theta|H_{0}) = \prod_{i=1}^{n} \frac{1}{\theta} = \theta^{-n}\] for \(H_0\), and \[L(\theta|H_{1}) = \prod_{i=1}^{n} f(x_{i}; \theta|H_{1}) = \prod_{i=1}^{n} \frac{1}{\theta} e^{-x_{i}/\theta} = \theta^{-n} e^{-\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}/\theta}\] for \(H_1\).
02

Calculate the Likelihood Ratio

Next, compute the likelihood ratio, which is given by the ratio of the likelihoods under the two hypotheses. Therefore, \[\Lambda = \frac{L(\theta|H_{0})}{L(\theta|H_{1})} = \frac{\theta^{-n}}{\theta^{-n} e^{-\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}/\theta}} = e^{\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}/\theta}\]
03

Simplify the Ratio

Finally, simplify the ratio. As there is no information given on which will accept or reject the hypothesis, the solution will remain as likelihood ratio. In other scenarios, you may need to compare this ratio to a threshold to decide whether to accept or reject.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is an essential statistical tool used to decide between two competing hypotheses based on sample data. In this exercise, we examine two statistical hypotheses, known as the null hypothesis \(H_0\) and the alternative hypothesis \(H_1\).
  • The null hypothesis \(H_0\) assumes that data is uniformly distributed between \(0\) and \(\theta\).
  • The alternative hypothesis \(H_1\) suggests that the data follows an exponential distribution with rate \(\frac{1}{\theta}\).
The goal is to determine which hypothesis is more likely given the sample data. A common approach is the likelihood ratio test, which compares the likelihoods of the data under both hypotheses.
The test statistic, the likelihood ratio \(\Lambda\), helps us make this decision. A high or low value (based on a threshold) indicates which hypothesis is more plausible, though setting this threshold often depends on the context and desired confidence level.
Exponential Distribution
The exponential distribution is a continuous probability distribution commonly used to model the time between events in a process that occur continuously and independently.
It is characterized by a single parameter \(\theta\), which is both the mean and standard deviation of the distribution. The probability density function (PDF) is given by:
\[ f(x ; \theta) = \frac{1}{\theta} e^{-x / \theta} \quad \text{for} \; x > 0 \]
This distribution is widely used in scenarios like modeling the lifespan of electronic components or time until a radioactive particle decays.
Its memoryless property is particularly interesting, meaning the future probability of an event occurring does not depend on past events. In our exercise, \(H_1\) uses this exponential distribution to describe data that can occur over an infinite range, providing a contrast to \(H_0\) and aiding in hypothesis testing.
Uniform Distribution
The uniform distribution, also known as the rectangular distribution, is perhaps the simplest continuous probability distribution. It describes a scenario where every outcome in a finite range is equally likely. For this exercise, \(H_0\) represents the uniform distribution with a PDF defined as:
\[ f(x ; \theta) = \frac{1}{\theta} \quad \text{for} \; 0 < x < \theta \]
It is zero elsewhere, indicating the data can only take on values within \(0\) and \(\theta\).
When using the uniform distribution in hypothesis testing, the likelihood function under \(H_0\) is computed as the product of densities at the observed data points. This distribution is applied in scenarios like generating random numbers where each number in a given range should have an equal chance of being chosen. The simplicity and bounded nature of the uniform distribution make it a useful baseline hypothesis when contrasting with more complex alternatives, such as the exponential distribution in this case.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(X\) and \(Y\) have the joint pdf. $$f\left(x, y ; \theta_{1}, \theta_{2}\right)=\frac{1}{\theta_{1} \theta_{2}} \exp \left(-\frac{x}{\theta_{1}}-\frac{y}{\theta_{2}}\right), \quad 0

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) denote a random sample from a normal distribution \(N(\theta, 16)\). Find the sample size \(n\) and a uniformly most powerful test of \(H_{0}: \theta=25\) against \(H_{1}: \theta<25\) with power function \(\gamma(\theta)\) so that approximately \(\gamma(25)=0.10\) and \(\gamma(23)=0.90\).

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be a random sample from the normal distribution \(N(\theta, 1)\). Show that the likelihood ratio principle for testing \(H_{0}: \theta=\theta^{\prime}\), where \(\theta^{\prime}\) is specified, against \(H_{1}: \theta \neq \theta^{\prime}\) leads to the inequality \(\left|\bar{x}-\theta^{\prime}\right| \geq c\) (a) Is this a uniformly most powerful test of \(H_{0}\) against \(H_{1} ?\) (b) Is this a uniformly most powerful unbiased test of \(H_{0}\) against \(H_{1} ?\)

Show that the likelihood ratio principle leads to the same test when testing a simple hypothesis \(H_{0}\) against an alternative simple hypothesis \(H_{1}\), as that given by the Neyman-Pearson theorem. Note that there are only two points in \(\Omega\).

Let \(X\) have the pdf \(f(x ; \theta)=\theta^{x}(1-\theta)^{1-x}, x=0,1\), zero elsewhere. We test \(H_{0}: \theta=\frac{1}{2}\) against \(H_{1}: \theta<\frac{1}{2}\) by taking a random sample \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{5}\) of size \(n=5\) and rejecting \(H_{0}\) if \(Y=\sum_{1}^{n} X_{i}\) is observed to be less than or equal to a constant \(c\). (a) Show that this is a uniformly most powerful test. (b) Find the significance level when \(c=1\). (c) Find the significance level when \(c=0\). (d) By using a randomized test, as discussed in Example \(5.6 .4\), modify the tests given in Parts (b) and (c) to find a test with significance level \(\alpha=\frac{2}{32}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free