Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In Exercises 5–16, use the listed paired sample data, and assume that the samples are simple random samples and that the differences have a distribution that is approximately normal.

Hypnotism for Reducing Pain A study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of hypnotism in reducing pain. Results for randomly selected subjects are given in the accompanying table (based on “An Analysis of Factors That Contribute to the Efficacy of Hypnotic Analgesia,” by Price and Barber, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Vol. 96, No. 1). The values are before and after hypnosis; the measurements are in centimeters on a pain scale. Higher values correspond to greater levels of pain. Construct a 95% confidence interval for the mean of the “before/after” differences. Does hypnotism appear to be effective in reducing pain?

Subject

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

Before

6.6

6.5

9

10.3

11.3

8.1

6.3

11.6

After

6.8

2.4

7.4

8.5

8.1

6.1

3.4

2

Short Answer

Expert verified

The 95% confidence interval for the mean of the differences between the pain measurements before hypnosis and after hypnosis is equal to (0.69 cm,5.56 cm).

It seems that there are only positive values in the interval, and the value of 0 does not lie in the interval.

Therefore, theeffect of hypnotism is significant in reducing pain.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The given data is based on the use of hypnotism for pain reduction. The measurements are in centimetreson a pain scale. The measurements are obtained before hypnosis and after hypnosis.

02

Hypothesis for problem

Null Hypothesis: The mean of the differences between the pain measurements before and after hypnosis is equal to 0.

\({H_{0\;}}:\;{\mu _d} = 0\)

Alternative Hypothesis:The mean of the differences between the pain measurements before and after hypnosis is greater than 0.\({H_1}\;:{\mu _d} > 0\;\..

03

Expression of the confidence interval

The formula of the confidence interval is as follows:

\({\rm{C}}{\rm{.I}} = \bar d - E < {\mu _d} < \bar d + E\;\)

The value of the margin of error (E) has the following notation:

\(E = {t_{\frac{\alpha }{2},df}} \times \frac{{{s_d}}}{{\sqrt n }}\)

04

Table of the differences

The following table shows the difference in the pain measurements before and after hypnosis:

Subject

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

Before

6.6

6.5

9

10.3

11.3

8.1

6.3

11.6

After

6.8

2.4

7.4

8.5

8.1

6.1

3.4

2

Differences (d)

-0.2

4.1

1.6

1.8

3.2

2

2.9

9.6

05

Find the mean of the differences

Now, the mean of the differences between the two pain measurements is computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar d = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{d_i}} }}{n}\\ = \frac{{\left( { - 0.2} \right) + 4.1 + \cdots + 9.6}}{8}\\ = 3.125\end{array}\)

06

Find the standard deviation of the differences

The standard deviation of the differences is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}s = \sqrt {\frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{{\left( {{d_i} - \bar d} \right)}^2}} }}{{n - 1}}} \;\\ = \sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( { - 0.2 - 3.125} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {4.1 - 3.125} \right)}^2} + \cdots + {{\left( {9.6 - 3.125} \right)}^2}}}{{8 - 1}}} \\ = 2.911\end{array}\)

07

Find the critical value

The value of the degrees of freedom is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{df}} = n - 1\\ = 8 - 1\\ = 7\end{array}\)

The confidence level is equal to 95%. Thus, the level of significance becomes 0.05.

Therefore,

\(\begin{array}{c}\frac{\alpha }{2} = \frac{{0.05}}{2}\\ = 0.025\end{array}\)

Referring to the t-distribution table, the critical value of t for 7 degrees of freedom at 0.025 significance level is equal to 2.3646.

08

Compute the margin of error

The value of the margin of error is computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}E = {t_{\frac{\alpha }{2},df}} \times \frac{{{s_d}}}{{\sqrt n }}\\ = {t_{\frac{{0.05}}{2},7}} \times \frac{{2.911}}{{\sqrt 8 }}\\ = 2.3646 \times \frac{{2.911}}{{\sqrt 8 }}\\ = 2.433992\end{array}\)

09

Step 9:Computethe confidence interval

The value of the confidence interval is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar d - E < {\mu _d} < \bar d + E\;\\\left( {3.125 - 2.433992} \right) < {\mu _d} < \left( {3.125 + 2.433992} \right)\\0.69 < {\mu _d} < 5.56\end{array}\)

Thus, the 95% confidence interval is equal to (0.69 cm,5.56 cm).

