Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

If there is a significant difference between \(p_{1}\) and \(p_{2}\) and between \(p_{2}\) and \(p_{3},\) can you conclude that there is a significant difference between \(p_{1}\) and \(p_{3} ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
There isn't enough information to infer a significant difference between \( p_1 \) and \( p_3 \); a direct test is needed.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

We have three proportions: \( p_1 \), \( p_2 \), and \( p_3 \). We are given that there is a significant difference between \( p_1 \) and \( p_2 \), and there is also a significant difference between \( p_2 \) and \( p_3 \). We need to determine if this implies a significant difference between \( p_1 \) and \( p_3 \).
02

Analyzing the Relationship

In hypothesis testing, saying there is a significant difference means the difference is large or substantial based on statistical metrics (like p-values or confidence intervals). However, it does not always mean that individual conclusions can be combined to make a new significant conclusion.
03

Using the Transitive Property

The transitive property (if \( a = b \) and \( b = c \), then \( a = c \)) does not generally apply to statistical significance. Just because \( p_1 \) is significantly different from \( p_2 \) and \( p_2 \) is significantly different from \( p_3 \), it does not necessarily follow that \( p_1 \) is significantly different from \( p_3 \). Statistical significance depends on the context and specific metrics comparing \( p_1 \) and \( p_3 \) directly.
04

Conclusion

We cannot conclude anything about the significance between \( p_1 \) and \( p_3 \) based solely on the information that both pairs, \( p_1 \) with \( p_2 \) and \( p_2 \) with \( p_3 \), are significantly different. A direct test between \( p_1 \) and \( p_3 \) is required to make a proper determination.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a critical concept in understanding whether a result from a data analysis is likely to be true and not due to chance. When researchers say that there is a "significant difference" between two proportions or means, it implies that the observed difference is unlikely to have occurred by random variation alone.

This determination depends on both the size of the difference and the variability of the data. In practice, statistical significance offers a way to assert with confidence that an effect exists in the population from which the sample was drawn. However, it's important to remember that statistical significance does not equate to practical or real-world importance.

Keep in mind:
  • Statistical significance is context-dependent.
  • It requires a pre-determined threshold (usually 0.05).
  • It does not imply causation or practical relevance.
Understanding P-Values
P-values are a cornerstone of statistical hypothesis testing. The p-value measures the probability of observing a test statistic at least as extreme as the one observed in the data, under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true.

In simple terms, a small p-value (typically less than 0.05) indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis, suggesting that an observed effect is statistically significant. Conversely, a high p-value suggests insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. It’s vital to approach p-values cautiously, avoiding common misunderstandings:

  • P-values do not measure the probability that the null hypothesis is true.
  • They do not indicate the size of an effect or its importance.
  • Context matters; what's significant in one setting may not be in another.
Role of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals provide a range of plausible values for a population parameter. Unlike a single p-value, a confidence interval gives more information about the direction and strength of an effect. They are typically expressed with a confidence level, such as 95%, indicating that in 95 out of 100 experiments, the interval will include the true parameter value.

Understanding confidence intervals is crucial because:
  • They offer insight into the precision of an estimate.
  • They help interpret the reliability of statistical findings.
  • A wide confidence interval may indicate more data is needed for precise estimates.
Therefore, when analyzing data, it's helpful to look at both p-values and confidence intervals for a comprehensive view of the results.
Proportions in Hypothesis Testing
When we talk about proportions, we're usually comparing the frequency of a specific attribute in a sample to infer something about a larger population. Proportions are everywhere in hypothesis testing scenarios, often requiring hypothesis tests like the z-test or chi-square test for proportions.

In practice, contrasting proportions involves setting up a hypothesis test where:
  • The null hypothesis states no difference exists between proportions.
  • The alternative hypothesis suggests a significant difference.
In the problem at hand, while individual tests show divergence between some pairs, it doesn’t ensure transitive significance across all others – meaning each pair must be analyzed directly to determine significance.
Comparing proportions effectively requires careful attention to the context, appropriate test selection, and interpretation of p-values and confidence intervals. This holistic approach guards against incorrect generalizations based only on partial analysis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Classify each as independent or dependent samples. a. Heights of identical twins b. Test scores of the same students in English and psychology c. The effectiveness of two different brands of aspirin on two different groups of people d. Effects of a drug on reaction time of two different groups of people, measured by a before-and-after test e. The effectiveness of two different diets on two different groups of individuals

Home Prices A real estate agent compares the selling prices of randomly selected homes in two municipalities in southwestern Pennsylvania to see if there is a difference. The results of the study are shown. Is there enough evidence to reject the claim that the average cost of a home in both locations is the same? Use \(\alpha=0.01 .\) $$ \begin{array}{cc}{\text { Scott }} & {\text { Ligonier }} \\ \hline \overline{X_{1}=\$ 93,430^{*}} & {\bar{X}_{2}=\$ 98,043^{*}} \\\ {\sigma_{1}=\$ 5602} & {\sigma_{2}=\$ 4731} \\ {n_{1}=35} & {n_{2}=40}\end{array} $$

For Exercises 9 through \(24,\) perform the following steps. Assume that all variables are normally distributed. a. State the hypotheses and identify the claim. b. Find the critical value. c. Compute the test value. d. Make the decision. e. Summarize the results. Use the traditional method of hypothesis testing unless otherwise specified. Winter Temperatures A random sample of daily high temperatures in January and February is listed. At \(\alpha=0.05,\) can it be concluded that there is a difference in variances in high temperature between the two months? $$ \begin{array}{l|ccccccccccc}{\text { Jan. }} & {31} & {31} & {38} & {24} & {24} & {42} & {22} & {43} & {35} & {42} \\ \hline \text { Feb. } & {31} & {29} & {24} & {30} & {28} & {24} & {27} & {34} & {27}\end{array} $$

Show two different ways to state that the means of two populations are equal.

For Exercises 2 through \(12,\) perform each of these steps. Assume that all variables are normally or approximately normally distributed. a. State the hypotheses and identify the claim. b. Find the critical value(s). c. Compute the test value. d. Make the decision. e. Summarize the results. Use the traditional method of hypothesis testing unless otherwise specified. Overweight Dogs A veterinary nutritionist developed a diet for overweight dogs. The total volume of food consumed remains the same, but one-half of the dog food is replaced with a low-calorie "filler" such as canned green beans. Six overweight dogs were randomly selected from her practice and were put on this program. Their initial weights were recorded, and they were weighed again after 4 weeks. At the 0.05 level of significance, can it be concluded that the dogs lost weight? $$ \begin{array}{l|cccccc}{\text { Before }} & {42} & {53} & {48} & {65} & {40} & {52} \\ \hline \text { After } & {39} & {45} & {40} & {58} & {42} & {47}\end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free