Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In Exercises 1–5, use the following survey results: Randomly selected subjects were asked if they were aware that the Earth has lost half of its wildlife population during the past 50 years. Among 1121 women, 23% said that they were aware. Among 1084 men, 26% said that they were aware (based on data from a Harris poll).

Biodiversity Assume that a P-value of 0.1 is obtained when testing the claim given in Exercise 1 “Biodiversity.” What should be concluded about the null hypothesis? What should be the final conclusion?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The null hypothesis fails to be rejected.

There is insufficient evidence to reject the claim that the proportion of women who were aware of the fact is equal to the proportion of men who were aware of the fact.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1: Given information

In a sample of 1121 women, 23% said that they were aware of the fact that the Earth has lost half of its wildlife population during the past 50 years. In another sample of 1048 men, 26% said that they were aware that the Earth has lost half of its wildlife population during the past 50 years.

It is claimed that the proportion of women who were about the fact is equal to the proportion of men who were aware of the fact.

02

Formulation of the hypotheses

Null hypothesis: The proportion of women who were aware of the factis equal to the proportion of men who were aware of the fact.

\({H_0}\):\({p_1} = {p_2}\).

Alternative hypothesis:The proportion of women who were aware of the factis not equal to the proportion of men who were aware of the fact.

\({H_1}\):\({p_1} \ne {p_2}\)

03

Interpretation of the p-value

The p-value is equal to 0.1.

Let the level of significance be equal to 0.05.

Since the p-value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis fails to be rejected.

There is insufficient evidence to reject the claimthat the proportion of women who were aware of the factis equal to the proportion of men who were aware of the fact.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assessing Normality Interpret the normal quantile plot of heights of fathers.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Tennis Challenges Since the Hawk-Eye instant replay system for tennis was introduced at the U.S. Open in 2006, men challenged 2441 referee calls, with the result that 1027 of the calls were overturned. Women challenged 1273 referee calls, and 509 of the calls were overturned. We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that men and women have equal success in challenging calls.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, does it appear that men and women have equal success in challenging calls?

Family Heights. In Exercises 1–5, use the following heights (in.) The data are matched so that each column consists of heights from the same family.

Father

68.0

68.0

65.5

66.0

67.5

70.0

68.0

71.0

Mother

64.0

60.0

63.0

59.0

62.0

69.0

65.5

66.0

Son

71.0

64.0

71.0

68.0

70.0

71.0

71.7

71.0

Scatterplot Construct a scatterplot of the father/son heights, then interpret it.

A sample size that will ensure a margin of error of at most the one specified.

In Exercises 5–20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with “Table” answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\).)

IQ and Lead Exposure Data Set 7 “IQ and Lead” in Appendix B lists full IQ scores for a random sample of subjects with low lead levels in their blood and another random sample of subjects with high lead levels in their blood. The statistics are summarized below.

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the mean IQ score of people with low blood lead levels is higher than the mean IQ score of people with high blood lead levels.

b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Does exposure to lead appear to have an effect on IQ scores?

Low Blood Lead Level: n = 78, \(\bar x\) = 92.88462, s = 15.34451

High Blood Lead Level: n = 21,\(\bar x\)= 86.90476, s = 8.988352

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free