Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Exercise 8- 5. Perception and Reality In a presidential election, 308 out of 611 voters surveyed said that they voted for the candidate who won (based on data from ICR Survey Research Group). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that among all voters, the percentage who believe that they voted for the winning candidate is equal to 43%, which is the actual percentage of votes for the winning candidate. What does the result suggest about voter perceptions?

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that 43% of voters favored the candidate. This suggests that the voters did not reveal the true votes.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The summary of the results obtained from the survey is as follows.

Sample size n=611.

Votes in favor of winning candidate x=308.

Level of significance α=0.05.

It is claimed that the proportion of voters in favor of the winning candidate is 43% or 0.43.

02

State the hypotheses

Null hypothesis: The votes for the winning candidate are equal to 43%.

Alternative hypothesis: The votes for the winning candidate are not equal to 43%

Let p be the true proportion of voters who vote for the candidate who won.

Mathematically,

H0:p=0.43H1:p0.43

03

Compute the test statistic

In testing claims for the population proportion, the z-test is used.

The sample proportion is given as follows.

p^=308611=0.5041

From the given information,

p=0.43q=1-p=1-0.43=0.57

The test statistic is computed as follows.

z=p^-ppqn=0.5041-0.430.43×0.57611=3.70

04

Compute the critical value

From the standard normal table, the critical values for a two-tailed test with a 0.05 significance level are obtained as follows.

The left-tailed critical value will have an area of 0.025, corresponding to row -1.9 and column 0.06.

The right-tailed critical value will have an area of 0.975, corresponding to row 1.9 and column 0.06.

Thus, the two critical values are -1.96 and 1.96.

05

State the decision

If the test statistic lies between the critical values, the null hypothesis is failed to be rejected. Otherwise, the null hypothesis is rejected.

Here, 3.70 does not fall between the critical values -1.96 and 1.96.

Thus, the null hypothesis is rejected.

06

Conclusion

The result suggests that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the actual percentage of voters who favored the winning candidate is 43%.

Asthe proportion of voters in the survey is quite high, it suggests that the voters did not reveal the true votes in the survey.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Touch Therapy Repeat the preceding exercise using a 0.01 significance level. Does the conclusion change?

Testing Hypotheses. In Exercises 13–24, assume that a simple random sample has been selected and test the given claim. Unless specified by your instructor, use either the P-value method or the critical value method for testing hypotheses. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Speed Dating Data Set 18 “Speed Dating” in Appendix B includes “attractive” ratings of male dates made by the female dates. The summary statistics are n = 199, x = 6.19, s = 1.99. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the population mean of such ratings is less than 7.00.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Smoking Stopped In a program designed to help patients stop smoking, 198 patients were given sustained care, and 82.8% of them were no longer smoking after one month (based on data from “Sustained Care Intervention and Post discharge Smoking Cessation Among Hospitalized Adults,” by Rigotti et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 312, No. 7). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that 80% of patients stop smoking when given sustained care. Does sustained care appear to be effective?

Vitamin C and Aspirin A bottle contains a label stating that it contains Spring Valley pills with 500 mg of vitamin C, and another bottle contains a label stating that it contains Bayer pills with 325 mg of aspirin. When testing claims about the mean contents of the pills, which would have more serious implications: rejection of the Spring Valley vitamin C claim or rejection of the Bayer aspirin claim? Is it wise to use the same significance level for hypothesis tests about the mean amount of vitamin C and the mean amount of aspirin?

In Exercises 9–12, refer to the exercise identified. Make subjective estimates to decide whether results are significantly low or significantly high, then state a conclusion about the original claim. For example, if the claim is that a coin favours heads and sample results consist of 11 heads in 20 flips, conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the coin favours heads (because it is easy to get 11 heads in 20 flips by chance with a fair coin).

Exercise 5 “Online Data”

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free