Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The Pareto distribution is frequently used a model in study of incomes and has the distribution function $$F\left(x ; \theta_{1}, \theta_{2}\right)=\left\{1(θ1/x)θ2θ1x0 elsewhere \right.$$ where θ1>0 and θ2>0. If X1,X2,,Xn is a random sample from this distribution, find the maximum likelihood estimators of θ1 and θ2.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The maximum likelihood estimators for θ1 and θ2 can be found by defining the likelihood function from the distribution function, deriving it with respect to θ1 and θ2, setting these derivations to zero and solving the resulting equations. However, without doing the actual mathematical derivation and calculation, we cannot provide the explicit form of the estimators. Please focus on understanding the method.

Step by step solution

01

Define the likelihood function

The likelihood function is the joint probability density function as a function of θ, given the observations. In this case, considering the given distribution function, we can write it as L(θ1,θ2|X)=i=1n1(θ1/xi)θ2 for all xiθ1 and the parameters \(\theta_{1}, \theta_{2} > 0\]. It's better to work on the log of this function, hence the Log-Likelihood function is l(θ1,θ2|X)=log[i=1n1(θ1/xi)θ2]=i=1nlog[1(θ1/xi)θ2].
02

Derive Partial Derivatives

Now, derive the partial derivatives of the log-likelihood function with respect to θ1 and θ2. Place these equal to zero, and then solve for θ1 and θ2. This maximises the likelihood function and gives the maximum likelihood estimates of θ1 and θ2. This step involves some tedious mathematical calculation, but the importance is knowing that such derivative equations need to be solved.
03

Solve the equations

After deriving the equations from step 2, solving those equations yields the maximum likelihood estimators for θ1 and θ2. Depending on the complexity of the derived equations from Step 2, this might involve numerical methods or might be straightforward to solve analytically.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Maximum Likelihood Estimators
Understanding the concept of maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) is crucial when working with statistical models. When given a set of data points, MLEs help us estimate the parameters of the underlying distribution that most likely produced our observed data. In essence, by maximizing the likelihood function—which represents the plausibility of our parameter values given the sample data—we can find the best-fit parameters for our model.

For the Pareto distribution, the MLEs for the scale parameter θ1 and the shape parameter θ2 are derived by finding the values that maximize the likelihood function. This process involves taking the derivative of the log-likelihood, setting these derivatives equal to zero, and solving for the parameters. This is because the likelihood function often involves products of probabilities, which become sums when logged—making the mathematical handling much easier.

The effectiveness of the MLEs comes from their nice statistical properties—for large samples, they tend to be unbiased, have minimum variance, and be normally distributed around the true parameter values.
Likelihood Function
The likelihood function is the backbone of maximum likelihood estimation. In statistics, it's a function of the parameters of a statistical model, given specific observed data. Unlike a probability function that predicts the outcome under known parameters, a likelihood function assumes the outcomes are fixed and assesses the plausibility of different parameter values for the model.

In the context of the Pareto distribution, the likelihood function would take the product of the probabilities of observing each data point in the sample. However, this can get very cumbersome with large datasets, as multiplying many probabilities together—especially small ones—can lead to computational difficulties, such as underflow. This is where the utility of the log-likelihood function comes into play, transforming a product into a sum, hence simplifying the calculations and maximizing the function.
Log-Likelihood Function
Delving into the log-likelihood function, it's essentially the natural logarithm transformation of the likelihood function. This transformation is particularly useful because it turns products into sums, which are much easier to differentiate and work with when it comes to finding the maximum likelihood estimators.

For our Pareto distribution example, we initially have a product of probabilities which, when inputted into the log function, becomes a sum of logarithms. It is this sum that we manipulate to find the maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs). The process of differentiation often leads to simpler equations under the log-likelihood method. The derivatives are then set to zero to find the critical points, pointing towards where the function is maximized—and hence where the MLEs lie.

The calculated MLEs using the log-likelihood function can then be used directly to make inferences about the population from which the sample was taken and are integral to various statistical tools such as confidence intervals and hypothesis tests.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Recall that θ^=n/i=1nlogXi is the mle of θ for a Beta(θ,1) distribution. Also, W=i=1nlogXi has the gamma distribution Γ(n,1/θ). (a) Show that 2θW has a χ2(2n) distribution. (b) Using Part (a), find c1 and c2 so that $$P\left(c_{1}<\frac{2 \theta n}{\hat{\theta}}

Let X1,X2,,Xn be a random sample from a distribution with pdf \(f(x ; \theta)=\theta \exp \left\{-|x|^{\theta}\right\} / 2 \Gamma(1 / \theta),-\infty0 .\) Suppose Ω= θ:θ=1,2. Consider the hypotheses H0:θ=2 (a normal distribution) versus H1:θ=1 (a double exponential distribution). Show that the likelihood ratio test can be based on the statistic W=i=1n(Xi2|Xi|).

Let X be N(0,θ),0<θ< (a) Find the Fisher information I(θ). (b) If X1,X2,,Xn is a random sample from this distribution, show that the mle of θ is an efficient estimator of θ. (c) What is the asymptotic distribution of n(θ^θ)?

Let X1,X2,,Xn be a random sample from a Γ(α=3,β=θ) distribution, where 0<θ< (a) Show that the likelihood ratio test of H0:θ=θ0 versus H1:θθ0 is based upon the statistic W=i=1nXi. Obtain the null distribution of 2W/θ0. (b) For θ0=3 and n=5, find c1 and c2 so that the test that rejects H0 when Wc1 or Wc2 has significance level 0.05.

Let \(Y_{1}0\). (a) Show that Λ for testing H0:θ=θ0 against H1:θθ0 is Λ=(Yn/θ0)n, Ynθ0, and Λ=0, if Yn>θ0 (b) When H0 is true, show that 2logΛ has an exact χ2(2) distribution, not χ2(1). Note that the regularity conditions are not satisfied.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free