Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Overtime Rule in Football Before the overtime rule in the National Football League was changed in 2011, among 460 overtime games, 252 were won by the team that won the coin toss at the beginning of overtime. Using a 0.05 significance level, test the claim that the coin toss is fair in the sense that neither team has an advantage by winning it. Does the coin toss appear to be fair?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Null hypothesis: The proportion of overtime wins that are won by the team that has won the coin toss is equal to 0.5.

Alternative hypothesis: The proportion of overtime wins that are won by the team that has won the coin toss is not equal to 0.5.

Test statistic: 2.05

Critical value: 1.96

P-value: 0.0404

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to reject the claim that the proportion of games that are won by the team that has won the coin toss is equal to 0.5.

The coin toss does not appear to be fair.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Out of 460 overtime games, 252 of them are won by the team that has won the coin toss. It is claimed that the coin toss is fair, and an equal number of teams who win/do not win the coin toss go on to win the game.

02

Hypotheses

The null hypothesis is written as follows.

The proportion of overtime wins that are won by the team that has won the coin toss is equal to 0.5.

H0:p=0.5

The alternative hypothesis is written as follows.

The proportion of overtime wins that are won by the team that has won the coin toss is not equal to 0.5.

H1:p0.5

The test is two-tailed.

03

Sample size, sample proportion, and population proportion

The sample size is equal to n=460.

The sample proportion of overtime wins that are won by the team that has won the coin toss is computed below.

p^=252460=0.548

The population proportion of games that are won by the team that has won the coin toss is equal to 0.5.

04

Test statistic

The value of the test statistic is computed below.

z=p^-ppqn=0.548-0.50.51-0.5460=2.05

Thus, z=2.05.

05

Critical value and p-value

Referring to the standard normal table, the critical value of z at for a two-tailed test is equal to 1.96.

Referring to the standard normal table, the p-value for the test statistic value of 2.05 is equal to 0.0404.

As the p-value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.

06

Conclusion of the test

There is enough evidence to reject the claim that the proportion of games that arewon by the team that has won the coin toss is equal to 0.5.

This concludes that the coin toss is not fair, and there is a greater chance of winning the game after winning the coin toss.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Identifying H0 and H1 . In Exercises 5–8, do the following:

a. Express the original claim in symbolic form.

b. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses.

Online Data Claim: Most adults would erase all of their personal information online if they could. A GFI Software survey of 565 randomly selected adults showed that 59% of them would erase all of their personal information online if they could.

Type I and Type II Errors. In Exercises 29–32, provide statements that identify the type I error and the type II error that correspond to the given claim. (Although conclusions are usually expressed in verbal form, the answers here can be expressed with statements that include symbolic expressions such as p = 0.1.).

The proportion of people with blue eyes is equal to 0.35.

In Exercises 1–4, use these results from a USA Today survey in which 510 people chose to respond to this question that was posted on the USA Today website: “Should Americans replace passwords with biometric security (fingerprints, etc)?” Among the respondents, 53% said “yes.” We want to test the claim that more than half of the population believes that passwords should be replaced with biometric security.

Requirements and Conclusions

a. Are any of the three requirements violated? Can the methods of this section be used to test the claim?

b. It was stated that we can easily remember how to interpret P-values with this: “If the P is low, the null must go.” What does this mean?

c. Another memory trick commonly used is this: “If the P is high, the null will fly.” Given that a hypothesis test never results in a conclusion of proving or supporting a null hypothesis, how is this memory trick misleading?

d. Common significance levels are 0.01 and 0.05. Why would it be unwise to use a significance level with a number like 0.0483?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Store Checkout-Scanner Accuracy In a study of store checkout-scanners, 1234 items were checked for pricing accuracy; 20 checked items were found to be overcharges, and 1214 checked items were not overcharges (based on data from “UPC Scanner Pricing Systems: Are They Accurate?” by Goodstein, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that with scanners, 1% of sales are overcharges. (Before scanners were used, the overcharge rate was estimated to be about 1%.) Based on these results, do scanners appear to help consumers avoid overcharges?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Cell Phones and Cancer In a study of 420,095 Danish cell phone users, 135 subjects developed cancer of the brain or nervous system (based on data from the Journal of the National Cancer Institute as reported in USA Today). Test the claim of a somewhat common belief that such cancers are affected by cell phone use. That is, test the claim that cell phone users develop cancer of the brain or nervous system at a rate that is different from the rate of 0.0340% for people who do not use cell phones. Because this issue has such great importance, use a 0.005 significance level. Based on these results, should cell phone users be concerned about cancer of the brain or nervous system?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free