Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The average sales price of new one-family houses in the Midwest is \(\$ 250,000\) and in the South is \(\$ 253,400\). A random sample of 40 houses in each region was examined with the following results. At the 0.05 level of significance, can it be concluded that the difference in mean sales price for the two regions is greater than \(\$ 3400 ?\) $$ \begin{array}{lll} & \text { South } & \text { Midwest } \\ \hline \text { Sample size } & 40 & 40 \\ \text { Sample mean } & \$ 261,500 & \$ 248,200 \\ \text { Population standard deviation } & \$ 10.500 & \$ 12.000 \end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, the difference in mean sales price is greater than $3,400 with a significant Z-score of 5.96.

Step by step solution

01

Define the null and alternative hypotheses

We need to test if the difference in mean sales price between the South and Midwest is greater than $3,400. The null hypothesis \( H_0 \) states that the mean difference \( \mu_S - \mu_M \leq 3,400 \), where \( \mu_S \) and \( \mu_M \) are the population means for South and Midwest respectively. The alternative hypothesis \( H_a \) states that \( \mu_S - \mu_M > 3,400 \).
02

Determine the appropriate test statistic

Since the population standard deviations are known, we use the Z-test for the difference between two means. The formula for the Z-test statistic is \[ Z = \frac{(\bar{X}_S - \bar{X}_M) - 3400}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma_S^2}{n} + \frac{\sigma_M^2}{n}}} \] where \( \bar{X}_S = 261,500 \), \( \bar{X}_M = 248,200 \), \( \sigma_S = 10,500 \), \( \sigma_M = 12,000 \), and \( n = 40 \).
03

Calculate the Z-score

Substitute the values into the formula: \[ Z = \frac{(261,500 - 248,200) - 3400}{\sqrt{\frac{10,500^2}{40} + \frac{12,000^2}{40}}} \] \[ Z = \frac{13,300 - 3,400}{\sqrt{2,756,250}} \approx \frac{9,900}{1,660} \approx 5.96 \]
04

Determine the critical value and decision rule

The significance level is 0.05 for a one-tailed test. Looking at standard Z-tables, the critical value for \( \alpha = 0.05 \) is 1.645. We reject \( H_0 \) if \( Z > 1.645 \).
05

Make a decision

Since the calculated Z-score \( 5.96 \) is greater than the critical value \( 1.645 \), we reject the null hypothesis \( H_0 \). This suggests that the difference in mean sales price is indeed greater than $3,400.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Z-test
A Z-test is a statistical method used to determine whether there is a significant difference between sample and population means. In situations where the population standard deviation is known, and the sample size is large (usually greater than 30), a Z-test is typically applied. In the context of this exercise, a Z-test is employed to evaluate the difference in average sales prices between houses in the South and Midwest.

The formula for a Z-test when comparing two means is:
  • \(Z = \frac{(\bar{X}_S - \bar{X}_M) - \text{hypothesized difference}}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma_S^2}{n} + \frac{\sigma_M^2}{n}}}\)
Here, \(\bar{X}_S\) and \(\bar{X}_M\) represent the sample means for the South and Midwest respectively, while \(\sigma_S\) and \(\sigma_M\) are the population standard deviations for these two regions. \(n\) is the sample size, which is equal for both groups in this exercise.

Using this method allows researchers to draw conclusions about whether any observed differences in the data are simply due to random chance or whether they reflect true differences in the populations.
Significance Level
In hypothesis testing, the significance level (denoted as \(\alpha\)) is a threshold that is set by the researcher to determine when to reject a null hypothesis. It represents the probability of mistakenly rejecting a true null hypothesis, which is an error known as a "Type I error."

In this exercise, the significance level is set at 0.05, or 5%. This means that there is a 5% risk of concluding that there is a significant difference in mean sales prices when, in fact, no such difference exists. The choice of significance level depends on the context of the research and the potential consequences of both Type I and Type II errors (the latter being the error of not rejecting a false null hypothesis).

When the significance level is set to 0.05, it means that if the calculated statistic falls into the region that accounts for the top 5% of the distribution (beyond the critical value), the null hypothesis can be rejected with confidence. This choice assures that the researchers are minimizing the chance of making an incorrect inference from the data.
Critical Value
The critical value is a point on the scale of the test statistic beyond which we reject the null hypothesis. It is determined based on the chosen significance level and the nature of the test (one-tailed or two-tailed).

In the provided exercise, the test is one-tailed because the alternative hypothesis is concerned with whether the difference in sales prices exceeds $3,400, specifically in one direction. At a significance level of 0.05, the critical value can be found using Z-tables or standard normal distribution tables. For a one-tailed test, this critical value is 1.645.

