Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The results of a survey show that the 518 respondents may be categorized as 0 0 Protestant - Republicans Protestant - Democrats Protestant - Independents Catholic - Republicans Catholic - Democrats Catholic-Independents Jewish - Republicans Jewish - Democrat Jewish - Independents \begin{tabular}{c} 126 \\ 71 \\ 19 \\ 61 \\ 93 \\ 14 \\ 38 \\ 69 \\ 27 \\ \hline \end{tabular} 38 6 Given this data construct a contingency table.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The contingency table for the given data is: | | Republican | Democrat | Independent | Total | |----------------|------------|----------|-------------|-------| | Protestant | 126 | 71 | 19 | 216 | | Catholic | 61 | 93 | 14 | 168 | | Jewish | 38 | 69 | 27 | 134 | | **Total** | 225 | 233 | 60 | **518**|

Step by step solution

01

Create a Contingency Table

A contingency table is a table that displays the frequencies of data in different categories. In this case, the categories are the different religions and political affiliations. We can create a contingency table by writing the given data in the format of a table with rows representing religions and columns representing political affiliations.
02

Label Rows and Columns

Our table will have 3 rows for the religions (Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish) and 3 columns for the political affiliations (Republican, Democrat, and Independent), plus an additional row and column for the totals.
03

Fill in the Table with Given Data

Now that we have our rows and columns labeled, we can fill in the table with the data provided in the survey results: - Protestant - Republican: 126 - Protestant - Democrat: 71 - Protestant - Independent: 19 - Catholic - Republican: 61 - Catholic - Democrat: 93 - Catholic - Independent: 14 - Jewish - Republican: 38 - Jewish - Democrat: 69 - Jewish - Independent: 27 We then add the totals for each row and column in the last row and column. Here is the completed contingency table: | | Republican | Democrat | Independent | Total | |----------------|------------|----------|-------------|-------| | Protestant | 126 | 71 | 19 | 216 | | Catholic | 61 | 93 | 14 | 168 | | Jewish | 38 | 69 | 27 | 134 | | **Total** | 225 | 233 | 60 | **518**|

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Survey Data Analysis
Survey data analysis is an essential process for extracting meaningful insights from responses collected during surveys. These insights can inform decision-making and understanding of specific populations or phenomena. The survey data, often comprising multiple choice or categorical responses, needs to be organized for clarity and comprehensibility.

When analyzing survey data, researchers often begin by summarizing the gathered information using various descriptive statistics, like frequencies and percentages. One common technique is to organize the data into a contingency table, which helps detect patterns and relationships between different categorical variables. For example, survey results showing preferences or characteristics of respondents, like the exercise on religious and political affiliations, can be cross-tabulated to reveal how these affiliations interact.

Improving comprehension of survey analysis can involve simplifying complex data into visual formats like graphs or tables, ensuring that important trends and comparisons are made clear. Clear labels and a logical structure can significantly aid interpretation, making it easier for students to grasp the underlying patterns and conclusions.
Categorical Data Representation
Categorical data representation refers to the methods used to visualize or summarize data that can be divided into groups or categories. Unlike numerical data, categorical data represent characteristics such as religion, gender, or political preference—and are not inherently numerical. Methods of representation include tables, charts, and graphs that aid in summarizing and analyzing the data.

In the context of our exercise, the categorical data includes the respondents' religious and political affiliations. To effectively represent this data, one would organize it in a way that allows comparisons and pattern recognition. A contingency table serves this very purpose; it arranges categorical data into rows and columns, facilitating an understanding of the relationship between variables.

A clear explanation and appropriate labeling of these categories are crucial when developing instructional content. Including visual aids such as pie charts or bar graphs along with the contingency table can further improve understanding by providing a visual summary of the data's distribution.
Cross Tabulation
Cross tabulation, commonly referred to as 'crosstab', is a statistical tool used to analyze the relationship between multiple categorical variables. It displays the frequency distribution of variables simultaneously and can highlight significant interactions between them. This method is invaluable for survey data analysis, where it's essential to explore how different categories (like religious beliefs and political affiliations) relate to each other.

