Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Forward Grip Reach and Ergonomics When designing cars and aircraft, we must consider the forward grip reach of women. Women have normally distributed forward grip reaches with a mean of 686 mm and a standard deviation of 34 mm (based on anthropometric survey data from Gordon, Churchill, et al.).

a. If a car dashboard is positioned so that it can be reached by 95% of women, what is the shortest forward grip reach that can access the dashboard?

b. If a car dashboard is positioned so that it can be reached by women with a grip reach greater than 650 mm, what percentage of women cannot reach the dashboard? Is that percentage too high?

c. Find the probability that 16 randomly selected women have forward grip reaches with a mean greater than 680 mm. Does this result have any effect on the design?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. If 95% of women can reach the car dashboard, the value of the shortest forward grip reach is equal to 630mm.

b. The percentage of women who cannot reach the dashboard is equal to 14.46%.The percentage is too high indicating that a significant portion of women will be left out.

c. The probability of selecting 16 women with a mean forward grip reach value greater than 680 mm is equal to 0.7611.

Only individual women occupy the driver's seat and not a group of 16 women hence this conclusion has no effect on the design.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Forward grip reaches of women are distributed normally with a mean equal to 686 mm and standard deviation equal to 34 mm.

02

Converting area to a value

a.

It is given that 95% can reach the dashboard.

Let\({z_p}\)denote the z-score of the minimum value of the forward grip reach.

This implies the following expression:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}P\left( {z \ge {z_p}} \right) = 0.95\\1 - P\left( {z < {z_p}} \right) = 0.95\\P\left( {z < {z_p}} \right) = 0.05\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the value of the z-score for an area under the curve equal to 0.05 is equal to -1.645.

It is known that:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\mu = 686\;mm\\\sigma = 34\;mm\end{aligned}\)

Let X denote the shortest forward grip reach.

To compute the value of the shortest forward grip reach, the following calculations are done:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}z = \frac{{x - \mu }}{\sigma }\\ - 1.645 = \frac{{x - 686}}{{34}}\\x = \left( { - 1.645} \right)34 + 686\\ = 630.07\\ \approx 630\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, if 95% of women can reach the car dashboard, the value of the shortest forward grip reach is equal to 630mm.

03

Probability

b.

Let X denote the forward grip reach value.

The car dashboard can be reached by women with a grip reach greater than 650 mm.

Therefore, women with forward grip reach less than 650 mm cannot reach the dashboard.

The proportion of women who cannot reach the dashboard is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}P\left( {X < 650} \right) = P\left( {\frac{{X - \mu }}{\sigma } < \frac{{650 - \mu }}{\sigma }} \right)\\ = P\left( {Z < \frac{{650 - 686}}{{34}}} \right)\\ = P\left( {Z < - 1.06} \right)\\ = 1 - P\left( {Z < 1.06} \right)\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c} = 1 - 0.8554\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\left( {\therefore {\rm{From}}\;{\rm{Standard}}\;{\rm{normal}}\;{\rm{table}}} \right)\\ = 0.1446\\ = 14.46\% \end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the percentage of women who cannot reach the dashboard is equal to 14.46%.

The percentage is too high, indicating that a significant portion of women will be left out.

04

Sampling distribution of sample mean

c.

If the forward grip reach value denoted by X follows normal distribution with mean\(\left( \mu \right)\)and standard deviation\(\left( \sigma \right)\), then the mean forward grip reach value follows normal distribution with mean\(\left( \mu \right)\)and standard deviation\(\left( {\frac{\sigma }{{\sqrt n }}} \right)\).

Here, n is given to be equal to 16.

The probability of selecting 16 women with a mean forward grip reach value greater than 680 mm is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}P\left( {\bar X > 680} \right) = P\left( {\frac{{\bar X > \mu }}{{\frac{\sigma }{{\sqrt n }}}} > \frac{{680 - \mu }}{{\frac{\sigma }{{\sqrt n }}}}} \right)\\ = P\left( {Z > \frac{{680 - 686}}{{\frac{{34}}{{\sqrt {16} }}}}} \right)\\ = P\left( {Z > - 0.71} \right)\end{aligned}\)

Simplifying this further, the following value is obtained using the standard normal table:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}P\left( {Z > - 0.71} \right) = P\left( {Z < 0.71} \right)\\ = 0.7611\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the probability of selecting 16 women with a mean forward grip reach value greater than 680 mm is equal to 0.7611.

