Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

BMI for Miss America. A claimed trend of thinner Miss America winners has generated charges that the contest encourages unhealthy diet habits among young women. Listed below are body mass indexes (BMI) for recent Miss America winners. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that recent winners are from a population with a mean BMI less than 20.16, which was the BMI for winners from the 1920s and 1930s. Given that BMI is a measure of the relative amounts of body fat and height, do recent winners appear to be significantly smaller than those from the 1920s and 1930s?

19.5 20.3 19.6 20.2 17.8 17.9 19.1 18.8 17.6 16.8.

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the BMI of the recent winners is significantly smaller than the models in the 1920s and 1930s at a 0.01 level of significance.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The claim states that the population mean BMI is less than\(20.16\), which was the BMI for the winners from the 1920s and 1930s.

The level of significance to test this claim is 0.01.

The sample size is \(n = 10\)with the observations of the recent winners.

02

State the hypotheses

The claim does not include the equality statement. Therefore, the claim of the problem becomes the alternate hypothesis.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_{0\;}}:\;\mu = 20.16\\{H_1}\;:\mu \; < 20.16\end{array}\)

Here, \(\mu \) is the population mean BMI of the recent winners of Miss America.

03

State the formula for the test statistic

Assume that the samples are randomly selected, and the population follows the normal distribution.

As the population standard deviation is unknown, the t-test applies.

The formula for the test statistic is given below.

\(t = \frac{{\bar x - \mu }}{{\frac{s}{{\sqrt n }}}}\)

Here,

\(\begin{array}{l}\bar x\;:\;{\rm{sample}}\;{\rm{mean}}\\s\;:\;{\rm{sample}}\;{\rm{stadard}}\;{\rm{deviation}}\\\mu \;:\;{\rm{population}}\;{\rm{mean}}\\n\;:{\rm{sample}}\;{\rm{size}}\end{array}\)

04

Find the sample mean and the sample standard deviation

The formula for the sample mean is as follows.

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar x\; = \;\frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{x_i}} }}{n}\;\\ = \frac{{187.6}}{{10}}\;\\ = 18.76\end{array}\).

The sample mean is\(\bar x = 18.76\).

The standard deviation of the sample is given as follows.

\(\begin{array}{c}s = \sqrt {\frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{{\left( {{x_i} - \bar x} \right)}^2}} }}{{n - 1}}} \;\\ = \sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( {19.5 - 18.76} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {20.3 - 18.76} \right)}^2} + ... + {{\left( {16.8 - 18.76} \right)}^2}}}{{10 - 1}}} \;\\ = \sqrt {\frac{{12.664}}{9}\;\;} \\ = 1.1862\end{array}\).

The sample standard deviation is \(s = 1.1862\).

05

Find the degree of freedom and the critical value

The degree of freedom is computed as follows.

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{df}} = n - 1\\ = 10 - 1\\ = 9\end{array}\).

For the one-tailed test , at a \(0.01\) level of significance, that is, \(\alpha = 0.01\) with \(9\)degrees of freedom, the critical value will be

\(\begin{array}{c}{t_{{\rm{crit}}}}\; = {t_{\alpha ,df}}\;\\ = {t_{0.01,9}}\;\\ = 2.821\;\end{array}\)

This critical value is observed from the t-table corresponding to row 9 and the level of significance 0.01 (one-tailed).

06

Compute the test statistic

Substitute all the computed values in the formula.

\(\begin{array}{c}t = \frac{{18.76 - 20.16}}{{\frac{{1.19}}{{\sqrt {10} }}}}\;\\ = \frac{{ - 1.4}}{{0.376}}\;\\ = - 3.723\end{array}\)

The test statistic is \(t = - 3.723\).

07

State the decision using the critical value

The test criteria for the critical value are given below.

If \(\left| t \right|\; > \;{t_{crit}}\), reject the null hypothesis at the given level of significance; otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Here,

\(\begin{array}{c}\left| t \right|\; = \left| { - 3.723} \right|\\ = 3.723\\ > 2.821\left( {{t_{crit}}} \right)\end{array}\)


Thus, the null hypothesis is rejected at the 0.01 level of significance.

08

Conclusion 

As the null hypothesis is rejected, it can be concluded that there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean body mass index of the recent Miss America is significantly smaller than those in the 1920s and 1930s, which is 20.16.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Identifying H0and H1. In Exercises 5โ€“8, do the following:

a. Express the original claim in symbolic form.

b. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses.

Cell Phone Claim: Fewer than 95% of adults have a cell phone. In a Marist poll of 1128 adults, 87% said that they have a cell phone.

Final Conclusions. In Exercises 25โ€“28, use a significance level of ฮฑ= 0.05 and use the given information for the following:

a. State a conclusion about the null hypothesis. (Reject H0 or fail to reject H0.)

b. Without using technical terms or symbols, state a final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Original claim: The mean pulse rate (in beats per minute) of adult males is 72 bpm. The hypothesis test results in a P-value of 0.0095.

Testing Hypotheses. In Exercises 13โ€“24, assume that a simple random sample has been selected and test the given claim. Unless specified by your instructor, use either the P-value method or the critical value method for testing hypotheses. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Is the Diet Practical? When 40 people used the Weight Watchers diet for one year, their mean weight loss was 3.0 lb and the standard deviation was 4.9 lb (based on data from โ€œComparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Reduction,โ€ by Dansinger et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 293, No. 1). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the mean weight loss is greater than 0. Based on these results, does the diet appear to have statistical significance? Does the diet appear to have practical significance?

Finding P-values. In Exercises 5โ€“8, either use technology to find the P-value or use Table A-3 to find a range of values for the P-value.

Airport Data Speeds: The claim that for Verizon data speeds at airports, the mean. The sample size is and the test statistic is

t =-1.625 .

Confidence interval Assume that we will use the sample data from Exercise 1 โ€œVideo Gamesโ€ with a 0.05 significance level in a test of the claim that the population mean is greater than 90 sec. If we want to construct a confidence interval to be used for testing the claim, what confidence level should be used for the confidence interval? If the confidence interval is found to be 21.1 sec < ฮผ< 191.4 sec, what should we conclude about the claim?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free