Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

For Chapter 2 through Chapter 14, the Cumulative Review Exercises include topics from preceding chapters. For this chapter, we present a few calculator warm-up exercises, with expressions similar to those found throughout this book. Use your calculator to find the indicated values.

Tallest Person Robert Wadlow (1918–1940) is the tallest known person to have lived. The expression below converts his height of 272 cm to a standardized score. Find this value and round the result to two decimal places. Such standardized scores are considered to be significantly high if they are greater than 2 or 3. Is the result significantly high?

\(\frac{{272 - 176}}{6}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified

The standardized score of Robert Wadlow’s height, given as 272 cm, is equal to 16.00.

The value is significantly high as it is much greater than 2 and 3.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The height of the tallest person, Robert Wadlow, is equal to 272 cm.

The standardized score of his height is given by \(\frac{{272 - 176}}{6}\).

02

Determining the standardized score

Here, the value of his height is given to be272 cm.

The standardized score is calculated from the given expression \(\frac{{272 - 176}}{6}\)as shown below:

\(\begin{array}{c}\frac{{272 - 176}}{6} = \frac{{96}}{6}\\ = 16\end{array}\)

Thus, the standardized score is 16.00.

03

Checking for significance

Since the standardized score is above the given threshold value (2 or 3), it can be concluded that the standardized score of Robert Wadlow’s height is significantly high.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Online Medical Info. USA Today posted this question on its website: “How often do you seek medical information online?” Of 1072 Internet users who chose to respond, 38% of them responded with “frequently.” What term is used to describe this type of survey in which the people surveyed consist of those who decided to respond? What is wrong with this type of sampling method?

Determine whether the sampling method appears to be sound or is flawed.

Nuclear Power Plants. In a survey of 1368 subjects, the following question was posted on the USA Today website: “In your view, are nuclear plants safe?” The survey subjects were Internet users who chose to respond to the question posted on the electronic edition of USA Today.

In Exercises 17–20, refer to the sample of body temperatures (degrees Fahrenheit) in the table below. (The body temperatures are from a data set in Appendix B.)


12345
8 AM9798.597.697.798.7
12 AM97.697.89898.498.4

Conclusion Given the body temperatures in the table, what issue can be addressed by conducting a statistical analysis of the data.

In Exercises 21–24, refer to the data in the table below. The entries are white blood cell counts (1000 cells,ML) and red blood cell counts (million cells,ML) from male subjects examined as part of a large health study conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics. The data are matched, so that the first subject has a white blood cell count of 8.7 and a red blood cell count of 4.91, and so on.

Subject


12345
White8.75.97.36.25.9
Red4.915.594.444.85.17

Context Given that the data are matched and considering the units of the data, does it make sense to use the difference between each white blood cell count and the corresponding red blood cell count? Why or why not?

In Exercises 17–20, refer to the sample of body temperatures (degrees Fahrenheit) in the table below. (The body temperatures are from a data set in Appendix B.).

Conclusion If we analyze the listed body temperatures with suitable methods of statistics, we conclude that when the differences are found between the 8 AM body temperatures and the 12 AM body temperatures, there is a 64% chance that the differences can be explained by random results obtained from populations that have the same 8 AM and 12 AM body temperatures. What should we conclude about the statistical significance of those differences?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free