Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Body TemperaturesListed below are body temperatures from seven different subjects measuredat two different times in a day (from Data Set 3 “Body Temperatures” in Appendix B).

a.Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that there is no difference between body temperaturesmeasured at 8 AM and at 12 AM.

b.Construct the confidence interval that could be used for the hypothesis test described in part(a). What feature of the confidence interval leads to the same conclusion reached in part (a)

Body Temperature\(\left( {^{\bf{0}}{\bf{F}}} \right)\) at 8AM

96.6

97.0

97.0

97.8

97.0

97.4

96.6

Body Temperature\(\left( {^{\bf{0}}{\bf{F}}} \right)\) at 12AM

99.0

98.4

98.0

98.6

98.5

98.9

98.4

Short Answer

Expert verified

a.There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a difference between the body temperature measured between 8 AM and 12 AM.

b.The confidence interval is equal to (-1.970, -1.001).The feature that the confidence interval does not contain the value 0 and contains all negative values indicates that the mean value of the differences will always be less than 0. Hence, there is sufficient evidence to reject the claim there is a difference between the body temperatures measured between 8 AM and 12 AM have a mean equal to 0.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The body temperatures of a set of 7 subjects are recorded, first at 8 AM and then at 12 AM. Therefore, the sample size is equal to \(n = 5\). It is claimed that there is no difference between the body temperatures measured at 8 AM and 12 AM.

02

Hypothesis

The following hypotheses are noted:

Null Hypothesis: The difference between the body temperatures measured at 8 AM and 12 AM is equal to 0.

\({H_0}:{\mu _d} = 0\)

Alternative Hypothesis: The difference between the body temperatures measured at 8 AM and 12 AM is not equal to 0.

\({H_1}:{\mu _d} \ne 0\)

Since the alternative hypothesis contains a not equal sign, it is a two-tailed test.

03

Differences

The following table shows the differences in temperatures for each pair:

Temperature\(\left( {^0F} \right)\)at 8 AM

96.6

97.0

97.0

97.8

97

97.4

96.6

Temperature\(\left( {^0F} \right)\)at 12 AM

99

98.4

98.0

98.6

98.5

98.9

98.4

Differences\(\left( d \right)\)

-2.4

-1.4

-1

-0.8

-1.5

-1.5

-1.8

\(\sum d = - 10.4\)

04

Find the mean value of the differences of matched pairs

Themean value of the differences between thebody temperatures at 8 AM and 12 AM:

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar d = \frac{{\sum d }}{n}\\ = \frac{{ - 10.4}}{7}\\ = - 1.49\end{array}\)

Thus, the mean value is -1.49 degrees Fahrenheit.

05

Compute the standard deviation

Thestandard deviation of thedifferences between the body temperaturesis:

\(\begin{array}{c}{s_d} = \sqrt {\frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{{\left( {{d_i} - \bar d} \right)}^2}} }}{{n - 1}}} \\ = \sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( { - 2.4 - \left( { - 1.49} \right)} \right)}^2} + {{\left( { - 1.4 - \left( { - 1.49} \right)} \right)}^2} + ...... + {{\left( { - 1.8 - \left( { - 1.49} \right)} \right)}^2}}}{{7 - 1}}} \\ = 0.52\end{array}\)

The standard deviation is 0.52 degrees Fahrenheit.

06

Compute the test statistic

The test statistic for matched pair is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}t = \frac{{\bar d - {\mu _d}}}{{\frac{{{s_d}}}{{\sqrt n }}}}\\ = \frac{{ - 1.49 - 0}}{{\frac{{0.52}}{{\sqrt 7 }}}}\\ = - 7.50\end{array}\)

Thus, t=-7.50.

07

Compute the degrees of freedom

The value of the degrees of freedom is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}df = n - 1\\ = 7 - 1\\ = 6\end{array}\)

08

Compute the critical value

Referring to the t-distribution table, use the column for 0.05 (Area in One Tail),and use the row with 6 degrees of freedom to find the critical value.

\(\begin{array}{c}{t_{crit}} = {t_\alpha },df\\ = {t_{0.05}},6\\ = \left( { - 2.4469,2.4469} \right)\end{array}\)

Thus, the critical value is (-2.4469, 2.4469).

