Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Critical Thinking: Did the NFL Rule Change Have the Desired Effect? Among 460 overtime National Football League (NFL) games between 1974 and 2011, 252 of the teams that won the overtime coin toss went on to win the game. During those years, a team could win the coin toss and march down the field to win the game with a field goal, and the other team would never get possession of the ball. That just didn’t seem fair. Starting in 2012, the overtime rules were changed. In the first three years with the new overtime rules, 47 games were decided in overtime and the team that won the coin toss won 24 of those games. Analyzing the Results

First explore the two proportions of overtime wins. Does there appear to be a difference? If so, how?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The sample proportion of overtime wins before the rules were changed is equal to 0.548.

The sample proportion of overtime wins after the rules were changed is equal to 0.511.

There appears to be a difference in the two sample proportions of overtime wins. This implies that the change in the rules reduced the number of overtime wins that were previously won unfairly.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

In the years between 1974 and 2011, out of 460 overtime games, 252 games were won by the team that won the coin toss.

In the first 3 years beginning from 2012, there were 47 overtime games, and 24 of those games were won by the team that won the coin toss.

02

Sample Proportions

The sample proportion of overtime wins before the rules were changed (between 1974 and 2011) is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{{\hat p}_1} &= \frac{{{\rm{Number}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\rm{overtime}}\;{\rm{wins}}}}{{{\rm{Total}}\;{\rm{number}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\rm{overtime}}\;{\rm{games}}}}\\ &= \frac{{252}}{{460}}\\ &= 0.548\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the sample proportion of overtime wins between 1974 and 2011 is equal to 0.548.

The sample proportion of overtime wins after the rules were changed (in the first three years starting from 2012) is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{{\hat p}_2} &= \frac{{{\rm{Number}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\rm{overtime}}\;{\rm{wins}}}}{{{\rm{Total}}\;{\rm{number}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\rm{overtime}}\;{\rm{games}}}}\\ &= \frac{{24}}{{47}}\\ &= 0.511\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the sample proportion of overtime wins after the rules were changed is equal to 0.511.

03

Comparison

There appears to be a difference in the two sample proportions of overtime wins.

This suggests that the change in the rules lowered the number of overtime wins that were previously won unfairly.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Dreaming in Black and White A study was conducted to determine the proportion of people who dream in black and white instead of color. Among 306 people over the age of 55, 68 dream in black and white, and among 298 people under the age of 25, 13 dream in black and white (based on data from “Do We Dream in Color?” by Eva Murzyn, Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 17, No. 4). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the proportion of people over 55 who dream in black and white is greater than the proportion of those under 25.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. An explanation given for the results is that those over the age of 55 grew up exposed to media that was mostly displayed in black and white. Can the results from parts (a) and (b) be used to verify that explanation?

Independent and Dependent Samples Which of the following involve independent samples?

a. Data Set 14 “Oscar Winner Age” in Appendix B includes pairs of ages of actresses and actors at the times that they won Oscars for Best Actress and Best Actor categories. The pair of ages of the winners is listed for each year, and each pair consists of ages matched according to the year that the Oscars were won.

b. Data Set 15 “Presidents” in Appendix B includes heights of elected presidents along with the heights of their main opponents. The pair of heights is listed for each election.

c. Data Set 26 “Cola Weights and Volumes” in Appendix B includes the volumes of the contents in 36 cans of regular Coke and the volumes of the contents in 36 cans of regular Pepsi.

Are Flights Cheaper When Scheduled Earlier? Listed below are the costs (in dollars) of flights from New York (JFK) to Los Angeles (LAX). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that flights scheduled one day in advance cost more than flights scheduled 30 days in advance. What strategy appears to be effective in saving money when flying?

Delta

Jet Blue

American

Virgin

Alaska

United

1 day in advance

501

634

633

646

633

642

30 days in advance

148

149

156

156

252

313

Variation of Heights Use the sample data given in Exercise 3 “Heights” and test the claim that women and men have heights with the same variation. Use a 0.05 significance level.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Is Echinacea Effective for Colds? Rhinoviruses typically cause common colds. In a test of the effectiveness of Echinacea, 40 of the 45 subjects treated with Echinacea developed rhinovirus infections. In a placebo group, 88 of the 103 subjects developed rhinovirus infections (based on data from “An Evaluation of Echinacea Angustifolia in Experimental Rhinovirus Infections,” by Turner et al., New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 353, No. 4). We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that Echinacea has an effect on rhinovirus infections.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, does Echinacea appear to have any effect on the infection rate?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free