Chapter 2: Problem 37
Let \(X, Y\) be Banach spaces and \(T \in \mathcal{B}(X, Y)\). If \(T\) is one-to- one, is \(T^{*}\) necessarily onto? Hint: No, consider the identity map from \(\ell_{1}\) into \(\ell_{2}\).
Short Answer
Expert verified
No, as shown by the identity map from \(\ell_{1}\) into \(\ell_{2}\).
Step by step solution
01
Understand the problem
The problem is asking whether the adjoint operator of a one-to-one bounded linear operator on Banach spaces is necessarily onto.
02
Identify properties of the operators
Given that the operator \(T\) is one-to-one, we need to analyze whether \(T^*\), the adjoint operator, is onto.
03
Know the counterexample
Consider the identity map from \(\ell_{1}\) to \(\ell_{2}\). The space \(\ell_{1}\) consists of absolutely summable sequences, while \(\ell_{2}\) consists of square-summable sequences.
04
Understand the identity map properties
The identity map \(I: \ell_{1} \rightarrow \ell_{2}\) is one-to-one because each element in \(\ell_{1}\) maps uniquely to an element in \(\ell_{2}\).
05
Analyze the adjoint map
For \(T = I: \ell_{1} \rightarrow \ell_{2}\), the adjoint operator \(T^* = I^*: \ell_{2}^* \rightarrow \ell_{1}^*\). However, we need to realize that \(\ell_{2}^*\) can be identified with \(\ell_{2}\) and \(\ell_{1}^*\) with \(\ell_{\infty}\), the space of bounded sequences.
06
Conclusion from counterexample
Since \(T^*\) maps from \(\ell_{2}\) to \(\ell_{\infty}\), and \(\ell_{2} \) is a proper subspace of \(\ell_{\infty}\), the operator \(T^*\) is not onto.
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
adjoint operator
To get a good grasp of what an adjoint operator is, let's start with the basics. If you have a linear operator denoted by \( T \) that maps elements from one vector space, say \( X \), to another vector space, like \( Y \), the adjoint operator is an associated operator that essentially reverses the process while preserving certain properties.
Formally, if \( T \) is a bounded linear operator from a Banach space \( X \) to another Banach space \( Y \), the adjoint operator \( T^* \) takes each continuous linear functional on \( Y \) into a continuous linear functional on \( X \). This means that for each \( f \, \text{in} \, Y^* \), the dual space of \( Y \), \( T^* \) maps \( f \) to a new functional \( T^*f \) in the dual space of \( X \), denoted as \( X^* \).
Mathematically, this is expressed by the relation: \[ \forall x \, \text{in} \, X, \, \forall f \, \text{in} \, Y^*, \, (T^* f)(x) = f(Tx) \]
This relationship preserves the action of \(f\) after mapping through \( T \), ensuring the correspondence between \( X \) and \( Y \) via their respective dual spaces.
Formally, if \( T \) is a bounded linear operator from a Banach space \( X \) to another Banach space \( Y \), the adjoint operator \( T^* \) takes each continuous linear functional on \( Y \) into a continuous linear functional on \( X \). This means that for each \( f \, \text{in} \, Y^* \), the dual space of \( Y \), \( T^* \) maps \( f \) to a new functional \( T^*f \) in the dual space of \( X \), denoted as \( X^* \).
Mathematically, this is expressed by the relation: \[ \forall x \, \text{in} \, X, \, \forall f \, \text{in} \, Y^*, \, (T^* f)(x) = f(Tx) \]
This relationship preserves the action of \(f\) after mapping through \( T \), ensuring the correspondence between \( X \) and \( Y \) via their respective dual spaces.
bounded linear operator
Understanding bounded linear operators is crucial when working with Banach spaces. A linear operator \( T \) from one Banach space \( X \) to another \( Y \) is termed 'bounded' if there exists a constant \( C \) such that for all elements \( x \) in \( X \), the norm of \( Tx \) in \( Y \) is less than or equal to \( C \) times the norm of \( x \) in \( X \).
Formally, \( T \) is bounded if:\[ \forall x \, \text{in} \, X, \, \text{there exists a constant} \, C \, \text{such that} \, orm{T(x)}_Y \, \text{\leq} \, C orm{x}_X \]
This property ensures that the operator does not magnify input sequences disproportionately, making it stable and well-behaved. In simpler terms, a bounded linear operator has control over the output based on the input, which is particularly useful when dealing with functional analysis.
Formally, \( T \) is bounded if:\[ \forall x \, \text{in} \, X, \, \text{there exists a constant} \, C \, \text{such that} \, orm{T(x)}_Y \, \text{\leq} \, C orm{x}_X \]
This property ensures that the operator does not magnify input sequences disproportionately, making it stable and well-behaved. In simpler terms, a bounded linear operator has control over the output based on the input, which is particularly useful when dealing with functional analysis.
identity map
An identity map, in the context of Banach spaces, is quite intuitive. It is the simplest type of linear operator where each element in the space maps to itself. Denoted generally as \( I \), for any Banach space \( X \), the identity map \( I: X \rightarrow X \) satisfies \( I(x) = x \) for all \( x \) in \( X \).
The identity map is always a bounded linear operator because the norm of \( Ix \) remains unchanged, i.e., it is equal to the norm of \( x \).
Considering our specific problem of spaces \( \ell_1 \) (absolutely summable sequences) and \( \ell_2 \) (square-summable sequences), the identity map from \( \ell_1 \) to \( \ell_2 \) would imply that each element in \( \ell_1 \) is also viewed as an element in \( \ell_2 \), even though \( \ell_2 \) does not include all elements of \( \ell_1 \).
Moreover, as highlighted in the step-by-step solution, considering the topological duals where \( \ell_{2}^{*}= \ell_{2} \) and \( \ell_{1}^{*}=\text{\ell}_{\text{\infty}} \), the identity map does not ensure that the adjoint map is onto, indicating the depth and subtlety in Banach space theory.
The identity map is always a bounded linear operator because the norm of \( Ix \) remains unchanged, i.e., it is equal to the norm of \( x \).
Considering our specific problem of spaces \( \ell_1 \) (absolutely summable sequences) and \( \ell_2 \) (square-summable sequences), the identity map from \( \ell_1 \) to \( \ell_2 \) would imply that each element in \( \ell_1 \) is also viewed as an element in \( \ell_2 \), even though \( \ell_2 \) does not include all elements of \( \ell_1 \).
Moreover, as highlighted in the step-by-step solution, considering the topological duals where \( \ell_{2}^{*}= \ell_{2} \) and \( \ell_{1}^{*}=\text{\ell}_{\text{\infty}} \), the identity map does not ensure that the adjoint map is onto, indicating the depth and subtlety in Banach space theory.