Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Reported versus Measured. In a survey of 1046 adults conducted by Bradley Corporation, subjects were asked how often they wash their hands when using a public restroom, and 70% of the respondents said “always.”

a. Identify the sample and the population.

b. Why would better results be obtained by observing hand washing instead of asking about it?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The population comprises people who are adults and use public restrooms and the sample includes 1046 such adults.
  1. Observation provides unbiased responses.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Out of 1046 sampled adults, 70% responded that they always wash their hands after using the public restroom.

02

Define the sample and population of the study

  1. A population is formed of all the items in the data set that are required to be studied. A conclusion is stated for all of these items.
  2. A portion of such a population taken for responses is regarded as a sample.
03

Identify sample and population

In this case, the population consists of all the adults who use public restrooms. They have been targeted for the study.

The sample is a portion of this population that responded to the question, which includes 1046 adults.

Thus,

  • Population: All adults who use a public washroom.
  • Sample: 1046 adults who responded to the survey.
04

Explain why the responses gathered through observation are better than asking

  1. When responses are gathered from observation, the samples have a higher chance of being unbiased. On the other hand, when responses are obtained on asking a question, there are higher chances that the respondents can lie or give misleading answers that can change the reliability of the results.

Thus, responses gathered by observing adults for handwashing will provide better and more reliable results than asking about it.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercises 29–36, answer the given questions, which are related to percentages.

Percentages in Negotiations When the author was negotiating a contract for the faculty and administration at a college, a dean presented the argument that if faculty receive a 4% raise and administrators receive a 4% raise, that’s an 8% raise and it would never be approved. What’s wrong with that argument?

Question: Statistical Significance versus Practical Significance. When testing a new treatment, what is the difference between statistical significance and practical significance? Can a treatment have statistical significance but not practical significance?

In Exercises 29–36, answer the given questions, which are related to percentages.

Chillax USA Today reported results from a Research Now for Keurig survey in which 1458 men and 1543 women were asked this: “In a typical week, how often can you kick back and relax?”

a. Among the women, 19% responded with “rarely, if ever.” What is the exact value that is 19% of the number of women surveyed?

b. Could the result from part (a) be the actual number of women who responded with “rarely, if ever”? Why or why not?

c. What is the actual number of women who responded with “rarely, if ever”?

d. Among the men who responded, 219 responded with “rarely, if ever.” What is the percentage of men who responded with “rarely, if ever.”?

e. Consider the question that the subjects were asked. Is that question clear and unambiguous so that all respondents will interpret the question the same way? How might the survey be improved?

What’s Wrong with This Picture? The Newport Chronicle ran a survey by asking readers to call in their response to this question: “Do you support the development of atomic weapons that could kill millions of innocent people?” It was reported that 20 readers responded and that 87% said “no,” while 13% said “yes.” Identify four major flaws in this survey.

In Exercises 21–24, refer to the data in the table below. The entries are white blood cell counts (1000 cells,ML) and red blood cell counts (million cells,ML) from male subjects examined as part of a large health study conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics. The data are matched, so that the first subject has a white blood cell count of 8.7 and a red blood cell count of 4.91, and so on.

Source of the Data Considering the source of the data, does that source appear to be biased in some way?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free