Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Mendelian Genetics Experiments are conducted with hybrids of two types of peas. If the offspring follow Mendel’s theory of inheritance, the seeds that are produced are yellow smooth, green smooth, yellow wrinkled, and green wrinkled, and they should occur in the ratio of 9:3:3:1, respectively. An experiment is designed to test Mendel’s theory, with the result that the offspring seeds consist of 307 that are yellow smooth, 77 that are green smooth, 98 that are yellow wrinkled, and 18 that are green wrinkled. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the results contradict Mendel’s theory.

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is enough evidence to conclude that theobserved frequencies of the 4 types of seeds do not occur in the expected ratio as proposed by Mendel.

Thus, results contradict Mendel’s theory.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The frequency of 4 different kinds of seeds are recorded. The expected frequencies should occur in the ratio 9:3:3:1.

02

Check the requirements

Assume that each experimental unit is selected randomly.

The test meets the requirements if the expected values are larger than 5.

Let O denote the observed frequencies of people of different races.

The following values are obtained:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{O_1} = 307\\{O_2} = 77\\{O_3} = 98\\{O_4} = 18\end{aligned}\)

The sum of all observed frequencies is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}n = 307 + 77 + .... + 18\\ = 500\end{aligned}\)

Let E denote the expected frequencies.

Let the yellow smooth seed type be denoted by 1, green smooth seed type be denoted by 2, yellow wrinkled seed type be denoted by 3 and green wrinkled seed type be denoted by 4.

The expected frequencies will occur in the given ratio of 9:3:3:1.

Therefore, the expected frequencies are computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_1} = \frac{9}{{9 + 3 + 3 + 1}}\left( {500} \right)\\ = \frac{9}{{16}}\left( {500} \right)\\ = 281.25\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_2} = \frac{3}{{9 + 3 + 3 + 1}}\left( {500} \right)\\ = \frac{3}{{16}}\left( {500} \right)\\ = 93.75\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{E_3} = \frac{3}{{9 + 3 + 3 + 1}}\left( {500} \right)\\ = \frac{3}{{16}}\left( {500} \right)\\ = 93.75\end{aligned}\)

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{E_4} = \frac{1}{{9 + 3 + 3 + 1}}\left( {500} \right)\\ = \frac{1}{{16}}\left( {500} \right)\\ = 31.25\end{aligned}\]

Thus, the requirements are satisfied.

03

State the hypotheses

The hypotheses are,

\({H_0}:\)The observed frequencies of the 4 types of seeds are in the expected ratio as proposed by Mendel.

\({H_a}:\)The observed frequencies of the 4 types of seeds do not occur in the expected ratio as proposed by Mendel.

04

Compute the test statistic

The table below shows the necessary calculations:

Outcome

O

E

\(\left( {O - E} \right)\)

\({\left( {O - E} \right)^2}\)

\(\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}\)

Yellow Smooth

307

281.25

25.75

663.0625

2.357556

Green Smooth

77

93.75

-16.75

280.5625

2.992667

Yellow Wrinkled

98

93.75

4.25

18.0625

0.192667

Green Wrinkled

18

31.25

-13.25

175.5625

5.618

The value of the test statistic is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{\chi ^2} = \sum {\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}} \\ = 2.357556 + 2.992667 + ...... + 5.618\\ = 11.161\end{aligned}\)

Thus,\({\chi ^2} = 11.161\).

Let k be the number of seed types, which is 4.

The degrees of freedom for\({\chi ^2}\)is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df = k - 1\\ = 4 - 1\\ = 3\end{aligned}\)

The critical value of\({\chi ^2}\)at

\(\alpha = 0.05\)with 3 degrees of freedom is equal to 7.815.

The p-value is equal to 0.011.

Since the test statistic value is greater than the critical value and the p-value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.

05

State the conclusion

There is enough evidence to conclude that theobserved frequencies of the 4 types of seeds do not occur in the expected ratio as proposed by Mendel.

Thus, results contradict Mendel’s theory at 0.05 level of significance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Weather-Related Deaths For a recent year, the numbers of weather-related U.S. deaths for each month were 28, 17, 12, 24, 88, 61, 104, 32, 20, 13, 26, 25 (listed in order beginning with January). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that weather-related deaths occur in the different months with the same frequency. Provide an explanation for the result.

Cybersecurity When using the data from Exercise 1 to test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford’s law, identify the null and alternative hypotheses.

Car Repair Costs Listed below are repair costs (in dollars) for cars crashed at 6 mi/h in full-front crash tests and the same cars crashed at 6 mi/h in full-rear crash tests (based on data from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety). The cars are the Toyota Camry, Mazda 6, Volvo S40, Saturn Aura, Subaru Legacy, Hyundai Sonata, and Honda Accord. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between the repair costs from full-front crashes and full-rear crashes?

Front

936

978

2252

1032

3911

4312

3469

Rear

1480

1202

802

3191

1122

739

2767

The table below shows results since 2006 of challenged referee calls in the U.S. Open. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the gender of the tennis player is independent of whether the call is overturned. Do players of either gender appear to be better at challenging calls?

Was the Challenge to the Call Successful?


Yes

No

Men

161

376

Women

68

152

Exercises 1–5 refer to the sample data in the following table, which summarizes the last digits of the heights (cm) of 300 randomly selected subjects (from Data Set 1 “Body Data” in Appendix B). Assume that we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the data are from a population having the property that the last digits are all equally likely.

Last Digit

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Frequency

30

35

24

25

35

36

37

27

27

24

What are the null and alternative hypotheses corresponding to the stated claim?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free