Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Breast Milk and IQ. Considerable controversy exists over whether long-term neurodevelopment is affected by nutritional factors in early life. A. Lucas and R. Morley summarized their findings on that question for preterm babies in the publication "Breast Milk and Subsequent Intelligence Quotient in Children Born Preterm (The Lancet, Vol. 339, Issue 8788, Pp, 261-264). The researchers analyzed IQ data on children at age 712-8years. The mothers of the children in the study had chosen whether to provide their infants with breast milk within 72hours of delivery. The researchers used the following designations. Group I: mothers declined to provide breast milk; Group ll a: mothers had chosen but were unable to provide breast milk and Group Il b; mothers had chosen and were able to provide breast milk. Here are the summary statistics on IQ.

At the 1%significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that a difference exists in mean IQ at age 712-8years for preterm children among the three groups? Note: For the degrees of freedom in this exercise:

Short Answer

Expert verified

The data shows that there is a difference in mean IQ at age years for preterm children in each of the three groups.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The given data is

02

Explanation

The level of significance is α=0.01

Let us do the test hypotheses

Null hypotheses

H0: There is no difference exist in mean IQ at age years for preterm children among the three groups.

Alternative hypothesis

Ha: There is a difference exist in mean IQ at age years for preterm children among the three groups.

The mean of the observation is

x¯=90(92.8)+17(94.8)+193(103.7)90+17+193

=29977.7300

=99.926

The treatment sum of squares is

SSTR=nix¯i-x¯2

=90(92.8-99.926)2+17(92.8-99.926)2+193(92.8-99.926)2

=7765.792

The error sum of squares is

SSE=ni-1si2

=(90-1)(15.2)2+(17-1)(19.0)2+(193-1)(15.3)2

=71283.840

Then the sum of squares is

SST=SSTR+SSE

=7765.792+71283.84

=79049.63

The mean treatment of the sum of squares is

MSTR=SSTRk-1

localid="1652201913362" =7765.7922

=3882.896

Then, the mean error of the sum of squares is

MSE=SSEn-k

=71283.840273

=240.013

The F-static is

F-static=MSTRMSE

=3882.896240.013

=16.178

Then, α=0.01

Critical value is 4.68

F-static (16.178)>critical value (4.68)

As a result, the crucial value approach

At a 1%significant threshold, the null hypothesis is rejected.

As a result, the results are statistically significant at the 1%level.

As a result, the results show that there is a difference in mean IQ at age years for preterm children in each of the three groups.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the following hypothetical samples

a. Obtain the sample mean and sample variance of each of the three samples.

b. Obtain SST, SSTR and SSE by using the defining formulas and verify that the one-way ANOVA identity holds.

c. Obtain SST, SSTR and SSE by using the computing formulas.

d. Construct the one-way ANOVA table.

Losses to Robbery. At the 5%significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that a difference in mean losses exists among the three types of robberies? Use one-way ANOVA to perform the required hypothesis test. (Note: T1=4899,T2=7013,T3=4567and 5x2=16,683,857.)

Sample 1 Sample 2
Sample 3 Sample 4
6948
3544
3726

82

63

Movie fans use the annual Leonard Maltin Movie Guide for facts, cast members, and reviews of more than 21000films. The movies are rated from 4stars (4*), indicating a very good movie, to 1 star (1*), which Leonard Maltin refers to as a BOMB. The following table gives the running times, in minutes, of a random sample of films listed in one year's guide.

At the 1%significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that a difference exists in mean running times among films in the four rating groups? (Note:T1=483,T2=573,T3=576,T4=691,Σx12=232.117.)

a. Obtain individual normal probability plots and the standard deviations of the samples.

b. Perform a residual analysis.

c. Use your results from parts (a) and (b) to decide whether conducting a one-way ANOVA test and the data is reasonable. If so, also do parts (d)-(e).

d. Use a one-way ANOVA test to decide, at the 5%significance level, whether the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that a difference exists among the means of the populations from which the samples were taken.

e. Interpret your results from part (d).

Weight loss and Leg Power. Another characteristic compared in the hip bone density study "discussed in Problem 19
was " Maximum Nottingham leg power, in watts, On the WeissStats site, we provide the leg-power data for the three groups, based on the results obtained by the researchers.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free