Let \(K, C\) be subsets of a normed space \(X\).
(i) Show that if \(K, C\) are closed, \(K+C\) need not be closed.
(ii) Show that if \(K\) is compact and \(C\) is closed, then \(K+C\) is closed. Is
\(\operatorname{con}(K \cup C)\) closed?
(iii) Show that if \(K\) is compact and \(C\) is bounded and closed, then the set
\(\operatorname{conv}(K \cup C)\) is closed.
Hint: (i): Consider \(K=\\{(x, 0) ; x \in \mathbf{R}\\}\) and
\(C=\left\\{\left(x, \frac{1}{x}\right) ; x>0\right\\}\).
(ii): If \(x_{n}=k_{n}+c_{n} \rightarrow y\) for \(k_{n} \in K, c_{n} \in C\),
then by compactness assume \(k_{n} \rightarrow k\); then also \(c_{n}=x_{n}-k_{n}
\rightarrow(y-k)\) and use that \(C\) is closed. For a negative answer to
\(\operatorname{conv}(K \cup C)\), see the previous exercise.
(iii): If \(x_{n}=\lambda_{n} k_{n}+\left(1-\lambda_{n}\right) c_{n}
\rightarrow x\) for \(k_{n} \in K, c_{n} \in C, \lambda \in[0,1]\)
find a subsequence \(n_{i}\) such that \(k_{n,} \rightarrow k\) and
\(\lambda_{n_{i}} \rightarrow \lambda\). If \(\lambda=1\), then by boundedness
\(\left(1-\lambda_{n_{i}}\right) c_{n_{1}} \rightarrow 0\), and \(x=k \in K .\) If
\(\lambda \neq 1, c_{n_{i}} \rightarrow \frac{x-\lambda k}{1-\lambda} \in C\)
by closedness of \(C\).