Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Using Confidence Intervals

a. Assume that we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that p1 < p2. Which is better: A hypothesis test or a confidence interval?

b. In general, when dealing with inferences for two population proportions, which two of the following are equivalent: confidence interval method; P-value method; critical value method?

c. If we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that p1 < p2, what confidence level should we use?

d. If we test the claim in part (c) using the sample data in Exercise 1, we get this confidence interval: -0.000508 < p1 - p2 < - 0.000309. What does this confidence interval suggest about the claim?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. A hypothesis test is better than a confidence interval.

b. The p-value method and critical value method are equivalent.

c. The 90% confidence interval to test the claim is made about the difference between two population proportion \({p_1}{\rm{ and }}{p_2}\).

d. The given confidence interval suggests that there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that \({p_1} < {p_2}\).

Step by step solution

01

Describe the methods of Inferences about two proportion.

a.The following methods can be used for comparing two population proportion:

1. Hypothesis test

2. Confidence Interval

The hypothesis test is used to test the claims about two population proportions. The confidence interval is used when estimating about the differences between two population proportions.

A hypothesis test is recommended for testing a claim at 0.05 level of significance.

Hence, in this case hypothesis test is better than confidence interval.

02

Check equivalency of three methods

b.In a hypothesis test, there are two methods to test the claims about population proportion,

1. P-value method

2. Critical value method

Both methods are used to test the claim made about two proportions. In p-value method, a probability value is compared to a significance level to make a decision while in critical value method, the test statistic is compared to critical value(s) to make a decision about hypotheses.

The method of confidence interval is used primarily to estimate the difference between two population proportions.

Thus, the P-value method and critical value method are equivalent.

03

State the confidence level

c. As per the table 8-1, for one tailed significance test at 0.05 level of significance, 90% confidence level is recommended.

04

Step 4:Make conclusion about the claim

d. Refer to exercise 1 for the claim stated as,

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_o}:{p_1} = {p_2}\\{H_a}:{p_1} < {p_2}\end{array}\)

Where \({p_1},{p_2}\) are population proportion of children who developed polio after vaccine and in control group respectively.

The given confidence interval is\( - 0.000508 < {p_1} - {p_2} < - 0.000309\).

This confidence does not contain zero. Thus, there is significant difference between two proportion\({{\rm{p}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{ and }}{{\rm{p}}_{\rm{2}}}\).

Therefore, the given confidence interval suggests that there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that \({p_1}{\rm{ }}\)is less that \({p_2}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7โ€“22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim

Question:Headache Treatment In a study of treatments for very painful โ€œclusterโ€ headaches, 150 patients were treated with oxygen and 148 other patients were given a placebo consisting of ordinary air. Among the 150 patients in the oxygen treatment group, 116 were free from head- aches 15 minutes after treatment. Among the 148 patients given the placebo, 29 were free from headaches 15 minutes after treatment (based on data from โ€œHigh-Flow Oxygen for Treatment of Cluster Headache,โ€ by Cohen, Burns, and Goads by, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 302, No. 22). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the oxygen treatment is effective.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, is the oxygen treatment effective?

Hypothesis and conclusions refer to the hypothesis test described in exercise 1.

a. Identify the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis

b. If the p-value for test is reported as โ€œless than 0.001,โ€ what should we conclude about the original claim?

In Exercises 5โ€“20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with โ€œTableโ€ answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of n1โˆ’1 and n2โˆ’1.)Coke and Pepsi Data Set 26 โ€œCola Weights and Volumesโ€ in Appendix B includes volumes of the contents of cans of regular Coke (n = 36, x = 12.19 oz, s = 0.11 oz) and volumes of the contents of cans of regular Pepsi (n = 36, x = 12.29 oz, s = 0.09 oz).

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that cans of regular Coke and regular Pepsi have the same mean volume.

b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. What do you conclude? Does there appear to be a difference? Is there practical significance?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7โ€“22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Is Echinacea Effective for Colds? Rhinoviruses typically cause common colds. In a test of the effectiveness of Echinacea, 40 of the 45 subjects treated with Echinacea developed rhinovirus infections. In a placebo group, 88 of the 103 subjects developed rhinovirus infections (based on data from โ€œAn Evaluation of Echinacea Angustifolia in Experimental Rhinovirus Infections,โ€ by Turner et al., New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 353, No. 4). We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that Echinacea has an effect on rhinovirus infections.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, does Echinacea appear to have any effect on the infection rate?

Verifying requirements in the largest clinical trial ever conducted, 401,974 children were randomly assigned to two groups. The treatment group considered of 201,229 children given the sulk vaccine for polio, and 33 of those children developed polio. The other 200,745 children were given a placebo, and 115 of those children developed polio. If we want to use the methods of this section to test the claim that the rate of polio is less for children given the sulk vaccine, are the requirements for a hypothesis test satisfied? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free