Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In Exercises 5–16, test the given claim.

Professor Evaluation Scores Listed below are student evaluation scores of female professorsand male professors from Data Set 17 “Course Evaluations” in Appendix B. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that female professors and male professors have evaluation scores with the same variation.

Female

4.4

3.4

4.8

2.9

4.4

4.9

3.5

3.7

3.4

4.8

Male

4

3.6

4.1

4.1

3.5

4.6

4

4.3

4.5

4.3

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is enough evidence to reject the claim that female professors and male professors have evaluation scores with the same variation.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Two samples are taken showing the student evaluation scores where one represents scores by female professors,and the other represents scores by male professors

It is claimed that the variationinthe scores by female professors is equal to the variation in the scores by male professors.

02

Hypotheses

Let\({\sigma _1}\)and\({\sigma _2}\)be the population standard deviationsof the scores by female professors and the scores by male professors, respectively.

Null Hypothesis:The population standard deviation of the scores by female professors is equal to the population standard deviation of scores by male professors.

Symbolically,

\({H_0}:{\sigma _1} = {\sigma _2}\)

Alternate Hypothesis: The population standard deviation of the scores by female professors is equal to the population standard deviation of scores by male professors.

Symbolically,

\({H_1}:{\sigma _1} \ne {\sigma _2}\)

03

Sample mean, sample size and sample variances

The sample variance has the following formula:

\({s^2} = \frac{1}{{n - 1}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{{\left( {x - \bar x} \right)}^2}} \)

The sample mean score by female professors is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\bar x}_1} = \frac{{4.4 + 3.4 + ....... + 4.8}}{{10}}\\ = 4.02\end{array}\)

The sample variance of the scores by female professors is computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}s_{female}^2 = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_1}} {{{({x_i} - {{\bar x}_1})}^2}} }}{{{n_1} - 1}}\\ = \frac{{{{\left( {4.4 - 4.02} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {3.4 - 4.02} \right)}^2} + ....... + {{\left( {4.88 - 4.02} \right)}^2}}}{{10 - 1}}\\ = 0.52\end{array}\)

Thus, the sample variance of the scores by female professors is equal to 0.52.

The sample mean score by male professors is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\bar x}_2} = \frac{{4 + 3.6 + ....... + 4.3}}{{10}}\\ = 4.1\end{array}\)

The sample variance of the scores by male professors is computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}s_{male}^2 = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_2}} {{{({x_i} - {{\bar x}_2})}^2}} }}{{{n_2} - 1}}\\ = \frac{{{{\left( {4 - 4.1} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {3.4 - 4.1} \right)}^2} + ....... + {{\left( {4.3 - 4.1} \right)}^2}}}{{10 - 1}}\\ = 0.12\end{array}\)

Thus, the sample variance of the scores by male professors is equal to 0.12.

04

Compute the test statistic

Since two independent samples involve a claim about the population standard deviation, apply an F-test.

Consider the larger sample variance to be\(s_1^2\)and the corresponding sample size to be\({n_1}\).

Here,\(s_1^2\)is the sample variance corresponding to female professors and has a value equal to 0.52.

\(s_2^2\)is the sample variance corresponding to male professors and has a value equal to 0.12.

Substitute the respective values to calculate the F statistic:

\(\begin{array}{c}F = \frac{{s_1^2}}{{s_2^2}}\\ = \frac{{0.52}}{{0.12}}\\ = 4.175\end{array}\)

05

State the critical value and the p-value

The value of the numerator degrees of freedom is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}{n_1} - 1 = 10 - 1\\ = 9\end{array}\)

The value of the denominator degrees of freedom is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}{n_2} - 1 = 10 - 1\\ = 9\end{array}\)

For the F test, the critical value corresponding to the right-tail is considered.

The critical value can be obtained using the F-distribution table with numerator degrees of freedom equal to 9and denominator degrees of freedom equal to 9 for a right-tailed test.

The level of significance is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}\frac{\alpha }{2} = \frac{{0.05}}{2}\\ = 0.025\end{array}\)

Thus, the critical value is equal to 4.026.

The two-tailed p-value for F equal to 4.175 is equal to 0.0447.

06

Conclusion

Since the test statistic value is greaterthan the critical value and the p-value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.

Thus, there is enough evidence to rejectthe claimthat female professors and male professors have evaluation scores with the same variation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim

Question:Headache Treatment In a study of treatments for very painful “cluster” headaches, 150 patients were treated with oxygen and 148 other patients were given a placebo consisting of ordinary air. Among the 150 patients in the oxygen treatment group, 116 were free from head- aches 15 minutes after treatment. Among the 148 patients given the placebo, 29 were free from headaches 15 minutes after treatment (based on data from “High-Flow Oxygen for Treatment of Cluster Headache,” by Cohen, Burns, and Goads by, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 302, No. 22). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the oxygen treatment is effective.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, is the oxygen treatment effective?

Assessing Normality Interpret the normal quantile plot of heights of fathers.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Ground vs. Helicopter for Serious Injuries A study investigated rates of fatalities among patients with serious traumatic injuries. Among 61,909 patients transported by helicopter, 7813 died. Among 161,566 patients transported by ground services, 17,775 died (based on data from “Association Between Helicopter vs Ground Emergency Medical Services and Survival for Adults With Major Trauma,” by Galvagno et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 307, No. 15). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the rate of fatalities is higher for patients transported by helicopter.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Considering the test results and the actual sample rates, is one mode of transportation better than the other? Are there other important factors to consider?

Family Heights. In Exercises 1–5, use the following heights (in.) The data are matched so that each column consists of heights from the same family.

Father

68.0

68.0

65.5

66.0

67.5

70.0

68.0

71.0

Mother

64.0

60.0

63.0

59.0

62.0

69.0

65.5

66.0

Son

71.0

64.0

71.0

68.0

70.0

71.0

71.7

71.0

Scatterplot Construct a scatterplot of the father/son heights, then interpret it.

Family Heights. In Exercises 1–5, use the following heights (in.) The data are matched so that each column consists of heights from the same family.

Father

68.0

68.0

65.5

66.0

67.5

70.0

68.0

71.0

Mother

64.0

60.0

63.0

59.0

62.0

69.0

65.5

66.0

Son

71.0

64.0

71.0

68.0

70.0

71.0

71.7

71.0

Confidence Interval Construct a 95% confidence interval estimate of the mean height of sons. Write a brief statement that interprets the confidence interval.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free