10

Interpretation of the confidence interval

It can be seen that the value of 0 is not included in the interval, and all the values are positive.

This implies that the mean of the differences between the pain measurements cannot be equal to 0.

And, the pain measurement after hypnosis is less than the pain measurement before hypnosis.

Thus, there is enough evidence to conclude that hypnotism appears to be effective in reducing pain.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Overlap of Confidence Intervals In the article “On Judging the Significance of Differences by Examining the Overlap Between Confidence Intervals,” by Schenker and Gentleman (American Statistician, Vol. 55, No. 3), the authors consider sample data in this statement: “Independent simple random samples, each of size 200, have been drawn, and 112 people in the first sample have the attribute, whereas 88 people in the second sample have the attribute.”

a. Use the methods of this section to construct a 95% confidence interval estimate of the difference\({p_1} - {p_2}\). What does the result suggest about the equality of \({p_1}\) and \({p_2}\)?

b. Use the methods of Section 7-1 to construct individual 95% confidence interval estimates for each of the two population proportions. After comparing the overlap between the two confidence intervals, what do you conclude about the equality of \({p_1}\) and \({p_2}\)?

c. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the two population proportions are equal. What do you conclude?

d. Based on the preceding results, what should you conclude about the equality of \({p_1}\) and \({p_2}\)? Which of the three preceding methods is least effective in testing for the equality of \({p_1}\) and \({p_2}\)?

In Exercises 5–20, assume that the two samples are independent random samples selected from normally distributed populations. Do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with “Table” answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of n1−1 and n2−1).

Are male and female professors rated differently? According to Data Set 17 “Course Evaluations” Appendix B, given below are student evaluation scores of female professors and male professors. The test claims that female and male professors have the same mean evaluation ratings. Does there appear to be a difference?

Females

4.4

3.4

4.8

2.9

4.4

4.9

3.5

3.7

3.4

4.8

Males

4.0

3.6

4.1

4.1

3.5

4.6

4.0

4.3

4.5

4.3

In Exercises 5–20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with “Table” answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\).) Car and Taxi Ages When the author visited Dublin, Ireland (home of Guinness Brewery employee William Gosset, who first developed the t distribution), he recorded the ages of randomly selected passenger cars and randomly selected taxis. The ages can be found from the license plates. (There is no end to the fun of traveling with the author.) The ages (in years) are listed below. We might expect that taxis would be newer, so test the claim that the mean age of cars is greater than the mean age of taxis.

Car

Ages

4

0

8

11

14

3

4

4

3

5

8

3

3

7

4

6

6

1

8

2

15

11

4

1

1

8

Taxi Ages

8

8

0

3

8

4

3

3

6

11

7

7

6

9

5

10

8

4

3

4

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Denomination Effect A trial was conducted with 75 women in China given a 100-yuan bill, while another 75 women in China were given 100 yuan in the form of smaller bills (a 50-yuan bill plus two 20-yuan bills plus two 5-yuan bills). Among those given the single bill, 60 spent some or all of the money. Among those given the smaller bills, 68 spent some or all of the money (based on data from “The Denomination Effect,” by Raghubir and Srivastava, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 36). We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that when given a single large bill, a smaller proportion of women in China spend some or all of the money when compared to the proportion of women in China given the same amount in smaller bills.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. If the significance level is changed to 0.01, does the conclusion change?

Verifying requirements in the largest clinical trial ever conducted, 401,974 children were randomly assigned to two groups. The treatment group considered of 201,229 children given the sulk vaccine for polio, and 33 of those children developed polio. The other 200,745 children were given a placebo, and 115 of those children developed polio. If we want to use the methods of this section to test the claim that the rate of polio is less for children given the sulk vaccine, are the requirements for a hypothesis test satisfied? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free