Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In Exercises 5–20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with “Table” answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\).)Blanking Out on Tests Many students have had the unpleasant experience of panicking on a test because the first question was exceptionally difficult. The arrangement of test items was studied for its effect on anxiety. The following scores are measures of “debilitating test anxiety,” which most of us call panic or blanking out (based on data from “Item Arrangement, Cognitive Entry Characteristics, Sex and Test Anxiety as Predictors of Achievement in Examination Performance,” by Klimko, Journal of Experimental Education, Vol. 52, No. 4.) Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that the two populations of scores have different means? Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that the arrangement of the test items has an effect on the score? Is the conclusion affected by whether the significance level is 0.05 or 0.01?

Questions Arranged from Easy to Difficult

24.64

39.29

16.32

32.83

28.02

33.31

20.60

21.13

26.69

28.9

26.43

24.23

7.10

32.86

21.06

28.89

28.71

31.73

30.02

21.96

25.49

38.81

27.85

30.29

30.72

Questions Arranged from Difficult to Easy

33.62

34.02

26.63

30.26

35.91

26.68

29.49

35.32

27.24

32.34

29.34

33.53

27.62

42.91

30.20

32.54

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the arrangement of the questions has an effect on the score at a 0.05 significance level.

There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the arrangement of the questions has an effect on the score at a 0.01 level of significance.

Thus, the conclusion of the claim changes with the change in the significance level.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1: Given information

Data are given on the anxiety scores for the two different arrangements of questions on a test.

02

Formulation of the hypotheses

Null hypothesis:The two populations of scores have the same mean.

\({H_0}\):\({\mu _1} = {\mu _2}\).

Alternative hypothesis:The two populations of scores have different means.

\({H_1}\):\({\mu _1} \ne {\mu _2}\).

03

Calculation of samplemeans

The mean score corresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\bar x}_1} = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_1}} {{x_i}} }}{{{n_1}}}\\ = \frac{{24.64 + 39.29 + .... + 30.72}}{{25}}\\ = 27.12\end{array}\)

Therefore, the mean score corresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult is equal to 27.12.

The mean score corresponding to the arrangement of questions fromdifficult to easy is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\bar x}_2} = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_2}} {{x_i}} }}{{{n_2}}}\\ = \frac{{33.62 + 34.02 + .... + 32.54}}{{16}}\\ = 31.73\end{array}\)

Therefore, the mean score corresponding to the arrangement of questions fromdifficult to easy is equal to 31.73.

04

Calculation of sample standard deviations

The standard deviation ofthe scorescorresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}{s_1} = \sqrt {\frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_1}} {{{({x_i} - {{\bar x}_1})}^2}} }}{{{n_1} - 1}}} \\ = \sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( {24.64 - 27.12} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {39.29 - 27.12} \right)}^2} + .... + {{\left( {30.72 - 27.12} \right)}^2}}}{{25 - 1}}} \\ = 6.86\end{array}\)

Therefore, the standard deviation ofthe scorescorresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult is equal to 6.86.

The standard deviation of the scorescorresponding to the arrangement of questions fromdifficult to easy is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}{s_2} = \sqrt {\frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_2}} {{{({x_i} - {{\bar x}_2})}^2}} }}{{{n_2} - 1}}} \\ = \sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( {33.62 - 31.73} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {34.02 - 31.73} \right)}^2} + .... + {{\left( {32.54 - 31.73} \right)}^2}}}{{16 - 1}}} \\ = 4.26\end{array}\)

Therefore, the standard deviation of the scores corresponding to the arrangement of questions fromdifficult to easy is equal to 4.26.

05

Calculation of the test statistic

Under null hypothesis,\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 0\).

The test statistic is given by

\(\begin{array}{c}t = \frac{{\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }}\\ = \frac{{\left( {27.12 - 31.73} \right) - \left( 0 \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( {6.86} \right)}^2}}}{{25}} + \frac{{{{\left( {4.26} \right)}^2}}}{{16}}} }}\\ = - 2.657\end{array}\)

Thus, the calculated value of the test statistic is -2.657.

06

Computation of critical value

Degrees of freedom: The smaller of the two values\(\left( {{n_1} - 1} \right)\)and\(\left( {{n_2} - 1} \right)\)is considered as the degreesof freedom.

