Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Question: Statistical Significance versus Practical Significance. When testing a new treatment, what is the difference between statistical significance and practical significance? Can a treatment have statistical significance but not practical significance?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The distinction between statistical and practical significance is as follows:

  • Statistical significance denotes that the test result is unlikely to arise.
  • Practical significance shows whether or not the treatment suggests enough difference between the sample and parameter (or hypothetical value).

Yes, a treatment that is not practically significant can have statistical significance.

Step by step solution

01

Compare the statistical significance and practical significance of a new treatment.

Statistical significances are results of statistical tests, termed hypothesis tests. They conclude results based on sample statistics like sample size and other estimates. A statistically significant result implies that the new treatment shows a change or difference from the null assumption.

The result is obtained when a rare sample value is acquired, assuming the null assumption is correct.

Practical significance, on the other hand, is measured using the effect sizes of the hypothesis tests. It indicates whether the statistical conclusion holds some practical importance, whether meaningful for common use or not.

Thus, statistical significance decides if the sample results apply to the entire population, while practical significance decides if the results are practical enough to be mapped onto the population for common use.

02

Explain if a treatment can have statistical significance but no practical significance.

Yes, a new treatment being tested may have statistical significance and yet no practical significance.

This situation can occur in the following scenarios:

  • The sample size is too large, which leads to statistical significance, but it is of no practical use.
  • The samples are collected in a way that the dispersion of observation is too small, which can also lead to a statistically significant result that may not be used for a common purpose in the population

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercises 21โ€“24, refer to the data in the table below. The entries are white blood cell counts (1000 cells,ML) and red blood cell counts (million cells,ML) from male subjects examined as part of a large health study conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics. The data are matched, so that the first subject has a white blood cell count of 8.7 and a red blood cell count of 4.91, and so on.

Source of the Data Considering the source of the data, does that source appear to be biased in some way?

In Exercises 21โ€“24, refer to the data in the table below. The entries are white blood cell counts (1000 cells,ML) and red blood cell counts (million cells,ML) from male subjects examined as part of a large health study conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics. The data are matched, so that the first subject has a white blood cell count of 8.7 and a red blood cell count of 4.91, and so on.

Subject


12345
White8.75.97.36.25.9
Red4.915.594.444.85.17

Given the context of the data in the table, what issue can be addressed by conducting a statistical analysis of the measurements?

Statistical Significance and Practical Significance. In Exercises 13โ€“16, determine whether the results appear to have statistical significance, and also determine whether the results appear to have practical significance.

IQ Scores Most people have IQ scores between 70 and 130. For $39.99, you can purchase a PC or Mac program from HighIQPro that is claimed to increase your IQ score by 10 to 20 points. The program claims to be โ€œthe only proven IQ increasing software in the brain training market,โ€ but the author of your text could find no data supporting that claim, so letโ€™s suppose that these results were obtained: In a study of 12 subjects using the program, the average increase in IQ score is 3 IQ points. There is a 25% chance of getting such results if the program has no effect.

In Exercises 21โ€“24, refer to the data in the table below. The entries are white blood cell counts (1000 cells,ML) and red blood cell counts (million cells,ML) from male subjects examined as part of a large health study conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics. The data are matched, so that the first subject has a white blood cell count of 8.7 and a red blood cell count of 4.91, and so on.

Given the context of the data in the table, what issue can be addressed by conducting a statistical analysis of the measurements?

Determine whether the data are from discrete data or continuous data set.

Corvettes A shift manager records the numbers of Corvettes manufactured during each day of production.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free