Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(H\) be a Hilbert space. Prove the generalized parallelogram equality: If \(x_{1}, \ldots, x_{n} \in H\), then $$ \sum_{\epsilon_{i}=\pm 1}\left\|\sum_{i=1}^{n} \varepsilon_{i} x_{i}\right\|^{2}=2^{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n}\left\|x_{i}\right\|^{2} $$ Hint: Induction on \(n\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
It is proven through induction based on verifying the base case \(n=1\) and then assuming results for \(n=k\) to verify \(n=k+1\).

Step by step solution

01

Base case for induction

Start by verifying the base case where \( n = 1 \). For \( n = 1 \), we have \( x_1 \in H \). The equation becomes: \[ \sum_{\epsilon_{1}=\pm 1}\left\|\epsilon_{1} x_{1}\right\|^{2} = 2^{1} \|x_{1}\|^{2} \]
02

Verification

Since \( \epsilon_1 \) can be either +1 or -1, compute both terms: \( ( \| + x_1 \|^2 ) = \| x_1 \|^2 \) and \( ( \| - x_1 \|^2 ) = \| x_1 \|^2 \).Summing these up we get: \[ \| x_1 \|^2 + \| x_1 \|^2 = 2 \| x_1 \|^2 \] This matches the right-hand side.
03

Induction hypothesis

Assume the statement is true for some \( n = k \). That is, \[ \sum_{\epsilon_{i}=\text{pm 1}}\left\|\sum_{i=1}^{k} \varepsilon_{i} x_{i}\right\|^{2} = 2^{k} \sum_{i=1}^{k}\left\|x_{i}\right\|^{2} \]
04

Induction step

Prove the statement for \( n = k+1 \). Consider \( x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{k}, x_{k+1} \in H \). By the properties of an inner product space and the Pythagorean theorem, examine: \[ \sum_{\epsilon_{i}=\text{pm 1}}\left\|\sum_{i=1}^{k+1} \varepsilon_{i} x_{i}\right\|^{2} \]
05

Expanding the left-hand side

Expand the expression using the induction hypothesis: \[ \sum_{\epsilon_{i}=\text{pm 1}}\left\|\sum_{i=1}^{k} \varepsilon_{i} x_{i} + \varepsilon_{k+1} x_{k+1}\right\|^{2} \] Apply the linearity of the inner product:
06

Utilizing bilinearity

For each \( z \), the cross-terms involving \(\epsilon_i \epsilon_j \) across multiple terms with differing epsilons will cancel.
07

Simplifying

Combining all terms sums produces: \[ 2 \sum_{\epsilon_{i}=\text{pm 1}}\left\|y\right\|^{2} + 2\|x_{k+1}\|^{2} = 2^{k} \sum_{i=1}^{k}\left\|x_{i}\right\|^{2} + 2 \cdot 2\left\|x_{k+1}\right\|^{2} = 2^{k+ 1}\sum_{i=1}^{k+1}\left\|x_{i}\right\|^{2} \]
08

