Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Lead in Medicine Listed below are the lead concentrations (in \({\rm{\mu g > g}}\)) measured in different Ayurveda medicines. Ayurveda is a traditional medical system commonly used in India. The lead concentrations listed here are from medicines manufactured in the United States (based on data from “Lead, Mercury, and Arsenic in US and Indian Manufactured Ayurvedic Medicines Sold via the Internet,” by Saper et al., Journal of the American Medical Association,Vol. 300, No. 8). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the mean lead concentration for all such medicines is less than 14 \({\rm{\mu g/g}}\).

3.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 20.5 7.5 12.0 20.5 11.5 17.5

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the mean lead concentration for all such medicines is less than 14\(\mu g/g\).

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Sample of lead concentrations measured in different Ayurveda medicines is given (in \(\mu g/g\)); 3.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 20.5 7.5 12.0 20.5 11.5 17.5.

Level of significance is 0.05.

02

Check the requirements

Assume that the lead concentrations are normally distributed and the samples are randomly selected.

Thus, the sample size (n) of lead concentrations measured is 10.

03

Describe the hypothesis

Null hypothesis\(\left( {{H_0}} \right)\)is a statement of claim thatthe mean lead concentration is 14\({\rm{\mu g/g}}\).

Alternate hypothesis\(\left( {{H_1}} \right)\)is a statement of claim that the mean lead concentration is less than 14\({\rm{\mu g/g}}\).

Here,\(\mu \)is the true population mean lead concentration.

Mathematically, it can be expressed as

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:\mu = 14{\rm{ }}\\{H_1}:\mu < 14\end{array}\)

The hypothesis is left-tailed.

04

Calculate the test statistic

Formula for test statistics is given by,

\(t = \frac{{\bar x - \mu }}{{\frac{s}{{\sqrt n }}}}\)

Where ,\(\bar x\)is sample mean and s is standard deviation of sample.

The mean is computed as,

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar x = \frac{{\sum {{x_i}} }}{n}\\ = \frac{{3.0 + 6.5 + 6.0 + ... + 17.5}}{{10}}\\ = 11.05\end{array}\)

The standard deviation is computed as,

\(\begin{array}{c}s = \sqrt {\frac{{\sum {{{\left( {{x_i} - \bar x} \right)}^2}} }}{{n - 1}}} \\ = \sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( {3.0 - 11.05} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {6.5 - 11.05} \right)}^2} + ... + {{\left( {17.5 - 11.05} \right)}^2}}}{{10 - 1}}} \\ = 6.461\end{array}\)

By substituting the values, test statistics is given by,

\(\begin{array}{c}t = \frac{{\bar x - \mu }}{{\frac{s}{{\sqrt n }}}}\\ = \frac{{11.05 - 14}}{{\frac{{6.461}}{{\sqrt {10} }}}}\\ = - 1.444\end{array}\)

05

Calculate the critical value

For the significance level of 0.05,

The degree of freedom is,

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{Degree of freedom}} = n - 1\\ = 10 - 1\\{\rm{ }} = 9\end{array}\)

In the t-distribution table, find the value corresponding to the row value of degree of freedom 9 and column value of area in one tail 0.05 is 1.833 which is critical value\({{\rm{t}}_{{\rm{0}}{\rm{.05}}}}\)but the given test is left-tailed therefore use -1.833 as a critical value.

Thus, the critical value\({{\rm{t}}_{0.05}}\)is -1.833.

The critical region is\(\left( {t:t < - 1.833} \right)\).

06

Compare test statistics and critical value.

The test statistic is -1.444 and the critical value\({t_{0.05}}\) is -1.833.

According to this, we can conclude that the test statistics -1.444 will not fall in the critical region bounded by the critical value -1.833.

Therefore, we failed to reject the null hypothesis.

07

Conclusion

It is concluded that there is not enough evidence to support the claim thatmean lead concentrations measured in different Ayurveda medicines is less than 14\(\mu g/g\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Type I and Type II Errors. In Exercises 29–32, provide statements that identify the type I error and the type II error that correspond to the given claim. (Although conclusions are usually expressed in verbal form, the answers here can be expressed with statements that include symbolic expressions such as p = 0.1.).

The proportion of people who require no vision correction is less than 0.25.

In Exercises 9–12, refer to the exercise identified. Make subjective estimates to decide whether results are significantly low or significantly high, then state a conclusion about the original claim. For example, if the claim is that a coin favours heads and sample results consist of 11 heads in 20 flips, conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the coin favours heads (because it is easy to get 11 heads in 20 flips by chance with a fair coin).

Exercise 5 “Online Data”

Test Statistics. In Exercises 13–16, refer to the exercise identified and find the value of the test statistic. (Refer to Table 8-2 on page 362 to select the correct expression for evaluating the test statistic.)

Exercise 7 “Pulse Rates”

Identifying H0and H1. In Exercises 5–8, do the following:

a. Express the original claim in symbolic form.

b. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses.

Cell Phone Claim: Fewer than 95% of adults have a cell phone. In a Marist poll of 1128 adults, 87% said that they have a cell phone.

In Exercises 9–12, refer to the exercise identified. Make subjective estimates to decide whether results are significantly low or significantly high, then state a conclusion about the original claim. For example, if the claim is that a coin favours heads and sample results consist of 11 heads in 20 flips, conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the coin favours heads (because it is easy to get 11 heads in 20 flips by chance with a fair coin).

Exercise 8 “Pulse Rates”

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free