Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Count Five Test for Comparing Variation in Two Populations Repeat Exercise 16 “Blanking Out on Tests,” but instead of using the F test, use the following procedure for the “count five” test of equal variations (which is not as complicated as it might appear).

a. For each value x in the first sample, find the absolute deviation \(\left| {x - \bar x} \right|\) , then sort the absolute deviation values. Do the same for the second sample.

b. Let \({c_1}\)be the count of the number of absolute deviation values in the first sample that is greater than the largest absolute deviation value in the second sample. Also, let \({c_2}\)be the count of the number of absolute deviation values in the second sample that are greater than the largest absolute deviation value in the first sample. (One of these counts will always be zero.)

c. If the sample sizes are equal (\({n_1} = {n_2}\)), use a critical value of 5. If\({n_1} \ne {n_2}\), calculate the critical value shown below.

\(\frac{{\log \left( {\frac{\alpha }{2}} \right)}}{{\log \left( {\frac{{{n_1}}}{{{n_1} + {n_2}}}} \right)}}\)

d. If \({c_1} \ge \) critical value, then conclude that \(\sigma _1^2 > \sigma _2^2\). If \({c_2} \ge \)critical value, then conclude that \(\sigma _2^2 > \sigma _1^2\). Otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis of \(\sigma _1^2 = \sigma _2^2\).

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the two populations of scores have different amounts of variation.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Two samples are considered.

One sample represents anxiety scores due to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult in the test paper with a sample size equal to 25, and the other represents anxiety scores due to the arrangement of questions from difficult to easy in the test paper with a sample size equal to 16.

It is claimed that the variation in the scores corresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult is different from the variation in the scores corresponding to the arrangement of questions from difficult to easy.

02

Hypotheses

Let\({\sigma _1}\)and\({\sigma _2}\)be the population standard deviationsof the scores corresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult and the arrangement from difficult to easy, respectively.

Null Hypothesis: The population standard deviation of the scores corresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult is equal to thepopulation standard deviation of the scores corresponding to the arrangement of questions from difficult to easy.

Symbolically,

\({H_0}:{\sigma _1} = {\sigma _2}\)

Alternate Hypothesis: The population standard deviation of the scores corresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficult is not equal to thepopulation standard deviation of the scores corresponding to the arrangement of questions from difficult to easy.

Symbolically,

\({H_1}:{\sigma _1} \ne {\sigma _2}\)

03

Compute the absolute deviations for both the samples

a.

The sample mean score corresponding to the arrangement of questions from easy to difficultis equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\bar x}_1} = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_1}} {{x_i}} }}{{{n_1}}}\\ = \frac{{24.64 + 39.29 + .... + 30.72}}{{25}}\\ = 27.12\end{array}\)

Subtract the sample values for the first sample for the sample mean. Take the absolute values of the deviations. Sort the absolute deviations in ascending order.

The following table shows the absolute deviations for the first sample:

x

\(\left( {x - {{\bar x}_1}} \right)\)

\(\left| {x - {{\bar x}_1}} \right|\)

24.64

-2.48

2.475

39.29

12.17

12.175

16.32

-10.80

10.795

32.83

5.71

5.715

28.02

0.90

0.905

33.31

6.19

6.195

20.6

-6.52

6.515

21.13

-5.99

5.985

26.69

-0.43

0.425

28.9

1.78

1.785

26.43

-0.69

0.685

24.23

-2.89

2.885

7.1

-20.02

20.015

32.86

5.74

5.745

21.06

-6.06

6.055

28.89

1.77

1.775

28.71

1.59

1.595

31.73

4.61

4.615

30.02

2.90

2.905

21.96

-5.16

5.155

25.49

-1.63

1.625

38.81

11.69

11.695

27.85

0.73

0.735

30.29

3.17

3.175

30.72

3.60

3.605

The sorted values of the absolute deviations are shown below:

0.425

0.685

0.735

0.905

1.595

1.625

1.775

1.785

2.475

2.885

2.905

3.175

3.605

4.615

5.155

5.715

5.745

5.985

6.055

6.195

6.515

10.795

11.695

12.175

20.015






The mean score corresponding to the arrangement of questions from difficult to easy is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\bar x}_2} = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_2}} {{x_i}} }}{{{n_2}}}\\ = \frac{{33.62 + 34.02 + .... + 32.54}}{{16}}\\ = 31.73\end{array}\)

Subtract the sample values for the second sample for the sample mean. Take the absolute values of the deviations. Sort the absolute deviations in ascending order.

The following table shows the absolute deviations for the second sample:

x

\(\left( {x - {{\bar x}_2}} \right)\)

\(\left| {x - {{\bar x}_2}} \right|\)

33.62

1.89

1.892

34.02

2.29

2.292

26.63

-5.10

5.098

30.26

-1.47

1.468

35.91

4.18

4.182

26.68

-5.05

5.048

29.49

-2.24

2.238

35.32

3.59

3.592

27.24

-4.49

4.488

32.34

0.61

0.612

29.34

-2.39

2.388

33.53

1.80

1.802

27.62

-4.11

4.108

42.91

11.18

11.182

30.2

-1.53

1.528

32.54

0.81

0.812

The sorted values of the absolute deviations are shown below:

0.612

0.812

1.468

1.528

1.802

1.892

2.238

2.292

2.388

3.592

4.108

4.182

4.488

5.048

5.098

11.182





04

Values of \({c_1}\)and\({c_2}\)

b.

