Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Families in Poverty. In 2012, 15.9%of all U.S. families had incomes below the poverty level, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau in American Community Survey. During that same year, of 400randomly selected Wyoming families, had incomes below the poverty level. At the 5%significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that, in2012, the percentage of families with incomes below the poverty level was lower among those living in Wyoming than among all U.S. families?

Short Answer

Expert verified

At the5% level, the test results are statistically significant.

As a result, no, the data does not provide adequate evidence to conclude that the percentage of families with incomes below the poverty line was lower in Wyoming than in the rest of the United States.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The significance level is 5%

The number of families is n=400

p0=0.159

Income below the poverty level isx=50

02

Explanation

The sample proportion is calculated as

p^=xn

p^=50400

=0.125

Calculate the value of np0

np0=(400)(0.159)

role="math" localid="1651415199813" =63.6

Calculate the value of

n1-p0=(400)(1-0.159)

=336.4

Both the values are greater than 5.

So one proportion z-test is appropriate to use.

The null hypothesis is

H0:p0=0.159

The alternate hypothesis is

H0:p0<0.159

The expression for zis

z=p^-p0P01-p0n

The zvalue is calculated as

z=0.125-0.1590.159(1-0.159)400

=-0.0340.0183

=-1.86

When α=0.05the tail is left tailed

The critical value of zfrom the standard table is

z0.05=-1.645

The test statistic is in the negative range. As a result, the hypothesis H0is ruled out.

At the5% level, the test results are statistically significant.

As a result, no, the data does not provide adequate evidence to conclude that the percentage of families with incomes below the poverty line was lower in Wyoming than in the rest of the United States.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain the relationships among the sample proportion, the number of successes in the sample, and the sample size.

Racial Crossover. In the paper "The Racial Crossover in Comorbidity, Disability, and Mortality" (Demography, Vol. 37(3), pp. 267-283), N. Johnson investigated the health of independent random samples of white and African-American elderly (aged 70 years or older). Of the 4989 white elderly surveyed, 529 had at least one stroke, whereas 103 of the 906 African-American elderly surveyed - Lported at least one stroke. At the 5%significance level, do the data suggest that there is a difference in stroke incidence between white and African-American elderly?

A Wall Street Journal article, titled "Hypertension Drug Linked to Cancer," reported on a study of several types of high-blood-pressure drugs and links to cancer. For one type, called calcium-channel blockers, 27of 202elderly patients taking the drug developed cancer. For another type, called beta-blockers, 28of 424other elderly patients developed cancer. Find a 90%confidence interval for the difference between the cancer rates of elderly people taking calcium-channel blockers and those taking beta-blockers. Note: The results of this study were challenged and questioned by several sources that claimed, for example, that the study was flawed and that several other studies have suggested that calcium-channel blockers are safe.

Suppose that you can make reasonably good educated guesses, p^1gand p^2g, for the observed values of p^1and p^2.

a. Use your result from Exercise 11.132to show that a (1-α)-level confidence interval for the difference between two population proportions that has an approximate margin of error of Ecan be obtained by choosing

n1=n2=p^1g1-p^1g+p^2g1-p^2gza/2E2

rounded up to the nearest whole number. Note: If you know likely ranges instead of exact educated guesses for the observed values of the two sample proportions, use the values in the ranges closest to 0.5as the educated guesses.

b. Explain why the formula in part (a) yields smaller (or at worst the same) sample sizes than the formula in Exercise 11.133.

c. When reasonably good educated guesses for the observed values of p^1and p^2can be made, explain why choosing the sample sizes by using the formula in part (a) is preferable to choosing them by using the formula in Exercise 11.133.

Folic Acid and Birth Defects. For several years, evidence had been mounting that folic acid reduces major birth defects. A. Creizel and I. Dudas of the National Institute of Hygiene in Budapest directed a study that provided the strongest evidence to date. Their results were published in the paper "Prevention of the First Occurrence of Neural-Tube Defects by Periconceptional Vitamin Supplementation" (New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 327(26). p. 1832 ). For the study, the doctors enrolled women prior to conception and divided them randomly into two groups. One group, consisting of 2701 women, took daily multivitamins containing 0.8mg of folic acid; the other group, consisting of 2052 women, received nay A. Creizel and L. Duxlas of the National Institute of Hygiene i) Budapest directed a study that provided the strongest evidence to date Their results were published in the paper "Prevention of the Firs Occurrence of Neural-Tube Defects by Periconceptional Vitamin Supplementation" (New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 327(26). p. 1832 ). For the study, the doctors enrolled women prior to conception and divided them randomly into two groups. One group, consisting of 2701 women, took daily multivitamins containing 0.8mg of folic acid; the other group. consisting of 2052 women, received only trace elements. Major birth defects occurred in 35 cases when the women took folic acid and in 47 cases when the women did not.

a. At the 1%significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that women who take folic acid are at lesser risk of having children with major birth defects?

b. Is this study a designed experiment or an observational study? Explain your answer.

c. In view of your answers to parts (a) and (b), could you reasonably conclude that taking folic acid causes a reduction in major birth defects? Explain your answer.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free