For the survey results in the exercise, cross tabulation is used to organize the data into a contingency table where one axis represents religious categories, and the other represents political affiliations. By filling in the number of respondents who fall into each intersection of these categories, patterns may emerge that provide valuable insights. For example, the crosstab might reveal a higher number of Protestant Republicans than Protestant Democrats, indicating a possible trend.

To enhance understanding, explanations of crosstab outcomes should focus on meaningful conclusions derived from the data. Highlighting significant results and providing interpretations can make the information more accessible, enabling students to quickly understand the practical implications of the findings.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that the life of a certain light bulb is exponentially distributed with mean 100 hours. If 10 such light bulbs are installed simultaneously, what is the distribution of the life of the light bulb that fails first, and what is its expected life? Let \(\mathrm{X}_{\mathrm{i}}\) denote the life of the ith light bulb; then \(\mathrm{Y}_{1}=\min \left[\mathrm{X}_{1}, \ldots, \mathrm{X}_{10}\right]\) is the life of the light bulb that falls first. Assume that the \(\mathrm{X}_{1}\) 's are independent.

A reading test is given to an elementary school class that consists of 12 Anglo-American children and 10 MexicanAmerican children. The results of the test are \(-\) AngloAmerican children: \(\underline{\mathrm{X}}_{1}=74, \mathrm{~S}_{1}=8 ;\) Mexican-American children: \(\underline{X}_{2}=70, \mathrm{~S}_{2}=10 .\) Is the difference between the means of the two groups significant at the \(.05\) level of significance?

The following experiment was performed to determine the effect of two advertising campaigns on three kinds of cake mixes. Sales of each mix were recorded after the first advertising compaign and then after the second advertising campaign. This experiment was repeated 3 times for each advertising campaign with the following results: $$ \begin{array}{|l|l|l|} \hline & \text { Campaign 1 } & \text { Campaign 2 } \\ \hline \text { Mix 1 } & 574,564,550 & 1092,1086,1065 \\ \hline \text { Mix 2 } & 524,573,551 & 1028,1073,998 \\ \hline \text { Mix 3 } & 576,540,592 & 1066,1045,1055 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Set up an ANOVA table for this problem and find the appropriate sums of squares, degrees of freedom and mean squares.

Suppose we want to compare 2 treatments for curing acne (pimples). Suppose, too, that for practical reasons we are obliged to use a presenting sample of patients. We might then decide to alternate the 2 treatments strictly according to the order in which the patients arrive \((\mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B}, \mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B}\), and so on). Let us agree to measure the cure in terms of weeks to reach \(90 \%\) improvement (this may prove more satisfactory than awaiting \(100 \%\) cure, for some patients, may not be completely cured by either treatment, and many patients might not report back for review when they are completely cured). This design would ordinarily call for Wilcoxon's Sum of Ranks Test, but there is one more thing to be considered: severity of the disease. For it could happen that a disproportionate number of mild cases might end up, purely by chance, in one of the treatment groups, which could bias the results in favor of this group, even if there was no difference between the 2 treatments. It would clearly be better to compare the 2 treatments on comparable cases, and this can be done by stratifying the samples. Suppose we decide to group all patients into one or other of 4 categories \- mild, moderate, severe, and very severe. Then all the mild cases would be given the 2 treatments alternatively and likewise with the other groups. Given the results tabulated below (in order of size, not of their actual occurrence), is the evidence sufficient to say that one treatment is better than the other? $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Category } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Treatment A } \\ \text { Weeks } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Treatment B } \\ \text { Weeks } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { (I) Mild } & 2 & 2 \\ & 3 & 4 \\ \hline \text { (II) Moderate } & 3 & 4 \\ & 5 & 6 \\ & 6 & 7 \\ & 10 & 9 \\ \hline \text { (III) Severe } & 6 & 9 \\ & 8 & 14 \\ & 11 & 14 \\ \hline \text { (IV) Very severe } & 8 & 12 \\ & 10 & 14 \\ & 11 & 15 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

XYZ Company is considering digging an oil well. The cost of the well is \(\$ 50,000\). If the well is successful \(X Y Z\) will make a profit of \(\$ 400,000\), otherwise zero. The probability of the well being successful is \(0.1 .\) Is it worthwhile to dig the well?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free