Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Testing Claims About Variation. In Exercises 5–16, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Assume that a simple random sample is selected from a normally distributed population.

Bank Lines The Jefferson Valley Bank once had a separate customer waiting line at each teller window, but it now has a single waiting line that feeds the teller windows as vacancies occur. The standard deviation of customer waiting times with the old multiple-line configuration was 1.8 min. Listed below is a simple random sample of waiting times (minutes) with the single waiting line. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that with a single waiting line, the waiting times have a standard deviation less than 1.8 min. What improvement occurred when banks changed from multiple waiting lines to a single waiting line?

6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 7.1 7.3 7.4 7.7 7.7 7.7

Short Answer

Expert verified

The hypotheses are as follows.

H0:σ=1.8H1:σ<1.8

The test statistic is 0.6312.

The critical value is 3.325.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to supportthe claim that with a single waiting line, the waiting times have a standard deviation of less than 1.8 min.

If the bank changed from multiple waiting lines to a single line, each customer waits almost for the same time in the line.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The standard deviation of waiting times with the old multiple-line configuration is 1.8 min.

The observations are recorded for the single-line waiting times.

The level of significance is 0.05.

The waiting time for a single line is less than 1.8 min.

02

Describe the hypothesis testing

For applying the hypothesis test, first set up a null and an alternative hypothesis.

The null hypothesis is the statement about the value of a population parameter, which is equal to the claimed value. It is denoted by H0.

The alternate hypothesis is a statement that the parameter has a value that is opposite to the null hypothesis. It is denoted by H1.

03

State the null and alternative hypotheses

Let σbe the standard deviation of waiting times for the single line.

As per the claim, the null and alternative hypotheses are as follows.

H0:σ=1.8H1:σ<1.8

The test is left-tailed.

04

Find the sample standard deviation

LetX be the simplerandom sample of waiting times (minutes) with the single waiting lineas follows.

6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 7.1 7.3 7.4 7.7 7.7 7.7

The samplemean is computed as follows.

x¯=i=1nxin=6.5+6.6+...+7.710=7.15

The sample standard deviation is calculated as follows.

s=i=1nxi-x¯2n-1=6.5-7.152+6.6-7.152+...+7.7-7.15210-1=0.4767

05

Find the test statistic

To conduct a hypothesis test of a claim about a population standard deviation σ or population varianceσ2,the test statistics is computed as follows.

.χ2=n-1×s2σ2=10-1×0.476721.82=0.6312

Thus, the value of the test statistic is 0.6312.

The degree of freedom is as follows.

df=n-1=10-1=9

06

Find the critical value 

The critical value χ0.052is obtained using the chi-square table as follows.

Pχ2<χα2=αPχ2>χα2=1-αPχ2>χ0.052=0.95

Referring to the chi-square table, the critical value, corresponding to the area of 0.05 and degree of freedom 9, is 3.325.

07

State the decision

The decision rule for the test is as follows.

If χ2<χ0.052, reject the null hypothesis at a given level of significance. Otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

As it is observed that χ2=0.6312<χ0.052=3.325, the null hypothesis is rejected.

08

Conclusion

Thus, there is enough evidence to support the claim that with a single waiting line, the waiting times have a standard deviation of less than 1.8 min.

The variation appears to be smaller in waiting times when a new single line is introduced than the old multiple-line configuration.It resulted in almost the same waiting time for each person.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Type I and Type II Errors. In Exercises 29–32, provide statements that identify the type I error and the type II error that correspond to the given claim. (Although conclusions are usually expressed in verbal form, the answers here can be expressed with statements that include symbolic expressions such as p = 0.1.).

The proportion of adults who use the internet is greater than 0.87.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Mickey D’s In a study of the accuracy of fast food drive-through orders, McDonald’s had 33 orders that were not accurate among 362 orders observed (based on data from QSR magazine). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the rate of inaccurate orders is equal to 10%. Does the accuracy rate appear to be acceptable?

In Exercises 1–4, use these results from a USA Today survey in which 510 people chose to respond to this question that was posted on the USA Today website: “Should Americans replace passwords with biometric security (fingerprints, etc)?” Among the respondents, 53% said “yes.” We want to test the claim that more than half of the population believes that passwords should be replaced with biometric security.

Requirements and Conclusions

a. Are any of the three requirements violated? Can the methods of this section be used to test the claim?

b. It was stated that we can easily remember how to interpret P-values with this: “If the P is low, the null must go.” What does this mean?

c. Another memory trick commonly used is this: “If the P is high, the null will fly.” Given that a hypothesis test never results in a conclusion of proving or supporting a null hypothesis, how is this memory trick misleading?

d. Common significance levels are 0.01 and 0.05. Why would it be unwise to use a significance level with a number like 0.0483?

P-Values. In Exercises 17–20, do the following:

a. Identify the hypothesis test as being two-tailed, left-tailed, or right-tailed.

b. Find the P-value. (See Figure 8-3 on page 364.)

c. Using a significance level of = 0.05, should we reject H0or should we fail to reject H0?

The test statistic of z = -1.94 is obtained when testing the claim that p=38 .

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Overtime Rule in Football Before the overtime rule in the National Football League was changed in 2011, among 460 overtime games, 252 were won by the team that won the coin toss at the beginning of overtime. Using a 0.05 significance level, test the claim that the coin toss is fair in the sense that neither team has an advantage by winning it. Does the coin toss appear to be fair?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free