Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Hypothesis Test Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that differences between heights of fathers and their sons have a mean of 0 in.

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is insufficient evidence to reject the claim that the difference in the heights of fathers and sons has a 0-inch mean difference at 0.05 level of significance.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Refer to Exercise 1 for the heights of fathers and sons.

Fathers

Sons

68.0

71.0

68.0

64.0

65.5

71.0

66.0

68.0

67.5

70.0

70.0

71.0

68.0

71.7

71.0

71.0

02

Determine the statistic measures from the sample points

Define a random variable Das the difference between the heights of fathers and sons.

Father

Son

Difference (D)

68

71

–3

68

64

4

65.5

71

–5.5

66

68

–2

67.5

70

–2.5

70

71

–1

68

71.7

–3.7

71

71

0

The sample mean and standard deviation of differences is calculated below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}\bar d &= \frac{{\sum {{D_i}} }}{n}\\ &= \frac{{ - 13.7}}{8}\\ &= - 1.713\end{aligned}\)

The standard deviation of differencesiscalculated below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{s_D} &= \sqrt {\frac{{\sum {{{\left( {{D_i} - \bar d} \right)}^2}} }}{{n - 1}}} \\ &= \sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( { - 3 - \left( { - 1.713} \right)} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {4 - \left( { - 1.713} \right)} \right)}^2} + ... + {{\left( {0 - \left( { - 1.713} \right)} \right)}^2}}}{{8 - 1}}} \\ &= 2.847\end{aligned}\)

03

Identify the hypotheses

Let be the true mean heights of the population of fathers and sons.

Define \({\mu _F} - {\mu _S} = {\mu _d}\).

The hypotheses are statedbelow:

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_o}:{\mu _d} = 0\\{H_a}:{\mu _d} \ne 0\end{array}\)

04

Determine the test statistic

The test statistic is shown below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}t &= \frac{{\bar d - {\mu _D}}}{{\frac{{{s_D}}}{{\sqrt n }}}}\\ &= \frac{{ - 1.713 - 0}}{{\frac{{2.847}}{{\sqrt 8 }}}}\\ &= - 1.702\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the test statistic is –1.702.

05

Determine the decision and conclusion of the test

The degree of freedom is

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df &= n - 1\\ &= 8 - 1\\ &= 7.\end{aligned}\)

The p-value is computed from the t-distribution table.

\(\begin{aligned}{c}p{\rm{ - value}} &= 2P\left( {T < - 1.702} \right)\\ &= 0.1325\end{aligned}\)

Since the p-value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis cannot be rejected.

Thus, there is not enough evidence to rejectthe claim that the differences in heights of fathers and sons have a true mean of0.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Denomination Effect In the article “The Denomination Effect” by Priya Raghubir and Joydeep Srivastava, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 36, researchers reported results from studies conducted to determine whether people have different spending characteristics when they have larger bills, such as a \(20 bill, instead of smaller bills, such as twenty \)1 bills. In one trial, 89 undergraduate business students from two different colleges were randomly assigned to two different groups. In the “dollar bill” group, 46 subjects were given dollar bills; the “quarter” group consisted of 43 subjects given quarters. All subjects from both groups were given a choice of keeping the money or buying gum or mints. The article includes the claim that “money in a large denomination is less likely to be spent relative to an equivalent amount in smaller denominations.” Test that claim using a 0.05 significance level with the following sample data from the study.

Interpreting Displays.

In Exercises 5 and 6, use the results from the given displays.

Treating Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common wrist complaintresulting from a compressed nerve, and it is often the result of extended use of repetitive wristmovements, such as those associated with the use of a keyboard. In a randomized controlledtrial, 73 patients were treated with surgery and 67 were found to have successful treatments.Among 83 patients treated with splints, 60 were found to have successful treatments (based ondata from “Splinting vs Surgery in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome,” by Gerritsenet al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 288, No. 10). Use the accompanyingStatCrunch display with a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the success rate is better with surgery.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Overlap of Confidence Intervals In the article “On Judging the Significance of Differences by Examining the Overlap Between Confidence Intervals,” by Schenker and Gentleman (American Statistician, Vol. 55, No. 3), the authors consider sample data in this statement: “Independent simple random samples, each of size 200, have been drawn, and 112 people in the first sample have the attribute, whereas 88 people in the second sample have the attribute.”

a. Use the methods of this section to construct a 95% confidence interval estimate of the difference\({p_1} - {p_2}\). What does the result suggest about the equality of \({p_1}\) and \({p_2}\)?

b. Use the methods of Section 7-1 to construct individual 95% confidence interval estimates for each of the two population proportions. After comparing the overlap between the two confidence intervals, what do you conclude about the equality of \({p_1}\) and \({p_2}\)?

c. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the two population proportions are equal. What do you conclude?

d. Based on the preceding results, what should you conclude about the equality of \({p_1}\) and \({p_2}\)? Which of the three preceding methods is least effective in testing for the equality of \({p_1}\) and \({p_2}\)?

Magnet Treatment of Pain People spend around $5 billion annually for the purchase of magnets used to treat a wide variety of pains. Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, and the results given below are among the results obtained in the study (based on data from “Bipolar Permanent Magnets for the Treatment of Chronic Lower Back Pain: A Pilot Study,” by Collacott, Zimmerman, White, and Rindone, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 283, No. 10). Higher scores correspond to greater pain levels.

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment (similar to a placebo).

b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Does it appear that magnets are effective in treating back pain? Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger?

Reduction in Pain Level after Magnet Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.49, s = 0.96

Reduction in Pain Level after Sham Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.44, s = 1.4

Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with “Table” answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\))

Regular Coke and Diet Coke Data Set 26 “Cola Weights and Volumes” in Appendix B includesweights (lb) of the contents of cans of Diet Coke (n= 36,\(\overline x \)= 0.78479 lb, s= 0.00439 lb) and of the contents of cans of regular Coke (n= 36,\(\overline x \)= 0.81682 lb, s= 0.00751 lb).

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the contents of cans of Diet Coke have weights with a mean that is less than the mean for regular Coke.

b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Can you explain why cans of Diet Coke would weigh less than cans of regular Coke?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free