Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Levene-Brown-Forsythe Test Repeat Exercise 16 “Blanking Out on Tests” using the Levene-Brown-Forsythe test.

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the two populations of scores have the same amount of variation.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Two samples are considered.

One sample represents anxiety scores due to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult in the test paper with a sample size equal to 25, and the other represents anxiety scores due to the arrangement of questions from difficult to easy in the test paper with a sample size equal to 16.

It is claimed that the variation in the scores corresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult is different from the variation in the scores corresponding to the arrangement of questions from difficult to easy.

The claim is to be tested using the Levene-Brown-Forsythe test.

02

Transform the sample values

Transformed sample 1:

Sort the samples in ascending order in the table shown below and obtain the median.

7.1

16.32

20.6

21.06

21.13

21.96

24.23

24.64

25.49

26.43

26.69

27.85

28.02

28.71

28.89

28.9

30.02

30.29

30.72

31.73

32.83

32.86

33.31

38.81

39.29






Since the number of observations in this sample is odd (25), the following formula is used to compute the median:

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{Median}} = {\left( {\frac{{{n_1} + 1}}{2}} \right)^{th}}obs\\ = {\left( {\frac{{25 + 1}}{2}} \right)^{th}}obs\\ = {13^{th}}obs\\ = 28.02\end{array}\)

Now subtract the median from each sample value and take the absolute value of the difference.

The following table shows the absolute deviations:

Sample values (x)

\(\left( {x - {\rm{median}}} \right)\)

\(\left| {x - {\rm{median}}} \right|\)

24.64

-3.38

3.38

33.31

5.29

5.29

26.43

-1.59

1.59

28.89

0.87

0.87

25.49

-2.53

2.53

39.29

11.27

11.27

20.6

-7.42

7.42

24.23

-3.79

3.79

28.71

0.69

0.69

38.81

10.79

10.79

16.32

-11.7

11.7

21.13

-6.89

6.89

7.1

-20.92

20.92

31.73

3.71

3.71

27.85

-0.17

0.17

32.83

4.81

4.81

26.69

-1.33

1.33

32.86

4.84

4.84

30.02

2

2

30.29

2.27

2.27

28.02

0

0

28.9

0.88

0.88

21.06

-6.96

6.96

21.96

-6.06

6.06

30.72

2.7

2.7

Transformed sample 2:

Sort the samples in ascending order in the table shown below and obtain the median.

26.63

26.68

27.24

27.62

29.34

29.49

30.2

30.26

32.34

32.54

33.53

33.62

34.02

35.32

35.91

42.91





Since the number of observations in this sample is even (16), the following formula is used to compute the median:

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{Media}}{{\rm{n}}_2} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{{n_2}}}{2}} \right)}^{th}}obs + {{\left( {\frac{{{n_2}}}{2} + 1} \right)}^{th}}obs}}{2}\\ = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{16}}{2}} \right)}^{th}}obs + {{\left( {\frac{{16}}{2} + 1} \right)}^{th}}obs}}{2}\\ = \frac{{{8^{th}}obs + {9^{th}}obs}}{2}\\ = \frac{{30.26 + 32.34}}{2}\\ = 31.3\end{array}\)

Now subtract the median from each sample value and take the absolute value of the difference.

The following table shows the absolute deviations:

Sample values (x)

\(\left( {x - {\rm{median}}} \right)\)

\(\left| {x - {\rm{median}}} \right|\)

33.62

2.32

2.32

35.91

4.61

4.61

27.24

-4.06

4.06

27.62

-3.68

3.68

34.02

2.72

2.72

26.68

-4.62

4.62

32.34

1.04

1.04

42.91

11.61

11.61

26.63

-4.67

4.67

29.49

-1.81

1.81

29.34

-1.96

1.96

30.2

-1.1

1.1

30.26

-1.04

1.04

35.32

4.02

4.02

33.53

2.23

2.23

32.54

1.24

1.24

03

Hypotheses

Let\({\mu _1}\)and\({\mu _2}\)be the population’smean of the transformed sample values corresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult and easy to difficult, respectively.

Null Hypothesis: The population’s mean of the transformed sample values corresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult is equal to the population’s mean of the transformed sample values corresponding to the arrangement of questions from difficult to easy.

Symbolically,

\({H_0}:{\mu _1} = {\mu _2}\)

Alternate Hypothesis: The population’s mean of the transformed sample values corresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult is not equal to the population mean of the transformed sample values corresponding to the arrangement of questions from difficult to easy.

Symbolically,

\({H_0}:{\mu _1} \ne {\mu _2}\)

04

Compute the sample means and sample variances of both the transformed samples

Transformed sample 1:

Let the transformed sample values corresponding to the arrangement of question from easy to difficult is denoted by x.

