Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

XYZ Company is considering digging an oil well. The cost of the well is \(\$ 50,000\). If the well is successful \(X Y Z\) will make a profit of \(\$ 400,000\), otherwise zero. The probability of the well being successful is \(0.1 .\) Is it worthwhile to dig the well?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The expected value of the profit for the oil well is \(40,000, which is less than the cost of digging the well (\)50,000). Therefore, it is not worthwhile for XYZ Company to dig the well, as they are more likely to lose money on the investment than to profit from it.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the information given in the problem.

We are given the following pieces of information: - Cost of the well: $50,000 - Profit if successful: $400,000 - Probability of success: 0.1
02

Calculate the expected value of the profit.

The expected value (EV) of the profit is given by the probability of success multiplied by the profit if successful, plus the probability of failure multiplied by the profit if the well is unsuccessful (in this case, zero). Expected value (EV) = (probability of success × profit if successful) + (probability of failure × profit if unsuccessful) Here we have, the probability of success = 0.1, the probability of failure = 1 - 0.1 = 0.9. Also, the profit if successful = \(400,000, and the profit if unsuccessful = \)0. EV = (0.1 × \(400,000) + (0.9 × \)0)
03

Calculate the expected value.

Now, calculate the expected value using the given values. EV = (0.1 × \(400,000) + (0.9 × \)0) = $40,000 The expected value of the profit is $40,000.
04

Compare the expected value to the cost of the well.

Lastly, compare the expected value of the profit (\(40,000) to the cost of digging the well (\)50,000). Since the expected value of the profit is less than the cost of the well, it is not worthwhile to dig the well. The company is more likely to lose money on the investment than to profit from it.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Probability Theory
Understanding probability is key to making predictions about future events. In our exercise, the concept of probability helps XYZ Company assess their chances of success in digging an oil well. Probability measures how likely an event is to occur. In this scenario, the probability of success is 0.1, which means there is a 10% chance that the well will be successful.

Probability is often expressed as a fraction or a decimal. It ranges between 0 and 1, where 0 means the event will not happen, and 1 means it will definitely happen. In our oil well problem, the probability of success is low, suggesting that the likelihood of achieving profit from the well is also low.

By calculating the probability of failure as well (1 - probability of success), we determine the chance of not finding oil is 90%. Understanding these probabilities allows us to make informed predictions about the future outcomes of investments, as seen in this decision-making process.
Investment Decision Analysis
Investment decision analysis involves evaluating the potential outcomes and risks associated with investment opportunities. It is an essential process for companies, like XYZ, to determine if a project is financially viable. In our exercise, the focus is on deciding whether to dig the oil well.

  • Expected Value (EV): Calculating the expected value is a primary step in investment decision analysis. It involves assessing the potential returns of an investment against the likelihood of those returns.
  • Risk Assessment: We must also consider the risks involved, like the high probability of failure.
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing the expected return to the costs involved is crucial for making wise investment decisions.


Here, the company calculates a potential expected value of $40,000, but the cost to drill is $50,000, indicating a loss. Such an analysis helps the company determine that this investment may not be worth pursuing, as the expected profit does not cover the cost, portraying a rational and data-driven approach to decision-making.
Profit and Loss Analysis
Profit and loss analysis is a fundamental tool for determining the economic viability of a business decision. In our scenario with XYZ Company, this analysis helps in deciding if the venture will be profitable. To find out, it’s important to look at various factors:

  • Profit Potential: How much could be earned if the project succeeds?
  • Cost Analysis: What are the expenses involved in the project?
  • Expected Outcomes: How do different scenarios affect the financial projections?


In the oil well example, the profit if successful stands at $400,000. However, the high expense of $50,000 for drilling gives a negative indication when compared to the expected value of only $40,000. This detailed profit and loss analysis enables XYZ to conclude that the anticipated loss overshadows the slim chance of success, thus the venture is economically unsound.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(\mathrm{X}\) be a random variable whose value is determined by the flip of a fair coin. If the coin lands heads up \(\mathrm{X}=1\), if tails then \(\mathrm{X}=0\). Find the expected value of \(\mathrm{X}\).

For a large sample, the distribution of \(\underline{X}\) is always approximately normal. Find the probability that a random sample mean lies within a) one standard error of the mean. b) two standard errors.

Consider a probability distribution for random orientations in which the probability of an observation in a region on the surface of the unit hemisphere is proportional to the area of that region. Two angles, \(u\) and \(v\), will determine the position of an observation. It can be shown that the position of an observation is jointly distributed with density function $$ \begin{array}{r} \mathrm{f}(\mathrm{u}, \mathrm{v})=[\\{\sin \mathrm{u}\\} /\\{2 \pi\\}] \quad 0<\mathrm{u}<2 \pi \\ 0<\mathrm{u}<\pi / 2 . \end{array} $$ Two new variables, \(\mathrm{X}\) and \(\mathrm{Y}\) are defined, where $$ \mathrm{X}=\sin \mathrm{u} \cos \mathrm{v} $$ $$ \mathrm{Y}=\sin \mathrm{u} \sin \mathrm{v} $$ Find the joint density function of \(\mathrm{X}\) and \(\mathrm{Y}\).

A certain drug is thought to have an effect on the ability to perform mental arithmetic. The quantity of the drug used may vary from 0 to 100 milligrams. One possible experiment would be to test all possible levels of this drug on groups of subjects and then use analysis of variance to detect differences. Because of limited funds, only six levels of the drug may be tested. Describe two methods of implementing and analyzing this experiment.

Suppose we want to compare 2 treatments for curing acne (pimples). Suppose, too, that for practical reasons we are obliged to use a presenting sample of patients. We might then decide to alternate the 2 treatments strictly according to the order in which the patients arrive \((\mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B}, \mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B}\), and so on). Let us agree to measure the cure in terms of weeks to reach \(90 \%\) improvement (this may prove more satisfactory than awaiting \(100 \%\) cure, for some patients, may not be completely cured by either treatment, and many patients might not report back for review when they are completely cured). This design would ordinarily call for Wilcoxon's Sum of Ranks Test, but there is one more thing to be considered: severity of the disease. For it could happen that a disproportionate number of mild cases might end up, purely by chance, in one of the treatment groups, which could bias the results in favor of this group, even if there was no difference between the 2 treatments. It would clearly be better to compare the 2 treatments on comparable cases, and this can be done by stratifying the samples. Suppose we decide to group all patients into one or other of 4 categories \- mild, moderate, severe, and very severe. Then all the mild cases would be given the 2 treatments alternatively and likewise with the other groups. Given the results tabulated below (in order of size, not of their actual occurrence), is the evidence sufficient to say that one treatment is better than the other? $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Category } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Treatment A } \\ \text { Weeks } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Treatment B } \\ \text { Weeks } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { (I) Mild } & 2 & 2 \\ & 3 & 4 \\ \hline \text { (II) Moderate } & 3 & 4 \\ & 5 & 6 \\ & 6 & 7 \\ & 10 & 9 \\ \hline \text { (III) Severe } & 6 & 9 \\ & 8 & 14 \\ & 11 & 14 \\ \hline \text { (IV) Very severe } & 8 & 12 \\ & 10 & 14 \\ & 11 & 15 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free