Any Z-score that exceeds the critical value indicates a statistically significant result that leads us to reject the null hypothesis. Here, the computed Z-score was significantly higher than the critical value (5.96 vs. 1.645), reinforcing the decision to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, in this scenario, the difference in mean sales prices is greater than the hypothesized value of $3,400.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Perform each of these steps. Assume that all variables are normally or approximately normally distributed a. State the hypotheses and identify the claim. b. Find the critical value(s). c. Compute the test value. d. Make the decision. e. Summarize the results. Use the traditional method of hypothesis testing unless otherwise specified. Obstacle Course Times An obstacle course was set up on a campus, and 8 randomly selected volunteers were given a chance to complete it while they were being timed. They then sampled a new energy drink and were given the opportunity to run the course again. The "before" and "after" times in seconds are shown. Is there sufficient evidence at \(\alpha=0.05\) to conclude that the students did better the second time? Discuss possible reasons for your results. $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrrrr} \text { Student } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 \\ \hline \text { Before } & 67 & 72 & 80 & 70 & 78 & 82 & 69 & 75 \\ \hline \text { After } & 68 & 70 & 76 & 65 & 75 & 78 & 65 & 68 \end{array} $$

Perform the following steps. Assume that all variables are normally distributed. a. State the hypotheses and identify the claim. b. Find the critical value. c. Compute the test value. d. Make the decision. e. Summarize the results. Use the traditional method of hypothesis testing unless otherwise specified. A researcher wishes to see if the variance of the areas in square miles for counties in Indiana is less than the variance of the areas for counties in Iowa. A random sample of counties is selected, and the data are shown. At \(\alpha=0.01,\) can it be concluded that the variance of the areas for counties in Indiana is less than the variance of the areas for counties in Iowa? $$ \begin{array}{llll|llll} &&&{\text { Indiana }} &{\text { Iowa }} \\ \hline 406 & 393 & 396 & 485 & 640 & 580 & 431 & 416 \\ 431 & 430 & 369 & 408 & 443 & 569 & 779 & 381 \\ 305 & 215 & 489 & 293 & 717 & 568 & 714 & 731 \\ 373 & 148 & 306 & 509 & 571 & 577 & 503 & 501 \\ 560 & 384 & 320 & 407 & 568 & 434 & 615 & 402 \end{array} $$

Perform each of the following steps. a. State the hypotheses and identify the claim. b. Find the critical value(s). c. Compute the test value. d. Make the decision. e. Summarize the results. Use the traditional method of hypothesis testing unless otherwise specified. The average monthly Social Security benefit for a specific year for retired workers was \(\$ 954.90\) and for disabled workers was \(\$ 894.10 .\) Researchers used data from the Social Security records to test the claim that the difference in monthly benefits between the two groups was greater than \(\$ 30 .\) Based on the following information, can the researchers' claim be supported at the 0.05 level of significance? $$ \begin{array}{lll} & \text { Retired } & \text { Disabled } \\ \hline \text { Sample size } & 60 & 60 \\ \text { Mean benefit } & \$ 960.50 & \$ 902.89 \\ \text { Population standard deviation } & \$ 98 & \$ 101 \end{array} $$

Perform the following steps. Assume that all variables are normally distributed. a. State the hypotheses and identify the claim. b. Find the critical value. c. Compute the test value. d. Make the decision. e. Summarize the results. Use the traditional method of hypothesis testing unless otherwise specified. An instructor who taught an online statistics course and a classroom course feels that the variance of the final exam scores for the students who took the online course is greater than the variance of the final exam scores of the students who took the classroom final exam. The following data were obtained. At \(\alpha=0.05\) is there enough evidence to support the claim? $$ \begin{array}{cc} \text { Online Course } & \text { Classroom Course } \\ \hline s_{1}=3.2 & s_{2}=2.8 \\ n_{1}=11 & n_{2}=16 \end{array} $$

Perform each of these steps. Assume that all variables are normally or approximately normally distributed a. State the hypotheses and identify the claim. b. Find the critical value(s). c. Compute the test value. d. Make the decision. e. Summarize the results. Use the traditional method of hypothesis testing unless otherwise specified. Mistakes in a Song A random sample of six music students played a short song, and the number of mistakes in music each student made was recorded. After they practiced the song 5 times, the number of mistakes each student made was recorded. The data are shown. At \(\alpha=0.05,\) can it be concluded that there was a decrease in the mean number of mistakes? $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrr} \text { Student } & \text { A } & \text { B } & \text { C } & \text { D } & \text { E } & \text { F } \\ \hline \text { Before } & 10 & 6 & 8 & 8 & 13 & 8 \\ \hline \text { After } & 4 & 2 & 2 & 7 & 8 & 9 \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free