Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be a random sample of size \(n\) from a geometric distribution that has pmf \(f(x ; \theta)=(1-\theta)^{x} \theta, x=0,1,2, \ldots, 0<\theta<1\), zero elsewhere. Show that \(\sum_{1}^{n} X_{i}\) is a sufficient statistic for \(\theta\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, by applying the factorization theorem, we show that \( \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_{i} \) is a sufficient statistic for \( \theta \) in a geometric distribution.

Step by step solution

01

Write down the joint pmf of the sample

As the geometric distribution is memoryless and each \( X_{i} \) is independent of the others, the joint pmf of the sample of size \( n \) is given by \( f(x_{1}, x_{2}, ..., x_{n} ; \theta) = \prod_{i=1}^{n} f(x_{i} ; \theta) = \prod_{i=1}^{n} (1-\theta)^{x_{i}} \theta \)
02

Rearrange the joint pmf using algebra

We can break down the joint pmf into two parts: one that contains the statistic \( \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i} \) and another that is free of it. Doing the algebra, we have \( f(x_{1}, x_{2}, ..., x_{n} ; \theta) = \theta^{n} (1-\theta)^{\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}} \)
03

Apply Factorization Theorem

According to the factorization theorem, the joint pmf can be expressed as a function of \( \theta \) and the sufficient statistic times a function of the data that does not contain \( \theta \). Here, it can be written as \( \theta^{n} (1-\theta)^{\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}} = g(\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}, \theta) h(x_{1}, x_{2}, ..., x_{n}) \), where \( g(t, \theta) = \theta^{n} (1-\theta)^{t} \) and \( h(x_{1}, x_{2}, ..., x_{n}) = 1 \), which does not involve \( \theta \)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be a random sample from a Poisson distribution with mean \(\theta>0\) (a) Statistician \(A\) observes the sample to be the values \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\) with sum \(y=\sum x_{i} .\) Find the mle of \(\theta\). (b) Statistician \(B\) loses the sample values \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n}\) but remembers the sum \(y_{1}\) and the fact that the sample arose from a Poisson distribution. Thus \(B\) decides to create some fake observations which he calls \(z_{1}, z_{2}, \ldots, z_{n}\) (as he knows they will probably not equal the original \(x\) -values) as follows. He notes that the conditional probability of independent Poisson random variables \(Z_{1}, Z_{2}, \ldots, Z_{n}\) being equal to \(z_{1}, z_{2}, \ldots, z_{n}\), given \(\sum z_{i}=y_{1}\) is $$\frac{\frac{\theta^{x_{1}} e^{-\theta}}{z_{1} !} \frac{\theta^{x_{2}} e^{-\theta}}{z_{2} !} \cdots \frac{\theta^{x_{n}} e^{-\theta}}{x_{n} !}}{\frac{(n \theta)^{y_{1}} e^{n \theta}}{y_{1} !}}=\frac{y_{1} !}{z_{1} ! z_{2} ! \cdots z_{n} !}\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)^{z_{1}}\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)^{z_{2}} \cdots\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)^{z_{m}}$$ since \(Y_{1}=\sum Z_{i}\) has a Poisson distribution with mean \(n \theta .\) The latter distribution is multinomial with \(y_{1}\) independent trials, each terminating in one of \(n\) mutually exclusive and exhaustive ways, each of which has the same probability \(1 / n .\) Accordingly, \(B\) runs such a multinomial experiment \(y_{1}\) independent trials and obtains \(z_{1}, z_{2}, \ldots, z_{n} .\) Find the likelihood function using these \(z\) values. Is it proportional to that of statistician \(A ?\) Hint: Here the likelihood function is the product of this conditional pdf and the pdf of \(Y_{1}=\sum Z_{i}\)

Let \(Y_{1}

Let \(Y_{1}

Let \(X\) have the pmf \(p(x ; \theta)=\frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{l}n \\\ x\end{array}\right) \theta^{|x|}(1-\theta)^{n-|x|}\), for \(x=\pm 1, \pm 2, \ldots, \pm n\), \(p(0, \theta)=(1-\theta)^{n}\), and zero elsewhere, where \(0<\theta<1\) (a) Show that this family \(\\{p(x ; \theta): 0<\theta<1\\}\) is not complete. (b) Let \(Y=|X| .\) Show that \(Y\) is a complete and sufficient statistic for \(\theta\).

Let the pdf \(f\left(x ; \theta_{1}, \theta_{2}\right)\) be of the form $$\exp \left[p_{1}\left(\theta_{1}, \theta_{2}\right) K_{1}(x)+p_{2}\left(\theta_{1}, \theta_{2}\right) K_{2}(x)+S(x)+q_{1}\left(\theta_{1}, \theta_{2}\right)\right], \quad a

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free