\(\begin{array}{c}\left( {{n_1} - 1} \right) = \left( {25 - 1} \right)\\ = 24\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{c}\left( {{n_2} - 1} \right) = \left( {16 - 1} \right)\\ = 15\end{array}\)

The value of the degrees of freedom is equal to the minimum of (24,15),which is 15.

Now see the t-distribution table for the two-tailed test at a 0.05 level of significance and for 15 degrees of freedom.

The critical values are -2.1314 and 2.1314. The p-value for the test statistic value equal to -2.657 is equal to 0.0180.

The value of the test statistic does not lie between the critical values, and the p-value is less than 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected.

07

Conclusion

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the arrangement of the questions has an effect on the score at a 0.05 significance level.

08

Changing the level of significance

Let the level of significance be equal to 0.01.

Referring to the t-distribution table, the critical values of t at\(\alpha = 0.01\) with 15 degrees of freedom for a two-tailed test are -2.9467 and 2.9467.

The p-value remains the same and is equal to 0.0180.

The test statistic value equal to -2.657 lies between the two critical values, and the p-value is greater than 0.01.

There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the arrangement of the questions has an effect on the scoreat a 0.01 level of significance.

Thus, the conclusion of the claim changes with the change in thesignificance level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Verifying requirements in the largest clinical trial ever conducted, 401,974 children were randomly assigned to two groups. The treatment group considered of 201,229 children given the sulk vaccine for polio, and 33 of those children developed polio. The other 200,745 children were given a placebo, and 115 of those children developed polio. If we want to use the methods of this section to test the claim that the rate of polio is less for children given the sulk vaccine, are the requirements for a hypothesis test satisfied? Explain.

Braking Reaction Times: Histogram Listed below are sorted braking reaction times (in 1>10,000 sec) for male and female subjects (based on data from the RT-2S Brake Reaction Time Tester). Construct a histogram for the reaction times of males. Use a class width of 8 and use 28 as the lower limit of the first class. For the horizontal axis, use class midpoint values. Does it appear that the data are from a population with a normal distribution?

Males

28

30

31

34

34

36

36

36

36

38

39

40

40

40

40

41

41

41

42

42

44

46

47

48

48

49

51

53

54

54

56

57

60

61

61

63

Females

22

24

34

36

36

37

39

41

41

43

43

45

45

47

53

54

54

55

56

57

57

57

58

61

62

63

66

67

68

71

72

76

77

78

79

80

Using Confidence Intervals

a. Assume that we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that p1 < p2. Which is better: A hypothesis test or a confidence interval?

b. In general, when dealing with inferences for two population proportions, which two of the following are equivalent: confidence interval method; P-value method; critical value method?

c. If we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that p1 < p2, what confidence level should we use?

d. If we test the claim in part (c) using the sample data in Exercise 1, we get this confidence interval: -0.000508 < p1 - p2 < - 0.000309. What does this confidence interval suggest about the claim?

Independent and Dependent Samples Which of the following involve independent samples?

a. Data Set 14 “Oscar Winner Age” in Appendix B includes pairs of ages of actresses and actors at the times that they won Oscars for Best Actress and Best Actor categories. The pair of ages of the winners is listed for each year, and each pair consists of ages matched according to the year that the Oscars were won.

b. Data Set 15 “Presidents” in Appendix B includes heights of elected presidents along with the heights of their main opponents. The pair of heights is listed for each election.

c. Data Set 26 “Cola Weights and Volumes” in Appendix B includes the volumes of the contents in 36 cans of regular Coke and the volumes of the contents in 36 cans of regular Pepsi.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Dreaming in Black and White A study was conducted to determine the proportion of people who dream in black and white instead of color. Among 306 people over the age of 55, 68 dream in black and white, and among 298 people under the age of 25, 13 dream in black and white (based on data from “Do We Dream in Color?” by Eva Murzyn, Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 17, No. 4). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the proportion of people over 55 who dream in black and white is greater than the proportion of those under 25.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. An explanation given for the results is that those over the age of 55 grew up exposed to media that was mostly displayed in black and white. Can the results from parts (a) and (b) be used to verify that explanation?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free