Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Testing Claims About Variation. In Exercises 5–16, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Assume that a simple random sample is selected from a normally distributed population.

Aircraft Altimeters The Skytel Avionics company uses a new production method to manufacture aircraft altimeters. A simple random sample of new altimeters resulted in the errors listed below. Use a 0.05 level of significance to test the claim that the new production method has errors with a standard deviation greater than 32.2 ft, which was the standard deviation for the old production method. If it appears that the standard deviation is greater, does the new production method appear to be better or worse than the old method? Should the company take any action?

-42 78 -22 -72 -45 15 17 51 -5 -53 -9 -109

Short Answer

Expert verified

The hypotheses are as follows.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:\sigma = 32.2\,\,\\{H_1}:\sigma > 32.2\end{array}\)

The test statistic is 29.176, and the critical value is 19.675. The hypothesis is rejected to conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support the claim.

The company should take some action because the variation is to be greater than the old production method. So, the new method appears to be worse.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The new method of manufacturing altimeters results in the following errors:

-42 78 -22 -72 -45 15 17 51 -5 -53 -9 -109

The level of significance is 0.05.

The claim states that the standard deviation of errors from the new method is greater than 32.2 ft, which is the measure for the standard deviation from the old method.

02

Describe the hypothesis

For applying the hypothesis test, first set up a null and an alternative hypothesis.

The null hypothesis is the statement about the value of a population parameter, which is equal to the claimed value. It is denoted by\({H_0}\).

The alternate hypothesis is a statement that the parameter has a value that is opposite to the null hypothesis. It is denoted by\({H_1}\).

03

State the null and alternative hypotheses

Let\(\sigma \)be the actual standard deviation for the errors from the new method of manufacturing altimeters.

From the claim, the null and alternative hypotheses are as follows.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:\sigma = 32.2\,\,\\{H_1}:\sigma > 32.2\end{array}\)

04

Find the sample standard deviation

LetX be the simple random sample of errors. From the new method of manufacturing altimeters, it is calculated as follows.

-42 78 -22 -72 -45 15 17 51 -5 -53 -9 -109

The sample mean of X is computed as follows.

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar x = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{x_i}} }}{{\rm{n}}}\\ = \frac{{ - 42 + 78 + ... + \left( { - 109} \right)}}{{12}}\\ = - 16.3333\end{array}\)

The sample standard deviation is calculated as follows.

\(\begin{array}{c}s = \sqrt {\frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{{\left( {{x_i} - \bar x} \right)}^2}} }}{{n - 1}}} \\ = \sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( { - 42 - \left( { - 16.3333} \right)} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {78 - \left( { - 16.3333} \right)} \right)}^2} + ... + {{\left( { - 109 - \left( {16.3333} \right)} \right)}^2}}}{{12 - 1}}} \\ = 52.4410\end{array}\)

Thus, the sample standard deviation is 52.4410.

05

Compute the test statistic

To conduct a hypothesis test of a claim about a population standard deviation\(\sigma \) or population variance\({\sigma ^2}\),the test statistic is computed as follows.

\(\begin{array}{c}{\chi ^2} = \frac{{\left( {{\rm{n}} - 1} \right) \times {s^2}}}{{{\sigma ^2}}}\\ = \frac{{\left( {12 - 1} \right) \times {{52.4410}^2}}}{{{{32.2}^2}}}\\ = 29.176\end{array}\).

Thus, the value of the test statistic is 29.176.

The degree of freedom is as follows.

\(\begin{array}{c}df = n - 1\\ = 12 - 1\\ = 11\end{array}\)

06

Find the critical value

The critical value\(\chi _{0.05}^2\)is obtained using the chi-square table, as follows.

\(\begin{array}{c}P\left( {{\chi ^2} > \chi _\alpha ^2} \right) = \alpha \\P\left( {{\chi ^2} > \chi _{0.05}^2} \right) = 0.05\end{array}\)

Refer to the chi-square table for the critical value of 19.675, corresponding to the area of 0.05 and the degree of freedom 11.

07

 Step 7: State the decision

The decision rule for the test is as follows.

If\({\chi ^2} > \chi _{0.05}^2\),reject the null hypothesis at a given level of significance. Otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

As it is observed that \({\chi ^2} = 29.176\, > \,\chi _{0.05}^2 = 19.675\), the null hypothesis is rejected.

08

Conclusion

Thus, there is enough evidence to supportthe claim that the new production method has errors with a standard deviation greater than 32.2 ft, which was the standard deviation for the old production method.

The variation appears to be greater than that in the old production method. So, the new method appears to be worse.

The company should take immediate action to reduce the variation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Stem Cell Survey Adults were randomly selected for a Newsweek poll. They were asked if they “favor or oppose using federal tax dollars to fund medical research using stem cells obtained from human embryos.” Of those polled, 481 were in favor, 401 were opposed, and 120 were unsure. A politician claims that people don’t really understand the stem cell issue and their responses to such questions are random responses equivalent to a coin toss. Exclude the 120 subjects who said that they were unsure, and use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the proportion of subjects who respond in favor is equal to 0.5. What does the result suggest about the politician’s claim?

Type I and Type II Errors. In Exercises 29–32, provide statements that identify the type I error and the type II error that correspond to the given claim. (Although conclusions are usually expressed in verbal form, the answers here can be expressed with statements that include symbolic expressions such as p = 0.1.).

The proportion of adults who use the internet is greater than 0.87.

In Exercises 1–4, use these results from a USA Today survey in which 510 people chose to respond to this question that was posted on the USA Today website: “Should Americans replace passwords with biometric security (fingerprints, etc)?” Among the respondents, 53% said “yes.” We want to test the claim that more than half of the population believes that passwords should be replaced with biometric security.

Requirements and Conclusions

a. Are any of the three requirements violated? Can the methods of this section be used to test the claim?

b. It was stated that we can easily remember how to interpret P-values with this: “If the P is low, the null must go.” What does this mean?

c. Another memory trick commonly used is this: “If the P is high, the null will fly.” Given that a hypothesis test never results in a conclusion of proving or supporting a null hypothesis, how is this memory trick misleading?

d. Common significance levels are 0.01 and 0.05. Why would it be unwise to use a significance level with a number like 0.0483?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Mendelian Genetics When Mendel conducted his famous genetics experiments with peas, one sample of offspring consisted of 428 green peas and 152 yellow peas. Use a 0.01 significance level to test Mendel’s claim that under the same circumstances, 25% of offspring peas will be yellow. What can we conclude about Mendel’s claim?

Testing Hypotheses. In Exercises 13–24, assume that a simple random sample has been selected and test the given claim. Unless specified by your instructor, use either the P-value method or the critical value method for testing hypotheses. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Earthquake Depths Data Set 21 “Earthquakes” in Appendix B lists earthquake depths, and the summary statistics are n = 600, x = 5.82 km, s = 4.93 km. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim of a seismologist that these earthquakes are from a population with a mean equal to 5.00 km.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free