Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The ankle-arm blood-pressure index (AAl) is defined as the ratio of ankle systolic blood pressure/arm systolic blood pressure and is used for the diagnosis of lower extremity arterial disease. A study was conducted to investigate whether the AAl can be used as a screening test for atherosclerotic diseases in general [20]. The subjects were 446 male workers in a copper smelter in Japan. Each subject had an AAl determination as well as an electrocardiogram (ECG). From the ECG, an S-T segment depression was defined as an S-T segment \(\geq 0.1 \mathrm{mV}\) below the baseline in at least 1 of 12 leads in a resting ECG. S-T segment depression is often used as one characterization of an abnormal ECG. The data in Table 3.22 were presented relating AAl to S-T segment depression. Suppose the reproducibility of the AAl test were improved using better technology. Would the sensitivity of the test increase, decrease, or remain the same? why?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The sensitivity would increase with improved reproducibility, as the test would consistently identify true positives.

Step by step solution

01

Introductory Knowledge

The Ankle-Arm Index (AAl) is a measure used to assess the presence of peripheral artery disease and is calculated by dividing the systolic blood pressure at the ankle by the systolic blood pressure at the arm. Sensitivity refers to the ability of a test to correctly identify those with the condition (true positive rate). Changes in reproducibility may affect a test’s sensitivity.
02

Understanding Reproducibility

Reproducibility is the degree of consistency in measurement across multiple tests or scenarios. Improved reproducibility means the test results will be more consistent, minimizing random variations and errors.
03

Impact on Sensitivity

If the test is more reproducible, the reliability of the test improves, leading to more consistent detection of the disease in individuals who have it. This improvement in the consistency of measurements increases the test's sensitivity by reducing false negatives.
04

Conclusion on Sensitivity Change

With enhanced reproducibility, the sensitivity of the AAI test is likely to increase. This is because a more reproducible test is better at consistently identifying true positive cases (those with the disease).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Ankle-Arm Blood-Pressure Index
The ankle-arm blood-pressure index (AAl) is a simple yet powerful tool in biostatistics, used primarily in the diagnosis of peripheral artery disease (PAD). It works by comparing the blood pressure measured at the ankle with the blood pressure at the arm. This comparison allows doctors to detect any discrepancies in blood flow, pointing toward possible circulatory issues, commonly associated with PAD.

PAD is a condition where arteries are narrowed, reducing blood flow, usually in the legs. This can lead to various health complications if undiagnosed. Determining the AAl is straightforward. It requires measuring systolic blood pressure at both the ankle and arm and then dividing the ankle systolic pressure by the arm systolic pressure. For example:

\[ \text{AAl} = \frac{\text{Systolic Blood Pressure at Ankle}}{\text{Systolic Blood Pressure at Arm}} \]

A result less than 1 indicates potential PAD, as lower blood pressure in the ankle compared to the arm suggests impaired circulation. Regular AAl testing can help in early detection and management of PAD, aiding in better health outcomes.
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sensitivity and specificity are crucial concepts in biostatistics, particularly in evaluating diagnostic tests. Sensitivity is the test's ability to identify true positive cases, those who have a certain condition, such as PAD.

A test with high sensitivity accurately detects a person with the disease, minimizing false negatives. In contrast, specificity is about correctly identifying true negative cases, meaning it ensures those without the disease are not mistakenly diagnosed.

Imagine a scenario where a biostatistics student is learning about tests. If a test is highly sensitive, it means few people with the condition are missed. For screening tests, like the AAl, high sensitivity is desirable to ensure affected individuals are identified for further evaluation.

Improved test technology can enhance both sensitivity and specificity by making the test more reliable and consistent. This ensures that the screening method used correctly identifies those with and without the disease, leading to better treatment decisions.
Peripheral Artery Disease
Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a common circulatory problem, often undiagnosed, where narrowed arteries reduce blood flow to the limbs. While it usually affects the legs, it can also occur in other areas of the body.

Poor circulation can lead to symptoms such as leg pain when walking (claudication), leg numbness or weakness, and slow healing sores.

PAD is primarily caused by atherosclerosis, a build-up of fatty deposits in the arteries which narrows them, inhibiting blood flow.

Detecting PAD early with tools like the ankle-arm blood-pressure index is essential. Early identification allows for lifestyle changes and treatments that can stave off serious complications, like heart attacks or strokes. By being aware of one's risk factors, such as smoking, diabetes, high blood pressure, and high cholesterol, and regularly screening through AAl, patients can manage their health proactively.
Electrocardiogram Analysis
Electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis is a fundamental tool in assessing heart health. It records the heart's electrical signals, providing insight into how well the heart is functioning.