The sample mean is computed as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\bar x}_1} = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_1}} {{x_i}} }}{{{n_1}}}\\ = \frac{{3.38 + 5.29 + ..... + 2.7}}{{25}}\\ = 4.914\end{array}\)

The sample variance is computed as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}s_1^2 = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_1}} {{{({x_i} - \bar x)}^2}} }}{{{n_1} - 1}}\\ = \frac{{{{\left( {3.38 - 4.914} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {5.29 - 4.914} \right)}^2} + ...... + {{\left( {2.7 - 4.914} \right)}^2}}}{{25 - 1}}\\ = 4.766\end{array}\)

Transformed sample 2:

Let the transformed sample values corresponding to the arrangement of question from difficult to easy is denoted by x.

The sample mean is computed as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\bar x}_2} = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_2}} {{x_i}} }}{{{n_2}}}\\ = \frac{{2.32 + 4.61 + ..... + 1.24}}{{16}}\\ = 3.296\end{array}\)

The sample variance is computed as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}s_2^2 = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_2}} {{{({x_i} - {{\bar x}_2})}^2}} }}{{{n_2} - 1}}\\ = \frac{{{{\left( {2.32 - 3.296} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {4.61 - 3.296} \right)}^2} + ...... + {{\left( {1.24 - 3.296} \right)}^2}}}{{16 - 1}}\\ = 6.759\end{array}\)

05

Compute the test statistic

Apply the t-test to compute the test statistic using the given formula.

\(t = \frac{{\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }}\).

Substitute the respective values in the above formula and simplify.

\(\begin{array}{c}t = \frac{{\left( {4.914 - 3.296} \right) - 0}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{22.89}}{{25}} + \frac{{6.759}}{{16}}} }}\\ = 1.403\end{array}\)

Thus, t is equal to 1.403.

06

State the critical values and the p-value

The degrees of freedom is the smaller of the two values:\(\left( {{n_1} - 1} \right)\)and\(\left( {{n_2} - 1} \right)\).

The values are computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}{n_1} - 1 = 25 - 1\\ = 24\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{c}{n_2} - 1 = 16 - 1\\ = 15\end{array}\)

Thus, the degree of freedom is equal to 15.

The critical values can be obtained using the t distribution table with the degree of freedom equal to 15 and the significance level equal to 0.05 for a two-tailed test.

The critical values are -2.1314 and 2.1314.

The p-value for t equal to 1.403 is equal to 0.1810.

07

Interpretation

Since the test statistic value lies between the two values, the null hypothesis fails to be rejected.

Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the variance in the case of easy to difficult question arrangement is different from the variation in the case of difficult to easy question arrangement.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Ground vs. Helicopter for Serious Injuries A study investigated rates of fatalities among patients with serious traumatic injuries. Among 61,909 patients transported by helicopter, 7813 died. Among 161,566 patients transported by ground services, 17,775 died (based on data from “Association Between Helicopter vs Ground Emergency Medical Services and Survival for Adults With Major Trauma,” by Galvagno et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 307, No. 15). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the rate of fatalities is higher for patients transported by helicopter.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Considering the test results and the actual sample rates, is one mode of transportation better than the other? Are there other important factors to consider?

Are Flights Cheaper When Scheduled Earlier? Listed below are the costs (in dollars) of flights from New York (JFK) to Los Angeles (LAX). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that flights scheduled one day in advance cost more than flights scheduled 30 days in advance. What strategy appears to be effective in saving money when flying?

Delta

Jet Blue

American

Virgin

Alaska

United

1 day in advance

501

634

633

646

633

642

30 days in advance

148

149

156

156

252

313

In Exercises 5–20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with “Table” answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\).)

IQ and Lead Exposure Data Set 7 “IQ and Lead” in Appendix B lists full IQ scores for a random sample of subjects with low lead levels in their blood and another random sample of subjects with high lead levels in their blood. The statistics are summarized below.

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the mean IQ score of people with low blood lead levels is higher than the mean IQ score of people with high blood lead levels.

b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Does exposure to lead appear to have an effect on IQ scores?

Low Blood Lead Level: n = 78, \(\bar x\) = 92.88462, s = 15.34451

High Blood Lead Level: n = 21,\(\bar x\)= 86.90476, s = 8.988352

Does Aspirin Prevent Heart Disease? In a trial designed to test the effectiveness of aspirin in preventing heart disease, 11,037 male physicians were treated with aspirin and 11,034 male physicians were given placebos. Among the subjects in the aspirin treatment group, 139 experienced myocardial infarctions (heart attacks). Among the subjects given placebos, 239 experienced myocardial infarctions (based on data from “Final Report on the Aspirin Component of the Ongoing Physicians’ Health Study,” New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 321: 129–135). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that aspirin has no effect on myocardial infarctions.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, does aspirin appear to be effective?

Family Heights. In Exercises 1–5, use the following heights (in.) The data are matched so that each column consists of heights from the same family.

Father

68.0

68.0

65.5

66.0

67.5

70.0

68.0

71.0

Mother

64.0

60.0

63.0

59.0

62.0

69.0

65.5

66.0

Son

71.0

64.0

71.0

68.0

70.0

71.0

71.7

71.0

Scatterplot Construct a scatterplot of the father/son heights, then interpret it.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free