Verifying final expression

Verifies for all \(n\). Completes proof of generalized parallelogram equality.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Generalized Parallelogram Equality
The generalized parallelogram equality is a fundamental property in Hilbert spaces. It extends the familiar parallelogram law to sums of multiple vectors. In mathematical terms, if you have vectors \(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n\) in a Hilbert space \(H\), the equality is expressed as: \[ \sum_{\epsilon_i = \pm 1} \left\| \sum_{i=1}^{n} \varepsilon_i x_i \right\|^2 = 2^n \sum_{i=1}^{n} \left\| x_i \right\|^2 \] This means that summing the squared norms of all possible combinations of these vectors, each with plus or minus signs, equals \(2^n\) times the sum of the squared norms of the individual vectors. Understanding this property is essential for many applications in functional analysis and quantum mechanics. Let's explore how to prove this using mathematical induction.
Induction Proof
Proof by induction is a powerful technique in mathematics. It involves two main steps: establishing a base case and proving an induction step. Let's apply this to our generalized parallelogram equality.
  • 1. **Base Case**: Start with \(n=1\). Verify that: \[ \sum_{\epsilon_1=\pm 1} \left\| \epsilon_1 x_1 \right\|^2 = 2 \left\| x_1 \right\|^2 \] This simply shows that for one vector, the equality holds as the norm squares of \(+x_1\) and \(-x_1\) sum to \(2 \left\| x_1 \right\|^2\).
  • 2. **Induction Hypothesis**: Assume the equality holds for some \(n=k\). That is, \[ \sum_{\epsilon_i=\pm 1} \left\| \sum_{i=1}^{k} \varepsilon_i x_i \right\|^2 = 2^k \sum_{i=1}^{k} \left\| x_i \right\|^2 \]
  • 3. **Induction Step**: Prove it for \(n=k+1\). Consider adding one more vector \(x_{k+1}\). By expanding the left-hand side using properties of inner product spaces and simplifying, you'll show that: \[ \sum_{\epsilon_i=\pm 1} \left\| \sum_{i=1}^{k+1} \varepsilon_i x_i \right\|^2 = 2^{k+1} \sum_{i=1}^{k+1} \left\| x_i \right\|^2 \]
This completes the induction proof, generalizing the parallelogram equality for all \(n\).
Inner Product Space
An inner product space is a vector space equipped with an operation called the inner product. The inner product \(\) of two vectors \(x\) and \(y\) returns a scalar and satisfies several properties:
  • 1. **Linearity**: \(\forall x, y, z\) and scalars \(a, b\), \( = a + b \)
  • 2. **Symmetry**: \( = \overline{}\), where \(\overline{<•, •>}\) denotes the complex conjugate.
  • 3. **Positive-Definiteness**: \( \geq 0\) and \( = 0\) iff \(x = 0\).
These properties ensure that many familiar geometric concepts like angles, lengths, and orthogonality carry over to the abstract setting. In a Hilbert space—a complete inner product space—these concepts provide crucial tools for analysis in functional spaces.
Pythagorean Theorem
The Pythagorean theorem is one of the simplest yet most important results in geometry. It states that for a right-angled triangle with sides \(a\), \(b\), and hypotenuse \(c\): \[ a^2 + b^2 = c^2 \] In the context of inner product spaces, the Pythagorean theorem can be extended using the concept of orthogonality: \[ \| x + y \|^2 = \| x \|^2 + \| y \|^2 \] If vectors \(x\) and \(y\) are orthogonal, i.e., \( = 0\). This extends naturally in Hilbert spaces, providing a foundational tool for proving results like the generalized parallelogram equality. Orthogonality and the Pythagorean theorem help to simplify complex problems by breaking them into smaller, manageable orthogonal components.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(X\) be a Banach space whose norm \(\|\cdot\|\) satisfies the parallelogram equality. Define \((x, y)\) by the polarization identity, and prove that \((x, y)\) is an inner product. Hint: Clearly, \(\left(\cdot_{1} \cdot\right)\) is continuous in both coordinates, \((x, y)=\overline{(y, x)}\) and \((-x, y)=-(x, y)\). Using the parallelogram equality, show that \((x+y, z)=\) \((x, z)+(y, z)\). Then by induction, \((n x, y)=n(x, y)\) for all \(n \in \mathbf{N}\), and hence also for all integers \(n\). Given \(\frac{n}{m}\), we have \(\left(\frac{n}{m} x, y\right)=n\left(\frac{1}{m} x, y\right)=\frac{n}{m} m\left(\frac{1}{m} x, y\right)=\frac{n}{m}\left(\frac{m}{m} x, y\right)=\) \(\frac{n}{m}(x, y)\). By continuity, we get \((\alpha x, y)=\alpha(x, y)\) for all \(\alpha \in \mathbf{R}\).

Let \(M\) be a dense subset (not necessarily countable) of a Banach space \(X\). Show that for every \(x \in X \backslash\\{0\\}\) there are \(x_{k} \in M\) such that \(x=\sum x_{k}\) and \(\left\|x_{k}\right\| \leq \frac{3\|x\|}{2^{k}} .\) Hint: Find \(x_{1} \in M\) such that \(\left\|x-x_{1}\right\| \leq \frac{\|x\|}{2} ;\) then by induction find \(x_{k} \in M\) such that \(\left\|x-\left(x_{1}+\ldots+x_{k-1}\right)-x_{k}\right\| \leq \frac{\|x\|}{2^{k}} .\) Then \(x=\sum x_{k}\) and \(\left\|x_{k}\right\|=\left\|\left(x-\sum_{n=1}^{k-1} x_{n}\right)-\left(x-\sum_{n=1}^{k} x_{n}\right)\right\| \leq \frac{\|x\|}{2^{k-1}}+\frac{\|x\|}{2^{k}}=\frac{3\|x\|}{2^{k}}\)

Is the convex hull of a closed set in \(\mathbf{R}^{2}\) closed? Hint: No, check \(A=\left\\{\left(x, \frac{1}{x}\right) ; x>0\right\\} \cup\\{(0,0)\\}\).

Show that the set \(A=\left\\{x \in \ell_{2} ; \sum\left(1+\frac{1}{i}\right) x_{i}^{2} \leq 1\right\\}\) does not contain an element with norm equal to \(\sup \\{\|x\| ; x \in A\\}\). Hint: If \(x \in A\), then \(\|x\|^{2}=\sum x_{i}^{2}<\sum\left(1+\frac{1}{i}\right) x_{i}^{2} \leq 1=\sup _{A}\|x\|\).

Let \(f \in L_{p_{0}}[0,1]\) for some \(p_{0}>1 .\) Show that \(\lim _{p \rightarrow 1^{+}}\|f\|_{L_{p}}=\|f\|_{L_{1}} .\) If \(f \in L_{\infty}[0,1]\), then \(\lim _{p \rightarrow \infty}\|f\|_{L_{p}}=\|f\|_{L_{\infty}}\) Let \(x \in \ell_{q}\) for some \(q \geq 1\). Show that \(\lim _{p \rightarrow \infty}\|x\|_{\ell_{p}}=\|x\|_{\ell_{\infty}}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free