Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Clinical Trials of OxyContin OxyContin (oxycodone) is a drug used to treat pain, butit is well known for its addictiveness and danger. In a clinical trial, among subjects treatedwith OxyContin, 52 developed nausea and 175 did not develop nausea. Among other subjectsgiven placebos, 5 developed nausea and 40 did not develop nausea (based on data from PurduePharma L.P.). Use a 0.05 significance level to test for a difference between the rates of nauseafor those treated with OxyContin and those given a placebo.

a. Use a hypothesis test.

b. Use an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Does nausea appear to be an adverse reaction resulting from OxyContin?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a.There is not sufficient evidence to concludethat there is a significant difference between the rates of nausea for subjects who were treated with OxyContin and subjects who were given a placebo.

b.The 95% confidence interval is equal to (0.011, 0.225), andsince 0 is not included in the interval, it is concluded that there is a difference between the rates of nausea for subjects treated with OxyContin and subjects given a placebo.

c.Nausea appears to be an adverse reaction resulting from OxyContin.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

In a clinical trial, 52 subjects developed nausea, and 175 did not develop nausea among the subjects who were treated with OxyContin.

Also, among the subjects who were given placebos, fivedeveloped nausea, and 40 did not develop nausea.

02

Describe the hypothesis to be tested.

Null hypothesis:There is no difference between the rates of nausea for subjectswho were treated with OxyContin and subjectswho were given a placebo.

\({H_0}:{p_1} = {p_2}\)

Alternate hypothesis:There is a significant difference between the rates of nausea for subjectswho were treated with OxyContin and subjectswho were given a placebo.

\({\rm{ }}{H_1}:{p_1} \ne {p_2}\)

03

Calculate the sample statistics

Let\({n_1}\)and\({n_2}\)be the number ofsubjectstreated with OxyContin and the number of subjectsgiven a placebo, respectively.

The sample size\(\left( {{n_1}} \right)\)is computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}{n_1} = 52 + 175\\ = 227\end{array}\)

The sample size\(\left( {{n_2}} \right)\)is computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}{n_2} = 5 + 40\\ = 45\end{array}\)

Assume that\({x_1}\)and\({x_2}\)are the number ofsubjects who developed nausea and were given OxyContin and placebo, respectively.

Let \({\hat p_1}\)be the sample proportionof subjects who developed nausea and were treated with OxyContin.

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\hat p}_1} = \frac{{{x_1}}}{{{n_1}}}\\ = \frac{{52}}{{227}}\\ = 0.229\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\hat q}_1} = 1 - {{\hat p}_1}\\ = 1 - 0.229\\ = 0.771\end{array}\)

Let \({\hat p_2}\)be the sample proportion ofsubjects who developed nausea and were given a placebo.

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\hat p}_2} = \frac{{{x_2}}}{{{n_2}}}\\ = \frac{5}{{45}}\\ = 0.111\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\hat q}_2} = 1 - {{\hat p}_2}\\ = 1 - 0.111\\ = 0.889\end{array}\)

The value of the pooled sample proportion is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar p = \frac{{{x_1} + {x_2}}}{{{n_1} + {n_2}}}\\ = \frac{{52 + 5}}{{227 + 45}}\\ = 0.210\end{array}\)

Hence,

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar q = 1 - \bar p\\ = 1 - 0.210\\ = 0.790\end{array}\)

04

Compute the value of the test statistic

The test statistic is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}z = \frac{{\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - \left( {{p_1} - {p_2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{\bar p\bar q}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{\bar p\bar q}}{{{n_2}}}} }}\\ = \frac{{\left( {0.229 - 0.111} \right) - 0}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{\left( {0.210} \right)\left( {0.790} \right)}}{{227}} + \frac{{\left( {0.210} \right)\left( {0.790} \right)}}{{45}}} }}\\ = 1.776\end{array}\)

Referring to the standard normal distribution table, the critical values of z corresponding to\(\alpha = 0.05\)for a two-tailed test are -1.96 and 1.96.

