Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Using Nonparametric Tests. In Exercises 1–10, use a 0.05 significance level with the indicated test. If no particular test is specified, use the appropriate nonparametric test from this chapter.

Airline Fares Listed below are the costs (in dollars) of eight different flights from New York (JFK) to San Francisco for Virgin America, US Airways, United Airlines, JetBlue, Delta, American Airlines, Alaska Airlines, and Sun Country Airlines. (Each pair of costs is for the same flight.) Use the sign test to test the claim that there is no difference in cost between flights scheduled 1 day in advance and those scheduled 30 days in advance. What appears to be a wise scheduling strategy?

Flight scheduled one day in advance

584

490

584

584

584

606

628

717

Flight scheduled 30 days in advance

254

308

244

229

284

509

394

258

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is enough evidence to reject the claim that there is no difference in the costs of flights between those scheduled one day in advance and those scheduled 30 days in advance.

A wise scheduling strategy would be to buy the flight tickets 30 days in advance.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Two samples show the airfares of eight different flights from New York to San Francisco.

02

Identify the hypothesis of the test

The sign test examinesthe claim that there is no difference in the cost between flights scheduled oneday prior and flights scheduled 30 days before.

The null hypothesis is as follows:

There is no difference in the cost between flights scheduled oneday in advance and those scheduled 30 days in advance.

The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

There is no difference in the cost between flights scheduled oneday in advance and those scheduled 30 days in advance.

03

Assign the sign of difference

Assign a negative sign to the difference if the cost corresponding to sample 1 (flights scheduled oneday in advance) is less than the cost corresponding to sample 2 (flights scheduled 30 days in advance).

Assign a positive sign to the difference if the cost corresponding to sample 1 (flights scheduled one day in advance) is greater than the cost corresponding to sample 2 (flights scheduled 30 days in advance).

The following table shows the sign of differences:

Flight scheduled one day in advance

584

490

584

584

584

606

628

717

Flight scheduled 30 days in advance

254

308

244

229

284

509

394

258

Sign of Difference

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

04

Calculate the test statistic

The total number of observations (n) is 8.

Since \(n \le 25\), the value of the test statistic (x) needs to be determined.

The number of times the positive sign occurs is 8.

The number of times the negative sign occurs is 0.

Here, the less frequent sign is the negative sign.

Thus, the test statistic (x) is the number of times the less frequent sign occurs, which is equal to 0.

05

Determine the conclusion of the test

The critical value of x for n=8 and \(\alpha = 0.05\) for a two-tailed test is 0.

Since the value of the test statistic is equal to the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to reject the claim that there is nodifference in the costs of flights between those scheduled one day in advance and those scheduled 30 days in advance.

06

Appropriate scheduling strategy

As all of the eight air fares are higher for a flight scheduled oneday in advance than the flights scheduled 30 days in advance, it would be wise to schedule the flight 30 days in advance to save the extra cost.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Cell Phones and Crashes: Analyzing Newspaper Report In an article from the Associated Press, it was reported that researchers “randomly selected 100 New York motorists who had been in an accident and 100 who had not been in an accident. Of those in accidents, 13.7 percent owned a cellular phone, while just 10.6 percent of the accident-free drivers had a phone in the car.” What is wrong with these results?

Using Nonparametric Tests. In Exercises 1–10, use a 0.05 significance level with the indicated test. If no particular test is specified, use the appropriate nonparametric test from this chapter.

Speed Dating In a study of speed dating conducted at Columbia University, female subjects were asked to rate the attractiveness of their male dates, and a sample of the results is listed below (1 = not attractive; 10 = extremely attractive). Use the sign test to test the claim that the sample is from a population with a median equal to 5.

5

8

3

8

6

10

3

7

9

8

5

5

6

8

8

7

3

5

5

6

8

7

8

8

8

7





Matched Pairs.In Exercises 5–8, use the sign test for the data consisting of matched pairs.

Speed Dating: Attributes Listed below are “attribute” ratings made by couples participating in a speed dating session. Each attribute rating is the sum of the ratings of five attributes (sincerity, intelligence, fun, ambition, shared interests). The listed ratings are from Data Set 18 “Speed Dating” in Appendix B. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that there is a difference between female attribute ratings and male attribute ratings.

Rating of Male by Female

29

38

36

37

30

34

35

23

43

Rating of Female by Male

36

34

34

33

31

17

31

30

42

Efficiency of the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test Refer to Table 13-2 on page 600 and identify the efficiency of the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. What does that value tell us about the test?

Efficiency Refer to Table 13-2 on page 600 and identify the efficiency of the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. What does that value tell us about the test?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free