Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Rank each set of data. $$ 11.7,18.6,41.7,11.7,16.2,5.1,31.4,5.1,14.3 $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
5.1 = 1.5, 11.7 = 3.5, 14.3 = 5, 16.2 = 6, 18.6 = 7, 31.4 = 8, 41.7 = 9.

Step by step solution

01

List and Identify the Data

Start by noting down the given set of numbers: 11.7, 18.6, 41.7, 11.7, 16.2, 5.1, 31.4, 5.1, 14.3. Make sure you identify any repeating values, as ties need special consideration when ranking.
02

Order the Data in Ascending Order

Arrange the numbers from the smallest to the largest value: 5.1, 5.1, 11.7, 11.7, 14.3, 16.2, 18.6, 31.4, 41.7.
03

Assign Ranks to Ordered Data

Assign ranks starting from 1 for the lowest number. Since 5.1 repeats, assign both as rank 1.5 (the average of ranks 1 and 2). Similarly, both 11.7s receive rank 3.5 (the average of ranks 3 and 4). Continue assigning ranks to the rest of the numbers: 14.3 as 5, 16.2 as 6, 18.6 as 7, 31.4 as 8, and 41.7 as 9.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Ascending Order
To rank data effectively, the first step is organizing the values in ascending order. Simply put, this means arranging the numbers from smallest to largest.

For instance, if we have the numbers 11.7, 5.1, and 18.6, sorting them in ascending order would result in 5.1, 11.7, and 18.6.

Why is ascending order important? This arrangement helps us compare and rank the values more intuitively, as you're working from the lowest to the highest. Remembering this straightforward procedure is crucial for any ranking process.
Handling Ties in Ranking
Sometimes, in a list of numbers, certain values can repeat—these are called ties. When ranking data, ties require special attention to ensure fairness and accuracy.

Here's how you handle ties:
  • Identify the repeated values.
  • Instead of assigning them consecutive ranks, calculate the average of those ranks and assign the average rank to all tied values.
For example, if the values 11.7 and 11.7 appear in positions 3 and 4, find the average: \[ \frac{3 + 4}{2} = 3.5 \]In this way, both instances of 11.7 receive a rank of 3.5. Handling ties in this manner ensures that the ranking system reflects the actual data accurately and equitably.
Assigning Ranks
Once your data is organized in ascending order and you've resolved any ties, you're ready to assign ranks to each value.

This process begins with ranking the smallest value as 1. Simply continue assigning increasing ranks for each subsequent number.

When you encounter tied values, use the average rank as discussed. Consider the following sequence:
  • 5.1, 5.1 (both receive rank 1.5)
  • 11.7, 11.7 (both receive rank 3.5)
  • 14.3 receives 5
  • 16.2 as 6, 18.6 as 7, and so on
Assigning ranks like this ensures clarity and precision, helping make data analysis straightforward and meaningful.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Use the Kruskal-Wallis test and perform these steps. a. State the hypotheses and identify the claim. b. Find the critical value. c. Compute the test value. d. Make the decision. e. Summarize the results. Use the traditional method of hypothesis testing unless otherwise specified. Amounts of Caffeine in Beverages The amounts of caffeine in randomly selected regular (small) servings of assorted beverages are listed. If someone wants to limit caffeine intake, does it really matter which beverage she or he chooses? Is there a difference in caffeine content at \(\alpha=0.05 ?\) $$ \begin{array}{lrc} \text { Teas } & \text { Coffees } & \text { Colas } \\ \hline 70 & 120 & 35 \\ 40 & 80 & 48 \\ 30 & 160 & 55 \\ 25 & 90 & 43 \\ 40 & 140 & 42 \end{array} $$

Use the Kruskal-Wallis test and perform these steps. a. State the hypotheses and identify the claim. b. Find the critical value. c. Compute the test value. d. Make the decision. e. Summarize the results. Use the traditional method of hypothesis testing unless otherwise specified. Depression Levels A psychologist designed a questionnaire to measure the level of depression among her patients. She divided the patients into three groups: never married, married, and divorced. Then she randomly selected subjects from each group and administered a questionnaire to measure their level of depression. The scale ranges from 0 to \(50 .\) The higher the score, the more severe the patient's depression. The scores are shown. At \(\alpha=0.10\), is there a difference in the means? $$ \begin{array}{ccc} \text { Never married } & \text { Married } & \text { Divorced } \\ \hline 37 & 40 & 38 \\ 39 & 36 & 35 \\ 32 & 32 & 21 \\ 31 & 33 & 19 \\ 37 & 39 & 31 \\ 32 & 33 & 24 \\ & 30 & \end{array} $$

Lengths of Prison Sentences A random sample of men and women in prison was asked to give the length of sentence each received for a certain type of crime. At \(\alpha=0.05,\) test the claim that there is no difference in the sentence received by each gender. The data (in months) are shown here. $$\begin{aligned}&\begin{array}{l|ccccccccc}\text { Males } & 8 & 12 & 6 & 14 & 22 & 27 & 32 & 24 & 26 \\\\\hline \text { Females } & 7 & 5 & 2 & 3 & 21 & 26 & 30 & 9 & 4\end{array}\\\&\begin{array}{l|ccccc}\text { Males } & 19 & 15 & 13 & & \\\\\hline \text { Females } & 17 & 23 & 12 & 11 & 16\end{array}\end{aligned}$$

To test the claim that there is no difference in the lifetimes of two brands of handheld video games, a researcher selects a random sample of 11 video games of each brand. The lifetimes (in months) of each brand are shown. At \(\alpha=0.01\), can the researcher conclude that there is a difference in the distributions of lifetimes for the two brands? $$\begin{array}{l|ccccccccccc}\text { Brand A } & 42 & 34 & 39 & 42 & 22 & 47 & 51 & 34 & 41 & 39 & 28 \\\\\hline \text { Brand B } & 29 & 39 & 38 & 43 & 45 & 49 & 53 & 38 & 44 & 43 & 32\end{array}$$

A game commissioner wishes to see if the number of hunting accidents in counties in western Pennsylvania is different from the number of hunting accidents in counties in eastern Pennsylvania. Random samples of counties from the two regions are selected, and the numbers of hunting accidents are shown. At \(\alpha=0.05,\) is there a difference in the number of accidents in the two areas? If so, give a possible reason for the difference. $$\begin{array}{l|cccccccccc}\text { Western Pa. } & 10 & 21 & 11 & 11 & 9 & 17 & 13 & 8 & 15 & 17 \\\\\hline \text { Eastern Pa. } & 14 & 3 & 7 & 13 & 11 & 2 & 8 & 5 & 5 & 6\end{array}$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free