Referring to the standard normal distribution table, the corresponding p-value is equal to 0.0757.

Here, the value of the test statistic lies between the two critical values, and the p-value is greater than 0.05.

Therefore, the null hypothesis is failed to reject.

05

Conclusion of the Test

a.

There is not sufficient evidence to concludethat there is a significant difference between the rates of nausea for subjectswho were treated with OxyContin and subjectswho were given a placebo.

06

Describe the confidence interval

If the level of significance for a two-tailed test is equal to 0.05, then the corresponding confidence level to construct the confidence interval is equal to 95%.

The expression for computing the confidence interval is given below:

\(\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - E < {p_1} - {p_2} < \left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) + E\)

07

Calculate the margin of error

E is the margin of error and has the following formula:

\(\begin{array}{c}E = {z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\sqrt {\frac{{{{\hat p}_1}{{\hat q}_1}}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{{{\hat p}_2}{{\hat q}_2}}}{{{n_2}}}} \\ = 1.96 \times \sqrt {\frac{{\left( {0.229} \right)\left( {0.771} \right)}}{{227}} + \frac{{\left( {0.111} \right)\left( {0.889} \right)}}{{45}}} \\ = 0.1069\end{array}\)

08

Construct the confidence interval

b.

Substituting the required values, the following confidence interval is obtained:

\(\begin{array}{c}\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - E < {p_1} - {p_2} < \left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) + E\\(0.229 - 0.111) - 0.1069 < {p_1} - {p_2} < (0.229 - 0.111) + 0.1069\\0.011 < {p_1} - {p_2} < 0.225\end{array}\)

Thus, the 95% confidence interval is equal to (0.011, 0.225).

This confidenceinterval does not contain zero,which means that there is a significant difference between the two proportions of subjects who developed nausea.

Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to conclude thatthere is a significant difference between the rates of nausea for subjects who were treated with OxyContin and subjects who were given a placebo.

09

Examining nausea as an adverse reaction

c.

The sample results show that 22.9% of the subjects who were treated with OxyContin developed nausea.

Since the proportion is high, it can be said that nausea is an adverse reaction of OxyContin.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Ground vs. Helicopter for Serious Injuries A study investigated rates of fatalities among patients with serious traumatic injuries. Among 61,909 patients transported by helicopter, 7813 died. Among 161,566 patients transported by ground services, 17,775 died (based on data from “Association Between Helicopter vs Ground Emergency Medical Services and Survival for Adults With Major Trauma,” by Galvagno et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 307, No. 15). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the rate of fatalities is higher for patients transported by helicopter.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Considering the test results and the actual sample rates, is one mode of transportation better than the other? Are there other important factors to consider?

esting Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Accuracy of Fast Food Drive-Through Orders In a study of Burger King drive-through orders, it was found that 264 orders were accurate and 54 were not accurate. For McDonald’s, 329 orders were found to be accurate while 33 orders were not accurate (based on data from QSR magazine). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that Burger King and McDonald’s have the same accuracy rates.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Relative to accuracy of orders, does either restaurant chain appear to be better?

Hypothesis and conclusions refer to the hypothesis test described in exercise 1.

a. Identify the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis

b. If the p-value for test is reported as “less than 0.001,” what should we conclude about the original claim?

Hypothesis Test Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that differences between heights of fathers and their sons have a mean of 0 in.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Dreaming in Black and White A study was conducted to determine the proportion of people who dream in black and white instead of color. Among 306 people over the age of 55, 68 dream in black and white, and among 298 people under the age of 25, 13 dream in black and white (based on data from “Do We Dream in Color?” by Eva Murzyn, Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 17, No. 4). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the proportion of people over 55 who dream in black and white is greater than the proportion of those under 25.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. An explanation given for the results is that those over the age of 55 grew up exposed to media that was mostly displayed in black and white. Can the results from parts (a) and (b) be used to verify that explanation?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free