The largest absolute value in the second sample is 11.182. Thus, theabsolute deviations in the first sample that are greater than 11.182 are 11.695, 12.175, and 20.015.

Therefore,\({c_1} = 3\)

The largest absolute value in the first sample is 20.015. Thus, none of the absolute deviations in the second sample are greater than 20.015.

Therefore, \({c_2} = 0\)

05

State the critical value

c.

The value of\({n_1}\)is equal to 25, and the value of\({n_2}\)is equal to 16.

Since\({n_1} \ne {n_2}\), the critical value is given by the formula mentioned below:

\({\rm{Critical}}\;V{\rm{alue}} = \frac{{\log \left( {\frac{\alpha }{2}} \right)}}{{\log \left( {\frac{{{n_1}}}{{{n_1} + {n_2}}}} \right)}}\)

Substitute\(\alpha = 0.05\),\({n_1} = 25\)and\({n_2} = 16\)in the above formula and simplify to compute the required value as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{Critical}}\;V{\rm{alue}} = \frac{{\log \left( {\frac{\alpha }{2}} \right)}}{{\log \left( {\frac{{{n_1}}}{{{n_1} + {n_2}}}} \right)}}\\ = \frac{{\log \left( {\frac{{0.05}}{2}} \right)}}{{\log \left( {\frac{{25}}{{25 + 16}}} \right)}}\\ = 7.4569\end{array}\)

06

Resultbased on the given condition

d.

  • If the value of\({c_1}\)is greater than the critical value, the conclusion of\(\sigma _1^2 > \sigma _2^2\)is made.
  • If the value of\({c_2}\)is greater than the critical value, the conclusion of\(\sigma _2^2 > \sigma _1^2\)is made.
  • If neither of the above conditions satisfy, the null hypothesis is failed to reject.

Here,

\(\begin{array}{c}{c_1} = 3 < 7.4568\\{c_2} = 0 < 7.4568\end{array}\)

Thus, the critical value is greaterthan both \({c_1}\)and\({c_2}\). This implies that the null hypothesis is failed to reject.

07

Conclusion

Thus, there is not enough evidence to supportthe claimthat the two populations of scores have different amounts of variation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Denomination Effect A trial was conducted with 75 women in China given a 100-yuan bill, while another 75 women in China were given 100 yuan in the form of smaller bills (a 50-yuan bill plus two 20-yuan bills plus two 5-yuan bills). Among those given the single bill, 60 spent some or all of the money. Among those given the smaller bills, 68 spent some or all of the money (based on data from “The Denomination Effect,” by Raghubir and Srivastava, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 36). We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that when given a single large bill, a smaller proportion of women in China spend some or all of the money when compared to the proportion of women in China given the same amount in smaller bills.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. If the significance level is changed to 0.01, does the conclusion change?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Bednets to Reduce Malaria In a randomized controlled trial in Kenya, insecticide-treated bednets were tested as a way to reduce malaria. Among 343 infants using bednets, 15 developed malaria. Among 294 infants not using bednets, 27 developed malaria (based on data from “Sustainability of Reductions in Malaria Transmission and Infant Mortality in Western Kenya with Use of Insecticide-Treated Bednets,” by Lindblade et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 291, No. 21). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the incidence of malaria is lower for infants using bednets.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, do the bednets appear to be effective?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Overlap of Confidence Intervals In the article “On Judging the Significance of Differences by Examining the Overlap Between Confidence Intervals,” by Schenker and Gentleman (American Statistician, Vol. 55, No. 3), the authors consider sample data in this statement: “Independent simple random samples, each of size 200, have been drawn, and 112 people in the first sample have the attribute, whereas 88 people in the second sample have the attribute.”

a. Use the methods of this section to construct a 95% confidence interval estimate of the difference p1-p2. What does the result suggest about the equality of p1andp2?

b. Use the methods of Section 7-1 to construct individual 95% confidence interval estimates for each of the two population proportions. After comparing the overlap between the two confidence intervals, what do you conclude about the equality ofp1andp2?

c. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the two population proportions are equal. What do you conclude?

d. Based on the preceding results, what should you conclude about the equality ofp1andp2? Which of the three preceding methods is least effective in testing for the equality ofp1andp2?

Heights Use a 0.01 significance level with the sample data from Exercise 3 to test the claim that women have heights with a mean that is less than the mean height of men.

In Exercises 5–20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with “Table” answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of n1−1 and n2−1.)Color and Cognition Researchers from the University of British Columbia conducted a study to investigate the effects of color on cognitive tasks. Words were displayed on a computer screen with background colors of red and blue. Results from scores on a test of word recall are given below. Higher scores correspond to greater word recall.

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the samples are from populations with the same mean.

b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a). What is it about the confidence interval that causes us to reach the same conclusion from part (a)?

c. Does the background color appear to have an effect on word recall scores? If so, which color appears to be associated with higher word memory recall scores?

Red Background n = 35, x = 15.89, s = 5.90

Blue Background n = 36, x = 12.31, s = 5.48

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free