09

Decision rule

a.

For a two-tailed test, reject the null hypothesis if the calculated test statistic does not lie in the interval of critical values.

Here -7.58 does not lie in the interval -2.45 and +2.45.

Hence reject the null hypothesis.

There is sufficient evidence to reject the claim that the differences between the body temperatures measured between 8 AM and 12 AM have a mean value equal to 0.

10

Find the margin of the error to compute the confidence interval

If the level of significance used in the one-tailed hypothesis test is equal to 0.04, then construct a 90% confidence interval.

The margin of error is equal to:

\(\)\(\begin{array}{c}E = {t_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}} \times \frac{{{s_d}}}{{\sqrt n }}\\ = 2.4469 \times \frac{{0.52}}{{\sqrt 7 }}\\ = 0.485\end{array}\)

11

Confidence interval

b.

The formula for the confidence interval is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}CI = \bar d - E < {\mu _d} < \bar d + E\\ = - 1.49 - 0.485 < {\mu _d} < - 1.49 + 0.485\\ = - 1.970 < {\mu _d} < - 1.001\end{array}\)

Thus, the confidence interval is equal to (-1.970, -1.001).

Here clearly, one can see that 0 is not included in the interval.

Therefore, the mean differences cannot be equal to zero.

Hencethere is sufficient evidence to reject the claim that there is a difference between the body temperatures measured between 8 AM and 12 AM have a mean equal to 0.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Denomination Effect A trial was conducted with 75 women in China given a 100-yuan bill, while another 75 women in China were given 100 yuan in the form of smaller bills (a 50-yuan bill plus two 20-yuan bills plus two 5-yuan bills). Among those given the single bill, 60 spent some or all of the money. Among those given the smaller bills, 68 spent some or all of the money (based on data from “The Denomination Effect,” by Raghubir and Srivastava, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 36). We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that when given a single large bill, a smaller proportion of women in China spend some or all of the money when compared to the proportion of women in China given the same amount in smaller bills.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. If the significance level is changed to 0.01, does the conclusion change?

In Exercises 5–20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with “Table” answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\).) Is Old Faithful Not Quite So Faithful? Listed below are time intervals (min) between eruptions of the Old Faithful geyser. The “recent” times are within the past few years, and the “past” times are from 1995. Does it appear that the mean time interval has changed? Is the conclusion affected by whether the significance level is 0.05 or 0.01?

Recent

78

91

89

79

57

100

62

87

70

88

82

83

56

81

74

102

61

Past

89

88

97

98

64

85

85

96

87

95

90

95

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Cardiac Arrest at Day and Night A study investigated survival rates for in hospital patients who suffered cardiac arrest. Among 58,593 patients who had cardiac arrest during the day, 11,604 survived and were discharged. Among 28,155 patients who suffered cardiac arrest at night, 4139 survived and were discharged (based on data from “Survival from In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During Nights and Weekends,” by Puberty et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 299, No. 7). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the survival rates are the same for day and night.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, does it appear that for in-hospital patients who suffer cardiac arrest, the survival rate is the same for day and night?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

License Plate Laws The Chapter Problem involved passenger cars in Connecticut and passenger cars in New York, but here we consider passenger cars and commercial trucks. Among2049 Connecticut passenger cars, 239 had only rear license plates. Among 334 Connecticuttrucks, 45 had only rear license plates (based on samples collected by the author). A reasonable hypothesis is that passenger car owners violate license plate laws at a higher rate than owners of commercial trucks. Use a 0.05 significance level to test that hypothesis.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

Magnet Treatment of Pain People spend around $5 billion annually for the purchase of magnets used to treat a wide variety of pains. Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, and the results given below are among the results obtained in the study (based on data from “Bipolar Permanent Magnets for the Treatment of Chronic Lower Back Pain: A Pilot Study,” by Collacott, Zimmerman, White, and Rindone, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 283, No. 10). Higher scores correspond to greater pain levels.

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment (similar to a placebo).

b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Does it appear that magnets are effective in treating back pain? Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger?

Reduction in Pain Level after Magnet Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.49, s = 0.96

Reduction in Pain Level after Sham Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.44, s = 1.4

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free