Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Coke and Diet Coke Data Set 26 “Cola Weights and Volumes” in Appendix B includes theweights (in pounds) of cola for a sample of cans of regular Coke (n = 36, \(\bar x\)= 0.81682 lb,s = 0.00751 lb) and the weights of cola for a sample of cans of Diet Coke (n = 36, \(\bar x\) =0.78479 lb, s = 0.00439 lb). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that variation is thesame for both types of Coke.

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is sufficient evidence to reject the claim that the population variance of the regular coke group is different from the population variance of the diet coke group.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

For a sample of 36 cans of regular Coke, the mean weight of cola is equal to 0.81682 lb, and the standard deviation is equal to 0.00751 lb. For another sample of 36 cans of Diet Coke, the mean weight of cola is equal to 0.78479 lb,and the standard deviation is equal to 0.00439 lb.

It is claimed that the variation in the amount of cola for the regular Coke is equal to the variation in the amount of Cola for the Diet Coke.

02

Hypotheses

Let\({\sigma _1}\)and\({\sigma _2}\)be the population standard deviations of the weight of colafor the regular Coke and the Diet Cokerespectively.

Null Hypothesis:The populationstandard deviationof the weight of colafor the regular Cokeis equal to the population standard deviation of the weight of colafor the Diet Coke.

Symbolically,

\({H_0}:{\sigma _1} = {\sigma _2}\)

Alternative Hypothesis:The populationstandard deviationof the weight of colafor the regular Cokeis not equal to the population standard deviationof the weight of colafor the Diet Coke.

Symbolically,

\({H_1}:{\sigma _1} \ne {\sigma _2}\)

03

Compute the test statistic

Since two independent samples involve a claim about the population standard deviation, apply an F-test.

Consider the larger sample variance to be\(s_1^2\)and the corresponding sample size to be\({n_1}\).

The following values are obtained:

\({\left( {0.00751} \right)^2} = 0.000056\)

\({\left( {0.00439} \right)^2} = 0.000019\)

Here,\(s_1^2\)is the sample variance corresponding to the regular Coke has a value equal to 0.000056 lb squared.

\(s_2^2\)is the sample variance corresponding to the Diet Cokeand has a value equal to 0.000019 lb squared.

Substitute the respective values to calculate the F statistic:

\(\begin{array}{c}F = \frac{{{{\left( {0.00751} \right)}^2}}}{{{{\left( {0.00439} \right)}^2}}}\\ = 2.927\end{array}\)

Thus, F is equal to 2.927.

04

Critical value and p-value

The value of the numerator degrees of freedom is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}{n_1} - 1 = 36 - 1\\ = 35\end{array}\)

The value of the denominator degrees of freedom is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}{n_2} - 1 = 36 - 1\\ = 35\end{array}\)

For the F test, the critical value corresponding to the right-tail is considered.

The critical value can be obtained using the F-distribution table with numerator degrees of freedom equal to 35 and denominator degrees of freedom equal to 35 for a right-tailed test.

The level of significance is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}\frac{\alpha }{2} = \frac{{0.05}}{2}\\ = 0.025\end{array}\)

Thus, the critical value is equal to 1.9611.

The two-tailed p-value for F equal to 2.927 is equal to 0.0020.

05

Conclusion

Since the test statistic value is greater than the critical value and the p-value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.

Thus, there is enough evidence to rejectthe claimthat variation is the same for both types of Coke.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Denomination Effect Construct the confidence interval that could be used to test the claim in Exercise 1. What feature of the confidence interval leads to the same conclusion from Exercise 1?

Equivalence of Hypothesis Test and Confidence Interval Two different simple random samples are drawn from two different populations. The first sample consists of 20 people with 10 having a common attribute. The second sample consists of 2000 people with 1404 of them having the same common attribute. Compare the results from a hypothesis test of \({p_1} = {p_2}\) (with a 0.05 significance level) and a 95% confidence interval estimate of \({p_1} - {p_2}\).

Hypothesis and conclusions refer to the hypothesis test described in exercise 1.

a. Identify the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis

b. If the p-value for test is reported as “less than 0.001,” what should we conclude about the original claim?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

License Plate Laws The Chapter Problem involved passenger cars in Connecticut and passenger cars in New York, but here we consider passenger cars and commercial trucks. Among2049 Connecticut passenger cars, 239 had only rear license plates. Among 334 Connecticuttrucks, 45 had only rear license plates (based on samples collected by the author). A reasonable hypothesis is that passenger car owners violate license plate laws at a higher rate than owners of commercial trucks. Use a 0.05 significance level to test that hypothesis.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

Critical Thinking: Did the NFL Rule Change Have the Desired Effect? Among 460 overtime National Football League (NFL) games between 1974 and 2011, 252 of the teams that won the overtime coin toss went on to win the game. During those years, a team could win the coin toss and march down the field to win the game with a field goal, and the other team would never get possession of the ball. That just didn’t seem fair. Starting in 2012, the overtime rules were changed. In the first three years with the new overtime rules, 47 games were decided in overtime and the team that won the coin toss won 24 of those games. Analyzing the Results

First explore the two proportions of overtime wins. Does there appear to be a difference? If so, how?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free