Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim

Question:Headache Treatment In a study of treatments for very painful “cluster” headaches, 150 patients were treated with oxygen and 148 other patients were given a placebo consisting of ordinary air. Among the 150 patients in the oxygen treatment group, 116 were free from head- aches 15 minutes after treatment. Among the 148 patients given the placebo, 29 were free from headaches 15 minutes after treatment (based on data from “High-Flow Oxygen for Treatment of Cluster Headache,” by Cohen, Burns, and Goads by, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 302, No. 22). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the oxygen treatment is effective.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, is the oxygen treatment effective?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The null hypothesis is rejected; thus, there is sufficient evidence to claim that the oxygen treatment is effective.

b. The 98% confidence interval is equal to\(\left( {0.467,0.687} \right)\).

c. Yes, the oxygen treatment is effective in curing cluster headaches.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

A sample of 150 patients was treated with oxygen, and among them, 116 were free from headaches 15 minutes after treatment. Another sample of 148 patients was given a placebo, and among them, 29 were free from headaches 15 minutes after treatment. The significance level is \(\alpha = 0.01\) .

02

Describe the hypotheses

It is claimed that oxygen treatment is effective; that is, the proportion of patients free from headache after oxygen treatment is greater than the proportion of patients free from headache after receiving a placebo.

Since the given claim does not have an equality sign, the following hypotheses are set up:

Null Hypothesis: The proportion of patients who are free from headache 15 minutes after oxygen treatment is equal to theproportion of patients who are free from headache 15 minutes after receiving placebo.

\({H_0}:{p_1} = {p_2}\)

Alternative hypothesis: The proportion of patients who are free from headache 15 minutes after oxygen treatment is greater than theproportion of patients who are free from headache 15 minutes after placebo treatment.

\({H_1}:{p_1} > {p_2}\)

The test is right-tailed.

03

Important values

Let \({\hat p_1}\) denote the sampleproportion of patients free from headache 15 minutes after oxygen treatment.

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\hat p}_1} = \frac{{{x_1}}}{{{n_1}}}\\ = \frac{{116}}{{150}}\\ = 0.7733\end{array}\)

Let\({\hat p_2}\) denote the sampleproportionof patients free from headache 15 minutes after receiving placebo.

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\hat p}_2} = \frac{{{x_2}}}{{{n_2}}}\\ = \frac{{29}}{{148}}\\ = 0.1959\end{array}\)

The sample size of patients who weretreated with oxygen treatment\(\left( {{n_1}} \right)\)is equal to 150.

The sample size of patients who weretreated with a placebo\(\left( {{n_2}} \right)\)is equal to 148.

The value of the pooled sample proportion is computed as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar p = \frac{{\left( {{x_1} + {x_2}} \right)}}{{\left( {{n_1} + {n_2}} \right)}}\,\\ = \frac{{\left( {116 + 29} \right)}}{{\left( {150 + 148} \right)}}\\ = 0.4866\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar q = 1 - \bar p\\ = 1 - 0.4866\\ = 0.5134\end{array}\)

04

Find the test statistic

The test statistic is computed as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}z = \frac{{\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - \left( {{p_1} - {p_2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\left( {\frac{{\bar p\bar q}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{\bar p\bar q}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)} }}\\ = \frac{{\left( {0.7733 - 0.1959} \right) - 0}}{{\sqrt {\left( {\frac{{0.4866 \times 0.5134}}{{150}} + \frac{{0.4866 \times 0.5134}}{{148}}} \right)} }}\\ = 9.971\end{array}\)

The value of the test statistic is 9.971.

Referring to the standard normal distribution table, the critical value of z corresponding to\(\alpha = 0.01\)for a right-tailed test is equal to 2.33.

Referring to the standard normal distribution table, the corresponding p-value is equal to 0.0001.

Since the p-value is less than 0.01, the null hypothesis is rejected.

05

Conclusion of the test

a.

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that theproportion of patients who were free from headache 15 minutes after oxygen treatment is greater than the proportion of patients who were free from headache 15 minutes after placebo treatment.

06

Find the confidence interval

b.

The general formula for the confidence interval of difference of proportion is written below:

\({\rm{Confidence}}\,\,{\rm{Interval}} = \left( {\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - E\,\,,\,\,\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) + E} \right)\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,...\left( 1 \right)\)\(\)

Where, E is the margin of error and has the following formula:

\(E = {z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}} \times \sqrt {\left( {\frac{{{{\hat p}_1} \times {{\hat q}_1}}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{{{\hat p}_2} \times {{\hat q}_2}}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)} \)

For computing the confidence interval, first find the critical value\({z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\).

The confidence level is 98% if the level of significance used in the one-railed test is 0.01 (part a.).

Thus, the value of the level of significance for the confidence interval becomes\(\alpha = 0.02\).

