Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Stefan’s law of radiation states that the rate of change of temperature of a body at Tdegrees Kelvin in a medium at M degrees Kelvin is proportional to M4-T4. That is dTdt=k(M4-T4),where kis a positive constant. Solve this equation using separation of variables. Explain why Newton’s law and Stefan’s law are nearly the same when Tis close to Mand Mis constant. [Hint: Factor M4-T4]


Short Answer

Expert verified

The results areT-M=CT+Me2arctanTM-4kM3t and When is T close to M then

1M4-T4=4M3(M-T)

dTdt=4M3k(M-T)=k1(M-T)

Step by step solution

01

Important concept.

According to Stefan’s law,

dTdt=kM4-T4,

02

Analyzing the given statement

According to Stefan’s law,

dTdt=kM4-T4,

Where, k is a positive constant, T degrees Kelvin is the temperature of the body degrees and M degrees Kelvin is the change in the temperature in a medium.

We have to solve this equation and to explain why Newton’s law and Stefan’s law are nearly the same when T is close to M and M is constant.

03

Factorizing M4-T4 in the given differential equation separating variables

dTdt=kM4-T4dTT4-M4=-kdt1T4-M4=1T2-M2T2+M2

Now using the partial fractions

Now,

12M2T2-M2-12M2T2+M2dT=-2kM2dtdT2MT-M-dT2MT+M-dTT2+M2=-2kM2t+C12MlnT-M-12MlnT+M-1MarctanTM=-2kM2t+ClnT-MT+M=2arctanTM-4kM3t+CT-MT+M=Ce2arctanTM-4kM3tT-M=CT+Me2arctanTM-4kM3t

When is T close to M then

1M4-T4=4M3M-TdTdt=4M3kM-T=k1M-T

Therefore, the results are T-M=CT+Me2arctanTM-4kM3tand When T is close to M then

1M4-T4=4M3M-T

dTdt=4M3kM-T=k1M-T

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Local versus Global Error. In deriving formula (4) for Euler’s method, a rectangle was used to approximate the area under a curve (see Figure 3.14). With

\({\bf{g(t) = f(t,f(t))}}\), this approximation can be written as \(\int\limits_{{{\bf{x}}_{\bf{n}}}}^{{{\bf{x}}_{{\bf{n + 1}}}}} {{\bf{g(t)dt}} \approx {\bf{hg(}}{{\bf{x}}_{\bf{n}}}{\bf{)}}} \)where \({\bf{h = }}{{\bf{x}}_{{\bf{n + 1}}}}{\bf{ - }}{{\bf{x}}_{\bf{n}}}\) .

  1. Show that if g has a continuous derivative that is bounded in absolute value by B, then the rectangle approximation has error\(\left( {\bf{O}} \right){{\bf{h}}^{\bf{2}}}\); that is, for some constant M, \(\left| {\int\limits_{{{\bf{x}}_{\bf{n}}}}^{{{\bf{x}}_{{\bf{n + 1}}}}} {{\bf{g(t)dt - hg(}}{{\bf{x}}_{\bf{n}}}{\bf{)}}} } \right| \le {\bf{M}}{{\bf{h}}^{\bf{2}}}\).This is called the local truncation error of the scheme. [Hint: Write \(\int\limits_{{{\bf{x}}_{\bf{n}}}}^{{{\bf{x}}_{{\bf{n + 1}}}}} {{\bf{g(t)dt - hg(}}{{\bf{x}}_{\bf{n}}}{\bf{)}}} {\bf{ = }}\int\limits_{{{\bf{x}}_{\bf{n}}}}^{{{\bf{x}}_{{\bf{n + 1}}}}} {\left[ {{\bf{g(t)dt - g(}}{{\bf{x}}_{\bf{n}}}{\bf{)}}} \right]{\bf{dt}}} \). Next, using the mean value theorem, show that\(\left| {{\bf{g(t)dt - g(}}{{\bf{x}}_{\bf{n}}}{\bf{)}}} \right| \le {\bf{B}}\left| {{\bf{t - }}{{\bf{x}}_{\bf{n}}}} \right|\) . Then integrate to obtain the error bound\(\left( {\frac{{\bf{B}}}{{\bf{2}}}} \right){{\bf{h}}^{\bf{2}}}\).]
  2. In applying Euler’s method, local truncation errors occur in each step of the process and are propagated throughout the further computations. Show that the sum of the local truncation errors in part (a) that arise after n steps is (O)h. This is the global error, which is the same as the[ss1] [m2] convergence rate of Euler’s method.


Use the Taylor methods of orders 2 and 4 with h = 0.25 to approximate the solution to the initial value problem y'=x+1-y,y(0)=1, at x = 1. Compare these approximations to the actual solutiony=x+e-x evaluated at x = 1.

Use the improved Euler’s method subroutine with step size h = 0.2 to approximate the solution toat the points x = 0, 0.2, 0.4, …., 2.0. Use your answers to make a rough sketch of the solution on [0, 2].

Show that C1cosωt+C2sinωt can be written in the form Acos(ωt-ϕ), where A=C12+C22and tanϕ=C2/C1. [Hint: Use a standard trigonometric identity with C1=Acosϕ,C2=Asinϕ.] Use this fact to verify the alternate representation (8) of F(t) discussed in Example 2 on page 104.

An RCcircuit with a1Ωresistor and a0.000001-Fcapacitor is driven by a voltageE(t)=sin100tV. If the initial capacitor voltage is zero, determine the subsequent resistor and capacitor voltages and the current.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free