Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In Exercises 5–16, use the listed paired sample data, and assume that the samples are simple random samples and that the differences have a distribution that is approximately normal.

Heights of Fathers and Sons Listed below are heights (in.) of fathers and their first sons. The data are from a journal kept by Francis Galton. (See Data Set 5 “Family Heights”in Appendix B.) Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that there is no difference in heights between fathers and their first sons.

Height of Father

72

66

69

70

70

70

70

75

68.2

65

Height of Son

73

68

68

71

70

70

71

71

70

63

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the height of fathers and their first sons have no difference.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The heights of pairs of fathers and their first sons are recorded.

02

Hypotheses

It is claimed thatthere is no difference in heights between fathers and their first sons.

Corresponding to the given claim, the following hypotheses are set up:

Null Hypothesis: The mean of the differences between the height of fathers and their first sons is equal to 0.

\({H_0}:{\mu _d} = 0\)

Alternative Hypothesis: The mean of the differences between the height of fathers and their first sons is not equal to 0.

\({H_1}:{\mu _d} \ne 0\)

The test is two-tailed.

03

Differences in the values of each matched pair

The following table shows the differences in the heights of the fathers and sons for each matched pair:

Father

72

66

69

70

70

70

70

75

68.2

65

Son

73

68

68

71

70

70

71

71

70

63

Differences(d)

-1

-2

1

-1

0

0

-1

4

-1.8

2

04

Mean and sample standard deviation of the differences

The number of pairs (n) is equal to 10.

The mean value of the differences is computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar d = \frac{{\left( { - 1} \right) + \left( { - 2} \right) + \ldots + 2}}{{10}}\\ = 0.02\end{array}\)

The standard deviation of the differences is computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}{s_d} = \sqrt {\frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{{({d_i} - \bar d)}^2}} }}{{n - 1}}} \\ = \sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( {\left( { - 1} \right) - 0.02} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {\left( { - 2} \right) - 0.02} \right)}^2} + ..... + {{\left( {2 - 0.02} \right)}^2}}}{{10 - 1}}} \\ = 1.86\end{array}\)

The mean value of the differences for the population of matched pairs \(\left( {{\mu _d}} \right)\) is considered to be equal to 0.

05

Test statistic

The value of the test statistic is computed as shown:

\(\begin{array}{c}t = \frac{{\bar d - {\mu _d}}}{{\frac{{{s_d}}}{{\sqrt n }}}}\\ = \frac{{0.02 - 0}}{{\frac{{1.86}}{{\sqrt {10} }}}}\\ = 0.034\end{array}\)

The degrees of freedom are computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}df = n - 1\\ = 10 - 1\\ = 9\end{array}\)

Referring to the t-distribution table, the critical value of t at\(\alpha = 0.05\)and degrees of freedom equal to 9 for a two-tailed test are -2.2622 and 2.2622.

The right-tailed p-value of t equal to 0.034 is equal to 0.9729.

06

Conclusion

Since the p-value is greater than 0.05 and the test statistic lies between the two critical values, the null hypothesis is failed to reject.

There is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the height of fathers and their first sons have no difference.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Hypothesis and conclusions refer to the hypothesis test described in exercise 1.

a. Identify the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis

b. If the p-value for test is reported as “less than 0.001,” what should we conclude about the original claim?

A sample size that will ensure a margin of error of at most the one specified.

Before/After Treatment Results Captopril is a drug designed to lower systolic blood pressure. When subjects were treated with this drug, their systolic blood pressure readings (in mm Hg) were measured before and after the drug was taken. Results are given in the accompanying table (based on data from “Essential Hypertension: Effect of an Oral Inhibitor of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme,” by MacGregor et al., British Medical Journal, Vol. 2). Using a 0.01 significance level, is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that captopril is effective in lowering systolic blood pressure?

Subject

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

Before

200

174

198

170

179

182

193

209

185

155

169

210

After

191

170

177

167

159

151

176

183

159

145

146

177

A sample size that will ensure a margin of error of at most the one specified.

Degrees of Freedom

For Example 1 on page 431, we used df\( = \)smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\), we got\(df = 11\), and the corresponding critical values are\(t = \pm 2.201.\)If we calculate df using Formula 9-1, we get\(df = 19.063\), and the corresponding critical values are\( \pm 2.093\). How is using the critical values of\(t = \pm 2.201\)more “conservative” than using the critical values of\( \pm 2.093\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free