Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Road Rage. The report Controlling Road Rage: A Literature Review and Pilot Study was prepared for the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety by D. Rathbone and. Huckabee. The authors discussed the results of a literature review and pilot study on how to prevent aggressive driving and road rage. Road rage is defined as an incident in which an angry or impatient motorist or passenger intentionally injures or kills another motorist, passenger, or pedestrian, or attempts or threatens to injure or kill another motorist, passenger, or pedestrian." One aspect of the study was to investigate road rage as a function of the day of the week. The following table provides a frequency distribution for the days on which 69 road-rage incidents occurred.

Day

Frequency

Sunday

5

Monday

5

Tuesday

11

Wednesday

12

Thursday

11

Friday

18

Saturday

7

At the significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that road-rage incidents are more likely to occur on some days than on others?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Ans: we reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, there is enough evidence to support the claim that road-rage incidents are more likely to occur on some days than on others.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Given information.

given,

Day

Frequency

Sunday

5

Monday

5

Tuesday

11

Wednesday

12

Thursday

11

Friday

18

Saturday

7

02

Step 2. It is said that incidents of street violence are more likely to occur on some days than others. Below the claim are some common misconceptions:

Step 1-

H0: Road accidents are likely to occur someday.

H1: Road accidents are more common on some days than on others.

Step 2-

We performed the test at a 5%significance level, so α=0.05

Step 3-

To test the null hypothesis we have the test statistics as follows,
χ2=(OE)2E

Where Ois the observed and Eis to expected frequencies.

For the expected (E) frequencies we have,

E=npp=17(number of days7)n=O=69

So, the expected frequency for each observed frequency is 9.86.

03

Step 3. By using the above values test statistics value are as follows,

O

E

(O-E)2

(O-E)2E

5

9.86

23.6196

2.3955

5

9.86

23.6196

2.3955

11

9.86

1.2996

0.13181

12

9.86

4.5796

0.46446

11

9.86

1.2996

0.13181

18

9.86

66.2596

6.72004

7

9.86

8.1796

0.82957




13.0687

χ2=(OE)2E=13.069

04

Step 4. 

05

Step 5. Now,

Step 5:

The calculated test statistic value x2=13.069is greater than the critical value x20.05=12.592,

so we reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, there is enough evidence to support the claim that road-rage incidents are more likely to occur on some days than on others.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In each of Exercises 12.11-12.16, we have given the relative frequencies for the null hypothesis of a chi-square goodness-of-fir text and the sample size. In each case, decide whether Assumptions 1 and 2 for using that text are satisfied.

Sample size : n= 100.

Relative frequencies: 0.44 , 0.25 , 0.30 , 0.01.

Presidential Election. According to Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections, in the 2012 presidential election, 51.01%of those voting voted for the Democratic candidate (Barack H. Obama), whereas 57.50%of those voting who lived in Illinois did so. For that presidential election, does an association exist between the variables "party of presidential candidate voted for" and "state of residence" for those who voted? Explain your answer.

The t-table has entries for areas of 0.10,0.05,0.025,0.01and0.005. In contrast, the χ2-table has entries for those areas and for 0.995,0.99,0.975,0.95and 0.90.Explain why the t-values corresponding to these additional areas can be obtained from the existing t-table but must be provided explicitly in the χ2-table.

In each of the given Exercises, we have presented a contingency table that gives a cross-classification of a random sample of values for two variables, x, and y, of a population. For each exercise, perform the following tasks.

a. Find the expected frequencies. Note: You will first need to compute the row totals, column totals, and grand total.

b. Determine the value of the chi-square statistic.

c. Decide at the 5% significance level whether the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the two variables are associated.

Job Satisfaction. A CNN/USA TODAY poll conducted by Gallul asked a sample of employed Americans the following question: "Which do you enjoy more, the hours when you are on your job, or the hours when you are not on your job?" The responses to this question were cross-tabulated against several characteristics, among which were gender, age, type of community, educational attainment, income, and type of employer. The data are provided on the WeissStats site. In each of Exercises 12.87-12.92, use the technology of your choice to decide, at the 5% significance level, whether an association exists between the specified pair of variables.

type of employer and response

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free