Only individual women occupy the driver's seat and not a group of 16 women; hence this conclusion has no effect on the design.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Questions 6โ€“10 refer to the sample data in the following table, which describes the fate of the passengers and crew aboard the Titanic when it sank on April 15, 1912. Assume that the data are a sample from a large population and we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that surviving is independent of whether the person is a man, woman, boy, or girl.


Men

Women

Boys

Girls

Survived

332

318

29

27

Died

1360

104

35

18

Is the hypothesis test left-tailed, right-tailed, or two-tailed?

In Exercises 5โ€“20, conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and, or critical value, and state the conclusion.

Kentucky Derby The table below lists the frequency of wins for different post positions through the 141st running of the Kentucky Derby horse race. A post position of 1 is closest to the inside rail, so the horse in that position has the shortest distance to run. (Because the number of horses varies from year to year, only the first 10 post positions are included.) Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions. Based on the result, should bettors consider the post position of a horse racing in the Kentucky Derby?

Post Position

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Wins

19

14

11

15

15

7

8

12

5

11

Critical Thinking: Was Allstate wrong? The Allstate insurance company once issued a press release listing zodiac signs along with the corresponding numbers of automobile crashes, as shown in the first and last columns in the table below. In the original press release, Allstate included comments such as one stating that Virgos are worried and shy, and they were involved in 211,650 accidents, making them the worst offenders. Allstate quickly issued an apology and retraction. In a press release, Allstate included this: โ€œAstrological signs have absolutely no role in how we base coverage and set rates. Rating by astrology would not be actuarially sound.โ€

Analyzing the Results The original Allstate press release did not include the lengths (days) of the different zodiac signs. The preceding table lists those lengths in the third column. A reasonable explanation for the different numbers of crashes is that they should be proportional to the lengths of the zodiac signs. For example, people are born under the Capricorn sign on 29 days out of the 365 days in the year, so they are expected to have 29/365 of the total number of crashes. Use the methods of this chapter to determine whether this appears to explain the results in the table. Write a brief report of your findings.

Zodiac sign

Dates

Length(days)

Crashes

Capricorn

Jan.18-Feb. 15

29

128,005

Aquarius

Feb.16-March 11

24

106,878

Pisces

March 12-April 16

36

172,030

Aries

April 17-May 13

27

112,402

Taurus

May 14-June 19

37

177,503

Gemini

June 20-July 20

31

136,904

Cancer

July21-Aug.9

20

101,539

Leo

Aug.10-Sep.15

37

179,657

Virgo

Sep.16-Oct.30

45

211,650

Libra

Oct.31-Nov 22

23

110,592

Scorpio

Nov. 23-Nov. 28

6

26,833

Ophiuchus

Nov.29-Dec.17

19

83,234

Sagittarius

Dec.18-Jan.17

31

154,477

In his book Outliers,author Malcolm Gladwell argues that more

American-born baseball players have birth dates in the months immediately following July 31 because that was the age cutoff date for nonschool baseball leagues. The table below lists months of births for a sample of American-born baseball players and foreign-born baseball players. Using a 0.05 significance level, is there sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that months of births of baseball players are independent of whether they are born in America? Do the data appear to support Gladwellโ€™s claim?


Born in America

Foreign Born

Jan.

387

101

Feb.

329

82

March

366

85

April

344

82

May

336

94

June

313

83

July

313

59

Aug.

503

91

Sept.

421

70

Oct.

434

100

Nov.

398

103

Dec.

371

82

Benfordโ€™s Law. According to Benfordโ€™s law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below. In Exercises 21โ€“24, test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benfordโ€™s law.

Leading Digits

Benford's Law: Distributuon of leading digits

1

30.10%

2

17.60%

3

12.50%

4

9.70%

5

7.90%

6

6.70%

7

5.80%

8

5.10%

9

4.60%

Authorโ€™s Check Amounts Exercise 21 lists the observed frequencies of leading digits from amounts on checks from seven suspect companies. Here are the observed frequencies of the leading digits from the amounts on the most recent checks written by the author at the time this exercise was created: 83, 58, 27, 21, 21, 21, 6, 4, 9. (Those observed frequencies correspond to the leading digits of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively.) Using a 0.01 significance level, test the claim that these leading digits are from a population of leading digits that conform to Benfordโ€™s law. Does the conclusion change if the significance level is 0.05?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free