Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider the Bayes model \(X_{i} \mid \theta, i=1,2, \ldots n \sim\) iid with distribution Poisson \((\theta), \theta>0\) $$ \Theta \sim h(\theta) \propto \theta^{-1 / 2} $$ (a) Show that \(h(\theta)\) is in the class of Jeffrys priors. (b) Show that the posterior pdf of \(2 n \theta\) is the pdf of a \(\chi^{2}(2 y+1)\) distribution, where \(y=\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}\) (c) Use the posterior pdf of Part (b) to obtain a \((1-\alpha) 100 \%\) credible interval for \(\theta\) (d) Use the posterior pdf in Part (d) to determine a Bayesian test for the hypotheses \(H_{0}: \theta \geq \theta_{0}\) versus \(H_{1}: \theta<\theta_{0}\), where \(\theta_{0}\) is specified.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The given prior belongs to the class of Jeffrey's priors as it is a function of the square root of the Fisher Information. The posterior pdf for \(2n\theta\) follows a chi-square distribution with \(2y+1\) degrees of freedom. The credible interval for \(\theta\) was obtained as \([\frac{\chi^{2}_{\alpha/2, 2y+1}}{2n}, \frac{\chi^{2}_{1-\alpha/2, 2y+1}}{2n}]\). The Bayesian Test involves comparing \(\theta' = \frac{\chi^{2}_{\alpha, 2y+1}}{2n}\) to \(\theta_{0}\) to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis.

Step by step solution

01

Deriving Jeffrey's priors

The Jeffrey's prior for a parameter \(\theta\) can be defined as \(h(\theta) = c \times I^{1/2}( \theta)\), where \(I( \theta)\) is the Fisher Information for \(\theta\) and \(c\) is the normalization constant. For a Poisson distribution \(X_{i} \mid \theta, i=1,2, \ldots n\), the Fisher Information is \(I(\theta) = 1/\theta\). The square root of this yields \(I^{1/2}(\theta) = \theta^{-1/2}\). Therefore, \(h(\theta)\) is indeed in the class of Jeffrey's priors.
02

Deriving the posterior probability density function

The posterior distribution of a Bayes model is proportional to the product of the prior and likelihood functions. This leads to the following expression for the posterior pdf of \(2n\theta\): \(h(2n\theta) \propto (2n\theta)^{-1/2}\) X \(e^{-2n\theta}\). Besides, it is known that the pdf of a chi-square distribution with \(u\) degrees of freedom is: \(f(x) \propto x^{(u-2)/2} e^{-x/2}\) for \(x>0\). By comparing this expression with the derived posterior pdf, it can be concluded that this pdf follows a chi-square distribution with \(2y+1\) degrees of freedom, where \(y = \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}\).
03

Obtaining a credible interval

A \(100(1-\alpha)%\) credible interval for a chi-square distribution with \(u\) degrees of freedom is given by the interval between the \(\alpha/2\) and \(1-\alpha/2\) quantiles of that distribution, denoted \(\chi^{2}_{\alpha/2, u}\) and \(\chi^{2}_{1-\alpha/2, u}\) respectively. Therefore, a \(100(1-\alpha)%\) credible interval for \(2n\theta\) is \([\chi^{2}_{\alpha/2, 2y+1},\chi^{2}_{1-\alpha/2, 2y+1}]\). Since \(\theta = \frac{y}{n}\), this interval can be rewritten as \([\frac{\chi^{2}_{\alpha/2, 2y+1}}{2n}, \frac{\chi^{2}_{1-\alpha/2, 2y+1}}{2n}]\).
04

