Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Find and interpret 95 % confidence interval for the proportion of all US adults who never clothes-shop online.

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is 95%confidence interval for the proportion of all US adults who never clothes-shop online between 0.291 and 0.349.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

A total of 1000 adults in the U S were polled regarding their online vs. in-store clothing purchase habits.

32% of respondents never shop for garments online.

02

explanation

The one-proportion z-interval technique is appropriate because x and n are both 5 or more.

The confidence interval is 95 percent, which equals
α=0.05.

It discovers that zα/2=z0.05/2=1.96

For p, the confidence interval is of the type

pza/2p(1p)ntop+za/2p(1p)ni.e.0.321.9600.32(10.32)1000to0.321.9600.32(10.32)1000i.e.0.32±1.960(0.0148)0.32±0.0290(0.291,0.349)

As a result, the 95% confidence interval for the fraction of all US adults who never shop for garments online is (0.291,0.349).

interpretation:

The proportion of all US adults who never buy for garments online has a 95 percent confidence interval between 0.291 and 0.349.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A sample size that will ensure a margin of error of at most the one specified.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7–22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Tennis Challenges Since the Hawk-Eye instant replay system for tennis was introduced at the U.S. Open in 2006, men challenged 2441 referee calls, with the result that 1027 of the calls were overturned. Women challenged 1273 referee calls, and 509 of the calls were overturned. We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that men and women have equal success in challenging calls.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, does it appear that men and women have equal success in challenging calls?

A sample size that will ensure a margin of error of at most the one specified.

In Exercises 5–20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with “Table” answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\).)

Are Male Professors and Female Professors Rated Differently?

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that two samples of course evaluation scores are from populations with the same mean. Use these summary statistics: Female professors:

n = 40, \(\bar x\)= 3.79, s = 0.51; male professors: n = 53, \(\bar x\) = 4.01, s = 0.53. (Using the raw data in Data Set 17 “Course Evaluations” will yield different results.)

b. Using the summary statistics given in part (a), construct a 95% confidence interval estimate of the difference between the mean course evaluations score for female professors and male professors.

c. Example 1 used similar sample data with samples of size 12 and 15, and Example 1 led to the conclusion that there is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the null hypothesis.

Do the larger samples in this exercise affect the results much?

Using Confidence Intervals

a. Assume that we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that p1 < p2. Which is better: A hypothesis test or a confidence interval?

b. In general, when dealing with inferences for two population proportions, which two of the following are equivalent: confidence interval method; P-value method; critical value method?

c. If we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that p1 < p2, what confidence level should we use?

d. If we test the claim in part (c) using the sample data in Exercise 1, we get this confidence interval: -0.000508 < p1 - p2 < - 0.000309. What does this confidence interval suggest about the claim?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free