Hence,

\(\begin{array}{c}\frac{\alpha }{2} = \frac{{0.02}}{2}\\ = 0.01\end{array}\)

The value of\({z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\)form the standard normal table is equal to 2.33.

Now, the margin of error (E) is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}E = {z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}} \times \sqrt {\left( {\frac{{{{\hat p}_1} \times {{\hat q}_1}}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{{{\hat p}_2} \times {{\hat q}_2}}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)} \\ = 2.33 \times \sqrt {\left( {\frac{{0.7733 \times 0.2267}}{{150}} + \frac{{0.1959 \times 0.8041}}{{148}}} \right)} \\ = 0.1101\end{array}\)

Substitute the value of E in equation (1) as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{Confidence}}\,\,{\rm{Interval}} = \left( {\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - E\,\,,\,\,\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) + E} \right)\\ = \left( {\left( {0.7733 - 0.1959} \right) - 0.1101\,\,,\,\,\left( {0.7733 - 0.1959} \right) + 0.1101} \right)\\ = \left( {0.467,0.687} \right)\end{array}\)

Thus, the 98% confidence interval for the difference between two proportions is\(\left( {0.467,0.687} \right)\).

Since the confidence interval does not include the value of 0 and includes all positive values, it can be concluded that the proportion of patients who are free from headache 15 minutes after oxygen treatment is greater than theproportion of patients who are free from headache 15 minutes after receiving placebo.

07

Effectiveness of the treatment

c.

From the results, it can be concluded thatthe oxygen treatment is effective because the proportion of patients free from headache after oxygen treatment is greater than the proportion of patients free from headache after receiving a placebo.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Does Aspirin Prevent Heart Disease? In a trial designed to test the effectiveness of aspirin in preventing heart disease, 11,037 male physicians were treated with aspirin and 11,034 male physicians were given placebos. Among the subjects in the aspirin treatment group, 139 experienced myocardial infarctions (heart attacks). Among the subjects given placebos, 239 experienced myocardial infarctions (based on data from “Final Report on the Aspirin Component of the Ongoing Physicians’ Health Study,” New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 321: 129–135). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that aspirin has no effect on myocardial infarctions.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, does aspirin appear to be effective?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Overlap of Confidence Intervals In the article “On Judging the Significance of Differences by Examining the Overlap Between Confidence Intervals,” by Schenker and Gentleman (American Statistician, Vol. 55, No. 3), the authors consider sample data in this statement: “Independent simple random samples, each of size 200, have been drawn, and 112 people in the first sample have the attribute, whereas 88 people in the second sample have the attribute.”

a. Use the methods of this section to construct a 95% confidence interval estimate of the difference p1-p2. What does the result suggest about the equality of p1andp2?

b. Use the methods of Section 7-1 to construct individual 95% confidence interval estimates for each of the two population proportions. After comparing the overlap between the two confidence intervals, what do you conclude about the equality ofp1andp2?

c. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the two population proportions are equal. What do you conclude?

d. Based on the preceding results, what should you conclude about the equality ofp1andp2? Which of the three preceding methods is least effective in testing for the equality ofp1andp2?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Is Echinacea Effective for Colds? Rhinoviruses typically cause common colds. In a test of the effectiveness of Echinacea, 40 of the 45 subjects treated with Echinacea developed rhinovirus infections. In a placebo group, 88 of the 103 subjects developed rhinovirus infections (based on data from “An Evaluation of Echinacea Angustifolia in Experimental Rhinovirus Infections,” by Turner et al., New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 353, No. 4). We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that Echinacea has an effect on rhinovirus infections.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, does Echinacea appear to have any effect on the infection rate?

Magnet Treatment of Pain People spend around $5 billion annually for the purchase of magnets used to treat a wide variety of pains. Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, and the results given below are among the results obtained in the study (based on data from “Bipolar Permanent Magnets for the Treatment of Chronic Lower Back Pain: A Pilot Study,” by Collacott, Zimmerman, White, and Rindone, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 283, No. 10). Higher scores correspond to greater pain levels.

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment (similar to a placebo).

b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Does it appear that magnets are effective in treating back pain? Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger?

Reduction in Pain Level after Magnet Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.49, s = 0.96

Reduction in Pain Level after Sham Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.44, s = 1.4

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Cardiac Arrest at Day and Night A study investigated survival rates for in hospital patients who suffered cardiac arrest. Among 58,593 patients who had cardiac arrest during the day, 11,604 survived and were discharged. Among 28,155 patients who suffered cardiac arrest at night, 4139 survived and were discharged (based on data from “Survival from In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During Nights and Weekends,” by Puberty et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 299, No. 7). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the survival rates are the same for day and night.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, does it appear that for in-hospital patients who suffer cardiac arrest, the survival rate is the same for day and night?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free