Determining a Bayesian test

The given null hypothesis is \(H_{0}: \theta \geq \theta_{0}\) and the alternative hypothesis is \(H_{1}: \theta<\theta_{0}\). This translates into considering \(2n\theta' < c\) as the rejection region for the null hypothesis, where \(c\) is a constant and \(\theta' = \frac{\chi^{2}_{\alpha, 2y+1}}{2n}\). If \(\theta' < \theta_{0}\), reject the null hypothesis. If \(\theta' >= \theta_{0}\), fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Jeffreys Prior
In Bayesian inference, choosing a prior distribution plays a crucial role. Jeffreys Prior is a popular choice due to its invariance properties and ability to handle parameter estimation objectively. It is calculated from the Fisher Information, which measures the amount of information that an observable variable carries about an unknown parameter. In the context of the Poisson distribution, Jeffreys Prior for the rate parameter \(\theta\) is determined as \( h(\theta) \propto \theta^{-1/2} \). This ensures that the prior is 'uninformative', providing no initial directional influence on the posterior distribution and thus allowing the data to speak for itself.
Posterior Distribution
The posterior distribution combines prior beliefs with evidence from the data, reflecting the updated beliefs or knowledge about the parameter after observing the data. For a Bayesian model involving Poisson-distributed data, you start with a Jeffreys Prior, given by \( h(\theta) \propto \theta^{-1/2} \), and the likelihood function. The result is a posterior that reflects a continuous PDF, often resembling a well-known distribution for practical inference. In our scenario, the posterior PDF for \( 2n \theta \) results in a \( \chi^2(2y+1) \) distribution. This transformation follows from identifying the mathematical form of the likelihood combined with the Jeffreys Prior.
Credible Interval
A credible interval in Bayesian statistics represents a range within which an unknown parameter, such as \(\theta\), lies with a certain probability, denoted as \( 1-\alpha \). Unlike frequentist confidence intervals, credible intervals naturally incorporate prior information. For our \(\chi^2\) posterior, a \(100(1-\alpha)\%\) credible interval for \(2n\theta\) can be determined between the \(\chi^2_{\alpha/2, 2y+1}\) and \(\chi^2_{1-\alpha/2, 2y+1}\) quantiles. Dividing these values by \(2n\) converts the interval back into terms of \(\theta\). This interval gives a meaningful range, considering prior and likelihood, illustrating where \(\theta\) is likely to be based on the observed data.
Bayesian Hypothesis Testing
In Bayesian analysis, hypothesis testing is used to compare different hypotheses based on observed data. For our exercise, we are tasked to test hypotheses about \(\theta\), specifically \(H_0: \theta \geq \theta_0\) against \(H_1: \theta < \theta_0\). To achieve this, we determine a critical region by examining \(2n\theta'\) and comparing it against a critical value \(c\), which is derived from the \(\chi^2\) posterior distribution for a given significance level \(\alpha\). If \(\theta' < \theta_0\), evidence suggests rejecting \(H_0\), indicating that the data supports the alternative hypothesis.
Poisson Distribution
The Poisson distribution is an essential statistical distribution used to model count data and rare events over a fixed interval. When involving Bayesian statistics, it plays a critical role in forming the likelihood component of the model. The parameter \(\theta\) represents the average rate at which events occur. The Poisson distribution, characterized by its discrete nature and dependence on \(\theta\), is pivotal for understanding event probabilities over time or space. Specifically, in Bayesian contexts, modeling with the Poisson distribution assists in examining event frequencies, ultimately impacting the formation of prior and posterior distributions.
Chi-Square Distribution
The chi-square distribution is a continuous distribution important in statistics, especially in hypothesis testing and constructing confidence (or credible) intervals. In our Bayesian framework, the posterior PDF for \(2n\theta\) emerged as a chi-square distribution with \(2y+1\) degrees of freedom. This property allows us to derive both credible intervals and decision rules for hypothesis testing with ease. The chi-square distribution is shaped by the degrees of freedom, which determine the variance and skewness. Knowing these properties makes it useful for a wide range of statistical applications, from goodness-of-fit tests to Bayesian analysis, where dealing with squared normal (or chi-squared) distributions is commonplace.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}\) be a random sample from a Cauchy distribution with pdf $$ f\left(x ; \theta_{1}, \theta_{2}\right)=\left(\frac{1}{\pi}\right) \frac{\theta_{2}}{\theta_{2}^{2}+\left(x-\theta_{1}\right)^{2}},-\infty

. Consider the following mixed discrete-continuous pdf for a random vector \((X, Y)\), (discussed in Casella and George, 1992): $$ f(x, y) \propto\left\\{\begin{array}{ll} \left(\begin{array}{l} n \\ x \end{array}\right) y^{x+\alpha-1}(1-y)^{n-x+\beta-1} & x=0,1, \ldots, n, 00\) and \(\beta>0\). (a) Show that this function is indeed a joint, mixed discrete continuous pdf by finding the proper constant of proportionality. (b) Determine the conditional pdfs \(f(x \mid y)\) and \(f(y \mid x)\). (c) Write the Gibbs sampler algorithm to generate random samples on \(X\) and \(Y\). (d) Determine the marginal distributions of \(X\) and \(Y\).

Consider the hierarchical Bayes model $$ \begin{aligned} Y & \sim b(n, p) ; \quad 00 \\ \theta & \sim \Gamma(1, a) ; a>0 \text { is specified. } \end{aligned} $$ (a) Assuming square error loss, write the Bayes estimate of \(p\) as in expression (11.5.3). Integrate relative to \(\theta\) first. Show that both numerator and denominator are expectations of a beta distribution with parameters \(y+1\) and \(n-y+1\) (b) Recall the discussion around expression (11.4.2). Write an explicit Monte Carlo algorithm to obtain the Bayes estimate in Part (a).

Consider the Bayes model \(X_{i} \mid \theta, i=1,2, \ldots n \sim\) iid with distribution \(b(1, \theta), 0<\theta<1\) $$ \Theta \sim h(\theta)=1 $$ (a) Obtain the posterior pdf. (b) Assume squared error loss and obtain the Bayes estimate of \(\theta\).

In Example 11.2.2 let \(n=30, \alpha=10\), and \(\beta=5\) so that \(\delta(y)=(10+y) / 45\) is the Bayes' estimate of \(\theta\). (a) If \(Y\) has a binomial distribution \(b(30, \theta)\), compute the risk \(E\left\\{[\theta-\delta(Y)]^{2}\right\\}\). (b) Find values of \(\theta\) for which the risk of Part (a) is less than \(\theta(1-\theta) / 30\), the risk associated with the maximum likelihood estimator \(Y / n\) of \(\theta\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free