Anomaly detection, such as S-T segment depression, is significant in diagnosing various heart conditions. The S-T segment is a part of the ECG waveform between the end of the S wave and the beginning of the T wave. A depression of the S-T segment \( \geq 0.1 \text{mV} \) below the baseline in any lead is a common indicator of abnormality, suggesting possible ischemia or other cardiac issues.

By assessing such abnormalities, ECG analysis aids in preventive healthcare, especially for those diagnosed with or at risk for cardiovascular disease. Coupling ECG findings with other diagnostic tools like the AAl supports comprehensive cardiovascular assessment, ensuring more accurate diagnoses and tailored healthcare interventions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that a disease is inherited via an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance. The implications of this mode of inheritance are that the children in a family each have a probability of 1 in 4 of inheriting the disease.What is the probability that neither sibling is affected?

A validation study is to be performed in a local hospital to check the accuracy of assessment of hospital-acquired infection (INF) following coronary bypass surgery (coronaryartery bypass graft, or CABG). In a given year the hospital performs 1100 CABG procedures. A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) algorithm is currently used to categorize subjects as having INF. To validate this algorithm, all CDC' subjects ( \(N=100\) ) and a random sample of CDC subjects \((N=1000)\) will be ascertained by an infectious-disease (ID) fellow and a detailed investigation will be performed, including a chart review and documentation of antibiotic use. Assume the ID-fellow's determination is correct.Suppose \(100 \mathrm{CDC}^{+}\) subjects are ascertained, of whom the ID fellow confirms \(80 .\) Because there are a large number of CDC subjects (1000), only a sample of 100 is studied, of whom the ID fellow confirms 90.What is the \(P V\) of the CDC algorithm?

Consider a family with a mother, father, and two children. Let \(A_{1}=\left\\{\text { mother has influenzal, } A_{2}=\\{ \text { father has influenzal, }\right.\) \(A_{3}=\left\\{\text { first child has influenzal, } A_{4}=\\{ \text { second child has influ- }\right.\) enzal, \(B=\) lat least one child has influenzal, \(C=\) lat least one parent has influenzal, and \(D=\\{\) at least one person in the family has influenzal.Express \(C\) in terms of \(A_{1}, A_{2}, A_{3},\) and \(A_{4}\).

The following data are derived from the Monthly Vital Statistics Report (October 1999 ) issued by the National Center for Health Statistics [10]. These data are pertinent to livebirths only.Suppose that infants are classified as low birthweight if they have a birthweight \(<2500 \mathrm{g}\) and as normal birthweight if they have a birthweight \(\geq 2500\) g. Suppose that infants are also classified by length of gestation in the following five categories: <28 weeks, 28-31 weeks, 32-35 weeks, 36 weeks, and \(\geq 37\) weeks. Assume the probabilities of the different periods of gestation are as given in Table \(3.8 .\)Also assume that the probability of low birthweight is .949 given a gestation of \(<28\) weeks, .702 given a gestation of \(28-31\) weeks, .434 given a gestation of \(32-35\) weeks, .201 given a gestation of 36 weeks, and .029 given a gestation of \(\geq 37\) weeks.3.51 Show that the events \\{length of gestation \(\leq 31\) weeks \(\mathrm{~ a n d ~ \\{ l o w ~ b i r t h w e i g h t \\} ~ a r e ~ n o t ~ i n d e p e n d e n t . ~}\).$$\begin{array}{lc} \hline \text { Length of gestation } & \text { Probability } \\ \hline<28 \text { weeks } & .007 \\\28-31 \text { weeks } & .012 \\\32-35 \text { weeks } & .050 \\\36 \text { weeks } & .037 \\\\\geq 37 \text { weeks } & .893\\\\\hline\end{array}$$

Piriformis syndrome is a pelvic condition that involves malfunction of the piriformis muscle (a deep buttock muscle), which often causes back and buttock pain with sciatica(pain radiating down the leg). An electrophysiologic test to detect piriformis syndrome involves measuring nerveconduction velocity (NCV) at two nerves in the leg (the tibial and peroneal nerves) with the leg flexed in a specific position. Increases in \(\mathrm{NCV}\) in these nerves are often associated with piriformis syndrome. The resulting test, called the flexion abduction and internal rotation (FAIR) test, is positive if the average \(\mathrm{NCV}\) in these nerves is delayed by \(2+\) seconds relative to normal.A small study compared the FAIR test results with patient self-reports of how they feel on a visual analog scale (VAS) of \(0-10,\) with 0 indicating no pain and 10 very severe pain. The results were as shown in Table 3.17 .Suppose physicians consider the FAIR test the gold standard, with a FAIR test result of \(\geq 2\) defined as a true positive and a FAlR test result of \(<2\) defined as a true negative. Suppose a VAS of \(\leq 4\) is considered a good clinical response based on self-report (a test-negative) and a VAS of \(\geq 5\) is considered a bad clinical response (a test-positive).What is the specificity of the VAS?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free