Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider the variables "class level" and "college".

Part (a): Group the bivariate data for these two variables into a contingency table.

Part (b): Determine the conditional distribution of gender within each class level and the marginal distribution of gender.

Part (c): Determine the conditional distribution of class level within each gender and the marginal distribution of class level.

Part (d): Does an association exist between the variables "class level" and "college" for this population? Explain your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part (a): The contingency table is given below,

Part (b): The required distribution is given below,

Part (c): The required distribution is given below,

Part (d): Yes. The conditional distributions of one variable given the other variable are not identical.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1. Given information,

Consider the given question,

02

Part (a) Step 2. Write the contingency table. 

On grouping the bivariate data for the two variables "class level" and "college" into a contingency table is given below,

03

Part (b) Step 1. Determine the conditional distribution of gender.

The table given below is of required conditional and marginal distribution,

04

Part (c) Step 1. Determine the conditional distribution of class level.

The table given below is of required conditional and marginal distribution,

05

Part (d) Step 1. Explain if an association exist.

Yes, an association exist between the variables "class level" and "college" for this population.

The conditional distributions of one variable given the other variable are not identical.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

12.51 Farms. The U.S. Department of Agriculture publishes information about U.S. farms in Census of Agriculture. A joint frequency distribution for number of farms, by acreage and tenure of operator, is provided in the following contingency table. Frequencies are in


Full ownerPart ownerTenantTotal
Under 50
7044
50-17949213038660
180-499198

368
500-999518414149
1000& over4111417172
Total1521541

a. Fill in the six missing entries.

b. How many cells does this contingency table have?

c. How many farms have under 50 acres?

d. How many farms are tenant operated?

e. How many farms are operated by part owners and have between 500 acres and 999 acres, inclusive?

f. How many farms are not full-owner operated?

g. How many tenant-operated farms have 180 acres or more?

A chi-square homogeneity test is to be conducted to decide whether a difference exists among the distributions of a variable of six populations. The variable has five possible values. What are the degrees of freedom for the x2-statistic?

We stated earlier that, if two variables are not associated, ther eis no point in looking for a casual relationship. Why is that so?

In given exercise use either the critical-value approach or the P-value approach to perform a chi square independence lest. provided the conditions for using the test are met.

Siskel In the classic TV show Sneak Previews, originally hosted by the late Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert, the two Chicago movie critics reviewed the weeks new movie releases and

then rated them thumbs up (positive), mixed, thumbs down (negative). These two critics often saw the merits of a movie differently. In general, however, were ratings given by Siskel and Ebert

associated? The answer to this question was the focus of the paper "Evaluating Agreement and Disagreement Among Movie Reviewers" by A. Agresti and L. Winner that appeared in Chance

(Vol- 10(2), pp-10-14). The following contingency table summarizes ratings by Siskel and Ebert for 160 movies.

At the 1% significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that an association exists between ratings of Siskel and Ebert?

In each of Exercises 12.11-12.16, we have given the relative frequencies for the null hypothesis of a chi-square goodness-of-fir text and the sample size. In each case, decide whether Assumptions 1 and 2 for using that text are satisfied.

Sample size : n= 100.

Relative frequencies: 0.44 , 0.25 , 0.30 , 0.01.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free